Penalties for round 1785941768 Round started: 05.08.2026 14:56:08 UTC Round ended: 06.08.2026 09:08:24 UTC No poorly performing validators in the round

Channel
TON Status Notifications
@tonstatus_notifications
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
334subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002232028426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonstatus_notifications |
| Description | Automatic notifications of penalties for poorly performing TON validators. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonstatus_notifications |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 334 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 334 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.9%
- avg views ÷ 334 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 79.9
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,598 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 541
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Penalties for round 1785876232 Round started: 04.08.2026 20:43:52 UTC Round ended: 05.08.2026 14:56:08 UTC No poorly performing validators in the round
Penalties for round 1785810696 Round started: 04.08.2026 02:31:36 UTC Round ended: 04.08.2026 20:43:52 UTC No poorly performing validators in the round
Penalties for round 1785745160 Round started: 03.08.2026 08:19:20 UTC Round ended: 04.08.2026 02:31:36 UTC No poorly performing validators in the round
Penalties for round 1785679624 Round started: 02.08.2026 14:07:04 UTC Round ended: 03.08.2026 08:19:20 UTC No poorly performing validators in the round
From July 26 through July 30, 2026, validator complaint notifications were not delivered due to an error. The issue was resolved on July 30. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Penalties for round 1785614088 Round started: 01.08.2026 19:54:48 UTC Round ended: 02.08.2026 14:07:04 UTC No poorly performing validators in the round
Penalties for round 1785548552 Round started: 01.08.2026 01:42:32 UTC Round ended: 01.08.2026 19:54:48 UTC No poorly performing validators in the round
Penalties for round 1785483016 Round started: 31.07.2026 07:30:16 UTC Round ended: 01.08.2026 01:42:32 UTC No poorly performing validators in the round
Penalties for round 1785417480 Round started: 30.07.2026 13:18:00 UTC Round ended: 31.07.2026 07:30:16 UTC Index: 52 ADNL: 05BCCA748DF734D0E6C0C7119296172597863A08794147FA66B0D25F64FF2C0B Efficiency: 0.0% Penalty: 101 TON Index: 13 ADNL: 808AC1DA8F365A5F87E6A757C6E30D37EB3D43E1111C367750A83957ED841D78 Efficiency: 67.98% Penalty: 101 TON Index: 4 ADNL: 277208C880039DB174574460EFCAC28ABB0BCE8F2330E5FB2964E8EA0A32…
Penalties for round 1785351944 Round started: 29.07.2026 19:05:44 UTC Round ended: 30.07.2026 13:18:00 UTC Index: 24 ADNL: 48EE4EE43FB7AE140AA98A450B5B84A077FFC2B3058031356387BF76832FF299 Efficiency: 66.21% Penalty: 101 TON Index: 52 ADNL: 05BCCA748DF734D0E6C0C7119296172597863A08794147FA66B0D25F64FF2C0B Efficiency: 0.0% Penalty: 101 TON Index: 60 ADNL: 63CCD8826AAAACF7B0DFDC1E983BF5EABC2B54062301D78CCCF944C0FEB…
Penalties for round 1785286408 Round's started: 29.07.2026 00:53:28 UTC Round's over: 29.07.2026 19:05:44 UTC No poor performing validators in the round
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonstatus_notifications. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,034,364 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON Status Notifications” (@tonstatus_notifications), 334 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonstatus_notifications.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.