Channel
@trigger_schastya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
432subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001896659364 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trigger_schastya |
| Description | Отношения могут быть в кайф, а люди - счастливыми. Как быть собой в семье, не жертвовать и не спасать? Техники. Примеры Коуч и психолог по отношениям Натали Миронова. Фотограф. Журналист и катализатор вашей любви к себе Консультация @Natalyfree |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 July 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trigger_schastya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 10:22 | 432 | no change |
| 3 Oct 2026, 09:47 | 432 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 22 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (22 September 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 174 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 83.3% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как полюбить себя? Была на психологической выставке Про любовь. Ключевой вопрос выставки: как создать счастливые отношения? В интервью, все участники говорили одно и то же: Сначала полюби себя. А я все задавала себе один и тот же вопрос: - Как понять, что ты себя не любишь? И с какого момента можно считать, что это любовь? Потому что я, например, не смогу сказать, что люблю себя. И мне очень знакомы сомнения в сво…
Signed ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕪𝕒 𝕄𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕧𝕒
Ты живёшь свою жизнь или топчешь колею?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕪𝕒 𝕄𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕧𝕒
Растрогало до слёз. Вот это стремление к стабильности (вполне нормальное, кстати), может ли оно быть причиной твоего несчастья? А как без стабильности? Если нужно и ребёнка в школу собрать, и коммуналку оплатить, я уж про свои девочковые желания молчу! К сожалению, когда в приоритете стабильность, ты просыпаешься однажды и понимаешь, что живёшь вообще не свою жизнь. Но выйти из колеи страшно. Видео напомнило мне, …
Signed ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕪𝕒 𝕄𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕧𝕒
Если бы кто-то мне сказал об этом раньше... #Просто_диалог - Знаешь, я столько времени подстраивалась под ненормальность. Выбрала себе мега сложного человека, который обижался на каждое моё действие, реагировал криком на мою отличающуюся позицию. И потом я уже научилась ловко обходить все острые темы, научилась заранее предугадывать его реакции. Я даже гордилась собой. Всерьёз верила, что "просто для мужчины норм…
❤3
Signed ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕪𝕒 𝕄𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕧𝕒
Как проверить, подходите ли вы друг другу? Про любовь и несвободу. Тема страшная, поэтому нормально, если ты мне не поверишь. Я проверила способ на себе и видела, что им пользуются те, кто создал счастливые отношения. Совместимость для меня - это как раз совпадение людей по КЛЮЧЕВЫМ ЦЕННОСТЯМ, а не по привычкам. Мужчина может восхищать своей жизненной позицией и стойкостью, но разбрасывать носки по дому и курить. …
Signed ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕪𝕒 𝕄𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕧𝕒
Люблю, но есть НО. Все меня в нём устраивает, но есть одно но. И дальше разговор идёт уже о том, в чем люди абсолютно не совпадают. В моём случае это было молчание бывшего мужа (и не только молчание). И с этим молчанием я так и не смогла смириться. Сразу скажу, что иногда пара просто не умеет слышать друг друга. И с этим можно работать, например, в групповой терапии. Тогда отношения налаживаются. А я хочу рассказат…
❤4
Signed ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕪𝕒 𝕄𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕧𝕒
Андрей написал из школы: "Прости" Вот сердце разрывается, хочется кинуться к нему, сказать, что не обижаюсь😢💟 Так обычно и случалось, потому что я не могла вынести его страданий из-за чувства вины К сожалению, теперь ему придётся пройти через боль вины. Спасая его от чувства вины, я создала ему иллюзию, что можно прожить жизнь и не причинить боли. Жизнь в стерильном мире
❤2
Signed ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕪𝕒 𝕄𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕧𝕒
Уйти и не помогать. Иногда это единственный способ наладить отношения. Ты знаешь, что иногда, помощь может вредить отношениям? Собираемся с сыном в школу. Он психует, ему постоянно что-то не нравится. Это уже его привычное поведение. Проблема в том, что я привыкла видеть его глубже. Понимать, что он не хочет идти в школу, что ему плохо, что папы нет рядом. И вот это вот всё я ПОНИМАЮ! Я вообще такая понимающая и н…
🙏2❤1
Signed ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕪𝕒 𝕄𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕧𝕒
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @trigger_schastya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ты живёшь свою жизнь или топчешь колею?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПСИХОЛОГ ДЛЯ СЛОЖНЫХ” (@trigger_schastya), 432 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trigger_schastya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.