Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Impostor Wang

Channel

Impostor Wang

@charlatanWang

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002119586472
TypeChannel
Username@charlatanWang
Description王醫生謀殺案共犯 https://t.me/Edama198964444/111 E大媽SEO-共生團文婕爛泥-福惡魔撒-李中安炸群-Roger Cheng 言論審查-王大師智障陰謀論-Google 最強網軍複合體
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/charlatanWang

Growth

114 Aug 2026, 15:33 — 1 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 11:33 — 1 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 15:3315 Aug 2026, 11:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 11:331no change
14 Aug 2026, 15:331first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 26 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
89
Videos
5
Links
59

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2024, 05:45 UTC61 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @mmtktoc

✨亨利哥 音频✨ 💫《亨利哥乱聊》音频合集 💫亨利哥乱聊——道西戰爭VrilSociety 💫亨利哥亂聊——光某会家族内部头脑编程 👍 光明会血系家族成员JAY PARKER揭露光某会的起源,仪式,灵魂,意识。 - 光明会13家族其实是12家族+撒旦 - 全球有2万多个光明会家族,都和蜥蜴族群(天龙人)有联系 - 光明会从胎儿就开始的创伤编程和天赋培养 - 光明会最看重的是可以影响集体意识的能力和职业 - 很多人在能量层就被设置了封印阻止他们和自己的高维意识连接 - 为什么说链接高我是脱离矩阵的关键 - 目前版本的圣经经历了几万次的修改 - 利他倾向对于个体灵魂发展的作用 - 川普去拜见圣保罗教堂的原因 - 美国有1/10的人被邪教脑控 - 不是所有的光明会成员都可以变身,达到一定的蜥蜴DNA比例的人才可以 - Q提到的P,疑似帕索尔家族到底是什么 ㊙️密太空群 🪐🛸 👽 总目录 | Q太空群 | FAQ | Q时事群

15 Aug 2024, 05:45 UTC62 viewsread 15 August 2026

咱们的管理啊,亨利哥。录亨利哥乱聊的那个。他主要管理微信和土豆的Q群

15 Aug 2024, 05:45 UTC45 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @mmtktoc

✨总目录✨ 有关 Q - Q图 - 文章 冥想 - 脉轮 - 冥想詞♨️ 揭露视频 - 《阴谋的败落》系列 - 《揭露宇宙》系列 - 访谈|演讲 - 更多 书籍推荐 名人基因家族 FAQ1 FAQ2 亨利哥音频 推薦頻道 - 晨牧人靈性覺醒頻道 ♨️ - 亨利哥頻道♨️ - 神仙講故事頻道 ♨️ ㊙️密太空群🛸🪐 总目录 | 晨牧人頻道 |FAQ |Q太空群 | Q时事群i

18 Jul 2024, 18:25 UTC331 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

其实笔者也不想审查黑川的人,我真的很想知道我们该怎样生存在川普是DS演员的世界内。反正之后几个月就会知道川普是否是DS演戏,实在不需要每次事件在关键时刻公布事先存好的证据,反正怀疑川普的人几乎已经决定了。 那么,很多人挺川只是希望世界和平,这些人黑川,做这些事情也是为了公益?他们只是想证明自己躲了毒针又比别人更聪明。但是,真的只是为了这个目的?为了这个简单的目的,他们需要一天内长时间监控自己持有的群组留言,甚至其他群组的?是不用工作吗?笔者除了打广告,可不会一直24h监控很多频道的发文 说白了,他们黑川是因为有薪水。 何况,川普只允许加速生产疫苗,那些big pharma 又不是他的,你家人打疫苗怪川普?川普怎样得罪你了?你家人打疫苗是因为川普endorsed vaccine?天大笑话! 当时反疫苗的先驱Lin Wood, Powell 虽然不知道他们是黑是白,才是真正的从毒针救了世界上许多人。反而中文圈那群人只是因为选

18 Jul 2024, 11:29 UTC233 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

其中最后的暗示 中文圈内最后的几个深层政府大外宣 来源是郭文贵+2021~2022or 到现在的福林将军间谍系统及猪妹导师晨牧人系统分出来的川黑系统 完全同离谱太太一派的贱谍渗透挺川与反川的伎俩 最主要的征兆就是当时MAGA内因位C19被医死的Veronica Wolski https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/covid-patient-at-center-of-ivermectin-debate-dies-at-chicago-area-hospital/2611024/ 如果她被白帽子保护, 不可能用这么反反疫苗的方式假死被保护还挫败当时反疫苗毒针的社群,只可能是因为她被福林的间谍系统渗透后谋杀 那几个大外宣无论挺川黑川都刻意忽略了attempt of attentat 川普谋杀内有多个枪+Vance最终连结的是Qanons阴谋论内最核心的议题, 还有川普选Vance最主

16 Jul 2024, 15:47 UTC166 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

一个急件+忘记说的 很快解释 其实大马离谱太太的势力从没离开,他们还共用George Soros下的反送中~民进党蒋家 离谱太太的转变: 挺川+反疫苗>挺川+挺民进党+挺疫苗?! 为何他们旗下的人物又转变成反川了?还涉入了反民进党的王大师? 其实离谱太太或她同势力的人一直在TG上。在TG上中文圈的渗透势力几乎是George Soros 离谱太太反送中~民进党蒋家 不然怎么会有香港人用台湾的部落格在写文?这些不合理的现象。那么恨西方却比较美国与欧洲国家的瑞士,这些笑话。如果东方这么好棒棒那么想要东升西落,为何不举例一个东方国家啊? 我不知道John Wick是否真的是Godof 李中安,但是如果这些势力通王大师,也一定涉入王医生谋杀。 他的群内有666+入群刚好"36"=666,摆明就是深层政府的人 完全是王大师的假唐纳德川普666 还有一个很明显的记号 以Q理论俄罗斯被控制是因为普京被控制,完全不是因为俄罗斯是白

8 Jul 2024, 09:07 UTC37 viewsread 15 August 2026

續上篇,elain曾多次指控多人是中共臥底,即使有這個可能,相比在共生團抓共諜,非常少提到綠共相關的事情,與她親近的roger cheng(近期改名為豐鑫),好幾次與理哥親信FNSTY做出相同的論述:「政府不可能投入資源在這個小社群」,其實這就是替綠共政府在打掩護了,綜合全局來看,我認為ERJ這三人或是其中的人有幫助綠共的嫌疑, 還續上篇的915事件,王醫師意外離世的事情若與深層政府或旗下執行者綠共相關,那麼這3人會如何做? 是否就是與深藍背景相關的王大師一搭一唱, 將謀殺的帽子甩在有親綠背景的呂丹宜博士身上? 因為在此事件若不是「純意外」,呂丹宜博士正是對於深層政府來說最佳的「甩鍋對象」。 至於怎麼想就由各位朋友自己琢磨了

8 Jul 2024, 09:07 UTC29 viewsread 15 August 2026

直接進入重點分析: 915事件最大的受害者是王群光醫師與其家屬,其次便是呂丹宜博士。 〈斷句〉 其實elain .roger cheng .jia嘉 這三人為首,並沒有在915事件當中受害,而他們所做的爭吵、爭論,其實正好才是加害呂丹宜博士的「加速師」行為,他們私底下還做論述表示:王大師群裡面的群友,很多是中共派來害呂丹宜博士的,只因呂丹宜博士有親綠背景 這理由並無法說服人,低級黑小明群與王大師群當中的粉絲,原本並沒有對呂丹宜博士有惡意,反而是共生團相關的幾人的行為像是搞分裂,而後來elain也接手了中道自然醫學群組,事後回顧相當可疑, 這個手法就像筆者之後會提到的炸群事件,炸群者與反炸群的人是同一批人, 先是摧毀大眾的信任,再接近被害者提供幫助。 而之後的王大師就找到題材一般,時不時就提到「大象醫師」作為節目談資,而elain相關這些人就像與王大師打乒乓球一樣,王大師喊大象;共生團就蓋大樓,似乎雙方的有合作關係一般,筆

8 Jul 2024, 09:07 UTC27 viewsread 15 August 2026

而王大師群大約是2022年7月初開群,那時問題還沒顯現出來, 直到9月份王群光醫師意外離世事件,就開始越發詭異, 王大師群不用加入也能看內容,各位可以去回顧2022年9月15日前後,當時現任共生團群主elain就與王大師群的群友做出爭執,其實王大師群當中的群友一開始並非對呂丹宜博士有懷疑與惡意,實際上是elain 與roger cheng .jia嘉還有一些不知名的人經過大量爭執過後,整個風向才開始質變,詭異的是事後roger cheng jia嘉都聲稱他們被王大師踢出+刪文,一向不刪文的王大師怎麼會刪除文章呢? 而且好一段時間elain都還在王大師群,王大師若是覺得elain在監控他,那為何不踢出elain呢? #王大師 #elain #915事件

3 Jul 2024, 11:10 UTC43 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

王大師群組也在差不多時間變成無法搜尋成員以及過去對話,筆者認為erj其中或全部有串通王大師的嫌疑,以及上面所說過的理論,不然無法解釋為何會如此巧合。 #串通嫌疑

26 Jun 2024, 10:47 UTC28 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @Edama198964444Photo

王群光医生之死Roger Cheng的魔术 『交通』一词背后的阴影? 垃圾频道的揭露内的行车纪录, 证明强调行车机车的骑士,反而不是王医生! 在录影内王医生完全神隐了,能看到的只有是他所谓倒地的骑士 看看他揭露内的indices 因为骑士身穿黑色,天色昏暗影像辨识困难 不正是骑士为了不在纪录片内被注意到,的预谋? 其实他提供的YT证据,只可以证明这个第三方因为这个车祸停下来,『刚好是绿灯时』,没办法证明王医生当时闯红灯 这,不就是Roger Cheng的把戏吗?为了和媒体说服读者,王医生闯了红灯死了活该 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgPyPrkhwrI 最重要的,为何王医生是因为『交通』死亡? 而到底是谁,最爱说『交通』? 不就是那个装作Q渗透到TG各群、揭露民进党交通弊案却是100%民进党可防可控的反对派的理哥吗? 事后,那些政府的媒体以及看似政府交通弊案吹哨人实际可

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @charlatanWang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Impostor Wang” (@charlatanWang), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/charlatanWang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.