Happy New Year, yβall!
π5π1

Channel
@tonybalogna
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
51subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001171619327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonybalogna |
| Description | As seen on Twitter blocklists |
| Created | 5 January 2020 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonybalogna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 51 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 October 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 10 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
81 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 21 | 25.9% | |
| π | 9 | 11.1% | |
| π | 8 | 9.88% | |
| πΎ | 6 | 7.41% | |
| π | 6 | 7.41% | |
| π | 6 | 7.41% | |
| π«‘ | 6 | 7.41% | |
| π― | 4 | 4.94% | |
| π’ | 4 | 4.94% | |
| π₯ | 3 | 3.70% | |
| π€£ | 3 | 3.70% | |
| π€¬ | 2 | 2.47% | |
| π | 1 | 1.23% | |
| π€ | 1 | 1.23% | |
| π€‘ | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2023 to 1 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Happy New Year, yβall!
π5π1
America is far from perfect, but itβs the greatest idea - built by the greatest people -history has ever seen. When we reconquer our birthright and restore it to Christβs domain, we will once again deliver the promise of a better world for mankind. Happy 4th!
πΎ6π«‘3β€2
WTF I got my Twitter back after almost 4 years
π3π1
Hello! I hope yβall are doing well this Easter season. The Lordβs resurrection after being beaten, tortured, humiliated, murdered is an example to all of us that we in our own way can also rise above the weight and horror of the world if we have faith; our ancestors did and we and our progeny will if we have the strength to resist the demons who haunt us today. A lot of masks have fallen off the past few months, peβ¦
β€6π2π―2π€‘1
In 1986, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published an article titled "The Physical Death of Jesus Christ.β It details the injuries described in the Gospels that Christ suffered during his Passion, explaining their pathology and scientific reality. For example, in Luke 22 it is written that Jesus was in great distress and sweating blood. Although rare, this is a condition called hematidrosis wβ¦
π6π₯1
Iβm Team Barbecue, LFGGGG ππΉ
π3π1
All those videos you see of an idyllic, high-trust society in Japan were once not unique to Japan. This is what is possible in a community/nation that has roots, shared struggle, a common future. Most of America was like this too at one time.
β€7π’1
Video, posted without a caption
π4
I hope everyone is having an amazing start to the Christmas season, when we celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ - the only promise for peace. As many of you know, this is a time of sadness and depression for many people. A big reason for that I have found is that the Beast System has diluted this time of year and turned it into a mindless offering of consumerism and endless secular platitudes. People miss the true rβ¦
β€6
π πΎπ»π π½π π °οΈπ πΈπ π πΌπ΄πΌπ΄π
π€£3
Me this time tomorrow night
π«‘3
Looks like The Guardian has decided to delete Obama bin Laden's "Letter to the American people" after 21 years because Zoomers discovered it and are talking about it on TikTok. But don't worry, it was archived before it was deleted. https://archive.is/rjKSc#selection-1269.1-1593.182 And if you don't trust an archive, I also uploaded it as a text file. Enjoy!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tonybalogna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βTony Hrvatska π΄πβ (@tonybalogna), 51 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonybalogna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.