Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐šƒ๐™ด๐š€๐š„๐™ธ๐™ป๐™ฐ ๐™ผ๐™พ๐™ฒ๐™บ๐™ธ๐™ฝ๐™ถ๐™ฑ๐™ธ๐š๐™ณ ๐™ธ๐™ธ๐™ธ . ๐Ÿ’…

@NotLasagnaDelRey

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

3,287subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001635493783
TypeChannel
Username@NotLasagnaDelRey
Created2 December 2021 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NotLasagnaDelRey

Growth

3,2873,3023,294.56 August 2026 โ€” 3,302 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 3,302 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 3,299 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 3,295 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 3,287 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 3,285โ€“3,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:483,287-8
10 Aug 2026, 02:263,295-4
7 Aug 2026, 07:253,299-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:523,302no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:543,302first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 June 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

608 reactions across 20 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ˜18129.8%
๐Ÿ’ฏ609.87%
๐Ÿ˜ข508.22%
๐Ÿคฃ498.06%
๐ŸŒš426.91%
๐Ÿฅฐ365.92%
๐Ÿ”ฅ264.28%
๐ŸŒญ233.78%
๐Ÿ‘182.96%
๐Ÿ’…182.96%
๐Ÿ˜จ182.96%
๐Ÿค—152.47%
๐Ÿ™ˆ111.81%
๐Ÿฅด101.64%
๐Ÿ–•81.32%
๐Ÿค”81.32%
๐Ÿ™‰60.987%
๐Ÿ‘Ž50.822%
๐Ÿ˜ญ50.822%
๐Ÿคก30.493%
10 further kinds162.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 608reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2025 to 14 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2025, 05:50 UTCโ‰ˆ5,530 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ˜Œ This channel has quietly passed away. Follow itโ€™s rebirth: ๐Ÿฅ€ https://t.me/TequilaGothicBird - Tequilapoo

๐Ÿ˜ข38๐Ÿ–•8๐Ÿค”4๐ŸŽ‰2โค1๐Ÿพ1๐ŸŽƒ1๐Ÿ’…1

13 Jun 2025, 20:45 UTCโ‰ˆ5,760 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘14๐Ÿฅด8๐Ÿ˜6๐ŸŒš2

13 Jun 2025, 20:43 UTCโ‰ˆ4,820 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿคฃ43๐Ÿ˜6๐Ÿ‘Ž1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

13 Jun 2025, 17:05 UTCโ‰ˆ3,720 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ’…17๐Ÿ™‰6

13 Jun 2025, 17:01 UTCโ‰ˆ3,350 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜27๐ŸŒญ5๐Ÿฅด2๐Ÿคฎ1๐Ÿ™ˆ1

13 Jun 2025, 17:01 UTCโ‰ˆ2,450 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜29๐ŸŒš3๐Ÿ˜ข1

13 Jun 2025, 16:56 UTCโ‰ˆ2,140 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ™ˆ10๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿฆ„1

13 Jun 2025, 16:56 UTCโ‰ˆ2,080 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜16

13 Jun 2025, 16:55 UTCโ‰ˆ3,310 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜25

13 Jun 2025, 16:30 UTCโ‰ˆ1,820 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ’ฏ19๐Ÿค”2

13 Jun 2025, 16:29 UTCโ‰ˆ1,790 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐ŸŒญ18๐Ÿ˜16๐Ÿฅฐ4๐Ÿ‘1

13 Jun 2025, 16:28 UTCโ‰ˆ1,650 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜9๐Ÿ˜ข5๐Ÿ˜ญ3๐Ÿค”2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NotLasagnaDelRey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 515,074 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐šƒ๐™ด๐š€๐š„๐™ธ๐™ป๐™ฐ ๐™ผ๐™พ๐™ฒ๐™บ๐™ธ๐™ฝ๐™ถ๐™ฑ๐™ธ๐š๐™ณ ๐™ธ๐™ธ๐™ธ . ๐Ÿ’…โ€ (@NotLasagnaDelRey), 3,287 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NotLasagnaDelRey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.