Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Болевая Точка 📍

Channel

Болевая Точка 📍

@tochka_boli

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

455subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002569585613
TypeChannel
Username@tochka_boli
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tochka_boli

Growth

4554614586 August 2026 — 461 subscribers6 August 2026 — 461 subscribers13 August 2026 — 455 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 454–462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:27455-6
6 Aug 2026, 19:04461no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:47461first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 455 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.4
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held7 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total542
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1724.3%
😡1622.9%
🙏1217.1%
👍811.4%
45.71%
🔥45.71%
😱45.71%
🤝34.29%
💯11.43%
😢11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kundepPhoto

🏠 Межевание придомовой территории: что изменилось и почему действовать нужно сейчас! Те, кто интересуется, уже знают, что в законодательстве Москвы по межеванию произошли серьезные изменения. Речь про постановление № 1260-ПП, которое внесло существенные изменения в порядок межевания территорий. Страшилки про межевание «по отмостке» и исключение придомовой территории из прав собственности стали реальностью. Новые пр

🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC36 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @save_rublevoPhoto

Тюмень без воды. Москве - приготовиться... Пока жители Тюмени из-за паводка и попадания в воду органических загрязнений выстаиваются в очереди за питьевой водой, в Москве активно забивают в берег сваи и роют котлованы в 1Б поясе зоны санитарной охраны Рублевской станции водоподготовки. Без утвержденной проектной документации, без экологической экспертизы, без разрешения на строительство строится мост для СберСити.

🤬10🔥1😢1

30 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC86 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @archnadzor_official

Развыявление-15: лучшее в мире метро Год назад, сразу после шумного празднования 90-летия Московского метрополитена, из 48 исторических станций метро на государственной охране остались 17 станций - памятников регионального значения. Остальные станции (их перронные залы и вестибюли) имели только статус выявленных объектов культурного наследия. Все они «развыявлены» в числе более чем 1300 зданий и сооружений, в силу

29 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kupriyanov888Photo

Кузьминский лесопарк под видом «благоустройства»превращают в коммерческую площадку 💸В апреле 2026 года в Кузьминский лесопарк, как и во многие леса и парки Москвы, без учёта мнения жителей началось то, что официально именуется «благоустройством». Однако за этим словом, уже успевшим стать для горожан синонимом произвола, скрывается планомерное уничтожением нетронутой природы ради коммерческого освоения. 🚧 Уже нескол

🙏3😡1

25 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC103 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @andreydvornikovPhoto

Пруд в Коробковском саду простоял несколько сотен лет. Пришла собянинская власть - решили засыпать. Вот спрашивается зачем? Чем мешал им приусадебный пруд??? М.б. для того чтобы через два года его откопать и с помпой благоустроить?

😡14😱2💯1🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC122 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nedvizhaPhoto

Беспредел управляющей компании в новостройке А101: результаты собрания обнулили, а голоса скупают по 300 рублей! Жители А101 оказались в настоящем капкане, устроенном управляющей компанией. В то время как ключи от дома задержали до января 2026 года вместо обещанного июня 2025-го, собственники провели легитимное общее собрание. Все как один проголосовали за смену УК, установили адекватные тарифы и охрану. Но их закон

🤬74😱2😡1

22 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC95 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bereg_nashPhoto

Друзья! Давайте поддержим наших коллег по несчастью с противоположного берега. Парк Дружба под угрозой застройки. Парк включили в КРТ и хотят застроить домами, офисными зданиями, торговыми точками и сделать сеть дорог!!!😡 Это единственное зелёное пространство для жителей районов Головинский, Ховрино, Левобережный. Жители противостоят бездушной гигантской машине, которая за прибылью не видит людей. Им нужен парк, ч

👍8🙏8🤝3🔥1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @tochka_boli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 110,713 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Болевая Точка 📍” (@tochka_boli), 455 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tochka_boli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.