🏳️ Gram Wallet in Telegram is ready and is now accessible to a select group of users. 🤩 We'll be gradually rolling it out to our billion+ users over the next couple of weeks. ⚡️ Thanks to the validators who approved the smart contract that powers it, future upgrades of the wallet won't require painful migrations. This is just one of the innovations we've built to make non-custodial wallets usable ✨

Channel
Tgram 🔜 The Open Network
@Tgram
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
15,494subscribers
-83 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001040290286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tgram |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tgram |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 15,494 | -4 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 15,498 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 15,500 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 15,505 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 15,510 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 15,514 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 15,518 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 15,524 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 15,528 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:04 | 15,532 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:46 | 15,535 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 15,542 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 15,546 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 15,547 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 15,548 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 15,549 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 15,548 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 15,549 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 15,553 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 15,552 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 15 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.42%
- avg views ÷ 15,494 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 994
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (15 January 2025 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 994 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 59s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
💎 TON’s native currency is becoming Gram. 🤑 Gram was the original name of TON’s currency in the first white paper. 🌱 We’re returning to our roots — and starting a new chapter. ✈️ This rebranding will pave the way for what comes next. ⏳ The transition will take around 3 weeks. 💪 TON remains the name of the blockchain. 🪙 This is step 4 of 7 to Make TON Great Again.
1️⃣ 💎 2️⃣ Это одни из самых ярких реализаций по-настоящему массовых и полезных блокчейн-продуктов. На их создание командам понадобилось всего несколько лет. Вспомните, с чего всё начиналось. С развитием AI всё будет только ускоряться...
🏪 Кэшбэк за оплату по QR-коду Теперь каждая оплата через 🏪 QR-код приносит вам баллы кэшбэка – до 5% и $150 в месяц. Как это работает: • Оплачивайте покупки по QR-коду в любом магазине через 👛 Crypto Bot. • За каждую оплату вы получаете баллы кэшбэка. • Накопленные баллы можно обменять на ☺️ USDT прямо в приложении. Чем больше вы платите – тем выше ваш уровень и процент кэшбэка. Подробнее о кэшбэке ›
Все немного напряглись и подумали очередной TON Play ? Но потом протерли глаза и выдохнули... Спасибо, команде TON Pay за действительно полезный продукт на блокчейн.
💎 TON Pay уже работает Это не пункт дорожной карты. Не «скоро выйдет». Доступно прямо сейчас. Moongate уже использует TON Pay для продажи билетов на Gateway 2026. ▪️ Оплата с помощью $TON или $USDT ▪️ Единая форма оплаты ▪️ Мгновенное зачисление на TON Так выглядит TON Pay в деле 🔥 Gateway Билеты | Moongate билеты | Tribute билеты | Gateway | Бронирование отелей TON Foundation Toncoin чат | TON CIS Builders | T…
🚀 Возможно, это лучшее время для старта Сейчас у нас не хватает времени реализовать все идеи и проекты, которые были запланированы. Поэтому решили выставить домены — возможно, именно они станут фундаментом для вашего следующего массового продукта на блокчейне TON. Иногда лучшее время для подготовки нового проекта — именно во время затишья. 💼 Отадим домены в хорошие руки: TON.center TON.monster TON.wiki TON.my TON…
❄️ Криптозима приходит и уходит… Рынок остывает. Энтузиазм стихает. Многие компании и блокчейн-проекты переключили фокус на AI — и это закономерно. Технологический маятник качнулся в сторону искусственного интеллекта. Но это не означает, что криптозима будет вечной. Скорее наоборот — AI способен ускорить развитие блокчейн-проектов. Разработка стала быстрее, инструменты — мощнее, а барьеры входа — ниже. Это значит,…
Команда TON Core была рада помочь Chainlink с технической интеграцией их продукта в TON. Смарт-контракты Chainlink написаны на нашем новом языке Tolk. Параллельно мы внесли свой вклад в подготовку еще трех крупных и ожидаемых релизов — все с буквой «C» в конце или начале.
Тем временем работа кипит в самом ядре TON core: Команда TON Core работает над тем, чтобы операции в блокчейне TON выполнялись быстрее 1 секунды — без снижения децентрализации и масштабируемости. Мы расширили команду ядра и продолжаем реализовывать roadmap оптимизаций, опубликованный и частично выполненный ранее в этом году. Впереди — крупные обновления L1 и API. Планируем показать результаты в основой сети TON уже…
📢 Новый проект "Cocoon" анонсировали на Blockchain Life На конференции Blockchain Life Павел Дуров рассказал о новом проекте Cocoon, который будет запущен в ноябре 2025 года. Это не просто очередной сервис, а амбициозная идея, которая может кардинально изменить рынок искусственного интеллекта. И, конечно, связан с TON — блокчейном, который теперь получает всё больше реальных применений. 🚀 Что такое Cocoon? Cocoon …
🚨 Масштабная компрометация npm‑пакетов — 2 миллиарда загрузок под угрозой. Серьёзная атака на экосистему npm: были скомпрометированы пакеты, суммарно имеющие более 2 миллиардов еженедельных загрузок. Все они принадлежат одному разработчику. 🧨 Затронутые версии пакетов: backslash 0.2.1 chalk-template 1.1.1 supports-hyperlinks 4.1.1 has-ansi 6.0.1 simple-swizzle 0.2.3 color-st…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Tgram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
TON в 2025
- Войдет в топ 330%
- топ 524%
- топ 1046%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2025 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@durov · 10,721,3993 postsАнатолий Макосов
@anatolii_makosov · 18,0492 postsTON Core
@toncore · 6,9122 postsTelegram Contests
@contest · 299,0421 postНовости Crypto Bot
@cryptobotru · 2,327,8221 postCrypto Bot
@send · 1,468,6521 postToncoin Чат
@toncoin_rus_chat · 10,0931 postTON Status Notifications
@tonstatus_notifications · 3281 postTribute
@tribute · 1,796,2951 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tgram 🔜 The Open Network” (@Tgram), 15,494 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tgram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.