Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
三位一体揭露
@trinity_sponge_DJM_m16
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002099981181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trinity_sponge_DJM_m16 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trinity_sponge_DJM_m16 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 3 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 14 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
E大妈全家福 Konsequenzen 嫁祸出卖低级黑小明和廖梦婷Molly的犹大 🔙E大妈 🔙menu
傻逼大师最终指控出卖自己同伙! 根据傻逼大师,The Wellness Company affiliated= phony dissidents https://rumble.com/v4hhuou-twc-red-flags-the-expanding-narrative-network.html?e9s=src_v1_upp 他特别指名了Alex Jones 图 2-3 然而,理哥很爱看Alex Jones的info War! 甚至在配婆访台期间用了AJ的照片当头像。 已经被证实是理哥群管+Konsequenzen的Roger Cheng的ID居然同可防可控的反对派福林将军阵营内的Roger Stone?! 这是个巧合? ! 还是一个网军的代号? ! 这么说,当年理哥假扮Q的代理人,除了George Soros,另一个线则是TWC! 傻逼大师更指控挺伊维菌素的就是台美军工复合体,那么不正是指控当时在推伊维的m…
https://t.me/MI6CATW/235
https://t.me/MI6CATW/224
https://t.me/MI6CATW/224
https://t.me/djhxiaomingbroadcast/877 Line被台湾政府监控 然而m16创CDS MMS台湾群,因为通民进党DS,DS允许他创群割韭菜消灭人口。 ⬅️trinity
钢铁明粉+加州鲁蛇的罪刑 明粉被MMS消灭刚好 First of all, M16小明尊重其他人不同意见不是一个正当的借口与王大师合作。 王大师并没有在传递真相,甚至没在反疫苗That is to say, 王在帮深层政府为稳叫人躺平。然而王大师没有任何生产力没办法扩张,唯一他能生存的方式就是利用原川粉。靠川普Q的骗子带了流量后,他们endorse/tolerate 反川的王帮他带来观众。相当于前理哥+小明m16+地球谷VS王。王大师表面上这么黑川,但是implicitely其实他依靠川普维生。 所以m16小明接纳王大师唯一的理由是-他们在养他,其实他们反川pro Deep state, quite simply。 更别说王大师已被证实涉入王医生谋杀及通福恶魔撒共生团,他们是要证明他们也涉入这些犯罪? 我们知道m16监控威胁在美国的华人、骗韭菜抖内. . . and so on, 我们知道但不代表我们恨他们。 …
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @trinity_sponge_DJM_m16. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 814,846 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“三位一体揭露” (@trinity_sponge_DJM_m16), 3 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trinity_sponge_DJM_m16.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.