Channel
@sheramerfys
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
357subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002674753841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sheramerfys |
| Description | снимаю по КР, обсуждаем визуальные новеллы и не только🧿 по поводу рекламы: @seldelrey |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sheramerfys |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 357 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 357 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 12 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
277 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 113 | 40.8% | |
| 💘 | 99 | 35.7% | |
| 💋 | 65 | 23.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 277reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2025 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
а у меня вчера ночью закончился Морок.. разочарование полнейшее СН3 пока в сторону отошел, если умрет Одри или Лэйн, я не выдержу снова проходить эти 90 серий.. СОГ вообще стоит проходит? советуешь? По поводу Морока… не жалею, что забросил эту историю на 2 сезоне. Извините, но это очень плохо. Имхо, но это самая худшая история Алисы.. sorry not sorry. Хотели повторить неожиданный финал как в Аркануме? No, babe… that…
💘16❤8💋7
⭐️Шпиливили с Таем😊
❤8💋6💘4
Тупо я, пропадаю на несколько месяцев, а потом появляюсь😊
💘10❤2💋2
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤4💋2
⭐️Шера, привет! Давно от тебя не было постов. Как ты? Видел обновление в кр? Проходил уже? Приветик! У меня всё хорошо, а вы как?? Совсем пропал, понимаю! Но, потихоньку возвращаюсь к прочтению визуальных новелл!! За это время в Лиге Мечтателей зафиналил Закона зверя (по моему мнению, это САМАЯ лучшая новелла, которую я когда либо читал), Колыбельную ведьм, и жду Никто не верит Норме В клуб романтики вернулся совсем…
💘16❤2💋2
Сказать мне нечего. Я с самого начала долбил о том, чтобы авторка взяла перерыв и вернулась с новыми силами, чтобы дописать уже эту несчастную историю. Но нет, зачем-то все это время (почти на протяжении года, если не больше) нас кормили по 1 серии, либо вовсе отсутствием. Минус еще одной причины бежать в кр, и минус любимый фаворит (Сет ты не виноват) Хорошего отдыха, и вообще всего самого наилучшего 💆🏻💆🏻💆🏻
❤31💘10
⭐️Дорогие, я вас понимаю. Сам пропал из тгк за что мне самому стыдно, признаюсь честно. Я не читаю сейчас визуальные новеллы от слова совсем. У меня нет сил и настроения на это. Но. Не обсудить эту новость с вами я не могу…
❤33💘5
⭐️Шера, привет! Пишу в анон, т.к стесняюсь в коммы - у тебя очень приятный голос, вот мурчащий прям + поставленная речь. Приятно слушать. Просто твоё голосвое насчёт Реми слушала, поэтому решила написать об этом. Кстати о Реми - соглашусь Ребят ну вы чего! Это голосовое было записано сразу после моего пробуждения😭 Спасибочки за такие приятные слова, очень рад слышать!💛
💋29❤13💘12
С веткой определились.
💋13💘6❤2
⭐️Никто не верит Норме Ребят, кто там хотел хорошего хоррора, который будет держать вас в напряжении всю серию? Пожалуйста! Господи, как же мне нравится! Я очень ДАВНО не испытывал такие чувства к новеллам. Прочитал пока что только 2 серии, но уже нравится. Ггшка суперская, характер очень нравится. Фаворитов пока увидел не всех, специально даже не гуглил, чтобы был сюрприз, но доктор вроде неплохой. Плюс сеттинг маг…
❤10💋4💘4
⭐️Обсуждаю истории Александры Реми. Почему я не собираюсь проходить кпс в этом обновлении?
💘16
Вы будете проходить кпс?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @sheramerfys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы будете проходить кпс?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2025 to 9 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,304,961 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“шера мерфис | кр” (@sheramerfys), 357 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheramerfys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.