Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

кул стори от тори🖤

@torrikm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001702580798
TypeChannel
Username@torrikm
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/torrikm

Growth

1211231226 August 2026 — 121 subscribers9 August 2026 — 121 subscribers14 August 2026 — 123 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:17123+2
9 Aug 2026, 03:47121no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:51121first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 18 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 123 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
50.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (18 August 20257 August 2026)
Views total24
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 18s
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10360.9%
🔥2917.2%
❤‍🔥1911.2%
🥰116.51%
💘31.78%
🏆21.18%
👍10.592%
👏10.592%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC24 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥5🔥3🥰21👏1

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

20 Mar 2026, 15:25 UTC238 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

слитый персонаж тс2🙈

8🔥3

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

16 Mar 2026, 12:31 UTC252 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Спустя полгода у меня снова появилось желание что-то снимать🥹 Вот так, ТС2 еще не вышли, а я уже в голове у себя все придумала 😂

10👍1

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

14 Mar 2026, 19:33 UTC230 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

8🔥2🥰2

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

14 Mar 2026, 19:31 UTC212 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5🔥1🥰1

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

14 Mar 2026, 19:30 UTC145 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ЭТО НЕ УЧЕБНАЯ ТРЕВОГА! ЭТО РЕАЛЬНО ТС2😍😍😍 Я ГОТОВА КРИЧАТЬ ОТ СЧАСТЬЯ МАЙКЛ ТЕРНЕР, ВЕРНИСЬ, Я НАБЬЮ ТАТУИРОВКУ НА ЛБУ! 😭😭😭 Кстати, это значит, что MOMMY IS COMING BACK💋 (тики токи возвращаются)

11🔥1🥰1

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

14 Mar 2026, 19:30 UTC169 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @official_romanceclubVideo

Город разделён на Новый и Старый, заражённый ядовитым цветком. Школьная журналистка исследует запретную зону и находит то, что долго скрывалось в тенях Сентфора. «Тени Сентфора 2 — Вне времени» Автор истории — Анна В., в прошлом ассистент сценариста в таких проектах, как «Дракула. История Любви» и «Там, где любовь горит вечно», под кураторством Алисы Ч. представляет долгожданный сиквел легендарной мистической истор

🔥2

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

12 Mar 2026, 06:11 UTC151 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ПОЖАЛУЙСТА ПУСТЬ ЭТО БУДЕТ ОТСЫЛКОЙ НА ТС2🙏✨😍😍😍😍😍 а еще как прикольно видеть своего фаворита в косплее на своего главного фаворита 💋

🔥73🥰1

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

31 Dec 2025, 20:32 UTC258 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

С Новым годом, мои хорошие❤️ Пусть Новый год будет более ярким и красочным, чем предыдущий❤️

16🔥6🥰3

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

3 Nov 2025, 09:28 UTC355 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вы все знаете как я обожаю Гарри Поттера, поэтому … хочу поделиться с вами своим сайтиком по вселенной Гарри Поттера 🕯️🖤 Можете потыкать на разделы и кнопочки-мне будет очень приятно 🥺💋

5

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

26 Oct 2025, 10:25 UTC272 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @yunakanecrVideo

🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Дорогая Арина, мы хотим от всей души сказать Вам спасибо за.... Ну сейчас Вы сами узнаете, за что) 🤗 🤎 Мы, вместе с @torrikm @mikoalemi @linareed @malbonterovna @il_maryana1 @crrinshiwa @fandabic @lalavla_da @ksu_pro_kr @tanushka_mouse1209 @clubromanceps @masterbunnys @iatevictor @mariiiiksm @hope_crr @lbubeyskie @jorik_kr @akotalking @novelsnowww @mamaofdiamonds @no_angel_VN @romanticgirlclub 🤎

2🔥1🥰1

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

26 Oct 2025, 10:25 UTC284 viewsread 9 August 2026

спасибо любимой Арине… 🥹

Signed 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪☀️

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @torrikm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,134,593 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кул стори от тори🖤” (@torrikm), 123 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/torrikm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.