Channel
@tnaghad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
671subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001488137901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tnaghad |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tnaghad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 671 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 671 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (26 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 936 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 36.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 26.3% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دکتر دورهی ژئوپلتیک هم داره 😕 نگرانی من اینه که وقتی این اراذل و دلاقکه رو هجو می کنم ، بیش از اونکه باعث بشه مردم بشناسن شون و ازشون دوری کنن ، بعضیا - که ذهن تحلیلی قوی ندارن- کنجکاو بشن و جذبشون بشن t.me/JAAMEbaaz/8171 t.me/JAAMEbaaz/8164
🎈 دوره ژئوپلتیک استاد محمدحسین ادیب 🔴 اینکه ادم بتونه اینجور پشت هم لاطائلات بگه خودش یه تواناییه بهرحال این آدم نسبت به یه سری آدمای رذل باهوش تره و خب قانون طبیعت اینه که توانایی/هوش با دستاورد یه همبستگی هایی داره. ⚠️خیلیا دوس دارن با کلاهبرداری هم شده پولدار بشن ولی نمیتونن ✅ولی کاش انقدر قوانین طبیعت ( از جمله این قانون که در طبیعت تصادف/شانس خیلی تعیین کننده ست. ) انقدر گاهی ظالمانه و چپکی نبود . ⚠️ فعلا …
👏1
⚠️ سریع القلم نئو لیبرال ادمین: ➖ حرفی نیس شما برو با حشد الشعبی و حوثی ها دمخور شو ببینیم کجا رو میگیری ولی از پول ما خرج نکن -- -- حرومزاده باشه؟ ➖ طرف هنوز تو دهه ۵۰ سیر میکنه که لیبرال و نئو لیبرال فحش ناموس بود. چشم کورش نمیبینه که چین مائو هم فهمیده نمیشه بدون اقتصاد آزاد شکم مردم رو سیر کرد. ➖ پیشفرض منقلی دوران قبیله گیش اینه ک: منابع و منافع در جهان ثابته هرکس به ثروت رسیده حق دیگرانی رو خورده. [ در…
👍1
🟢در نکوهش آن ناشسته روی ناسزاگو ✍🏻دکتر عبدالکریم سروش بنام خدا 🔱سخن گفت و دشمن بدانست و دوست که در شهر نادان تر از او هموست اخیراً فرد گستاخی بنام موسی غنی نژاد در گفتگویی تلویزیونی دکتر علی شریعتی را شیاد خوانده و بر او خرده جاهلانه گرفته است که چرا از زبان شخص موهومی بنام شاندل، حرفهای خود را میزند و خوانندگان را اغراء به جهل میکند وی برین شنعت آشکار یاوههای دیگر هم افزوده است از جمله اینکه ،شریعتی اسلام شناس نبو…
👍3
🔰 مسئله رو درست مطرح کنیم. اوضاع از این حرفا گذشته منتها برای تنویر افکار عمومی یه نکته بگم : وقتی که یک نفر ( چه سپاهی چه غیر سپاهی ) حس کنه که اوضاع ممکنه از این هم بدتر بشه دو حالت بیشتر نداره : ۱- کنار وامیسته و تماشا میکنه ۲- میره طرف حکومت ( هر چقدر هم که نارضایتی داشته باشه و فساد دیده باشه ) در مواقع خاصی این احتمال هست که طرف بگه : بگذار هرچی میخواد بشه . خطور این فکر به ذهن ، استثناست. قاعده ن…
👍1
🎈 ماجرای من و بیژن!؟ #زیدآبادی ➖ #عبدالکریمی از ساینس گرایی افراطی تا ذات گرایی افراطی ➖ نقش بیژن در نمایش حکومت مرتجع #فلسفه_قاره_ای چند سال پیش یه فایلی از عبدالکریمی پخش شد که در تلویزیون به انتقاد تند از حکومت پرداخته بود ( با این عنوان هیجانی که : شانس بیاره ممنوع الکار نشه ) همون روز گفتم جوگیر نشیم با عبدالکریمی نمیشه رفت سیزده بدر این لینک ش : t.me/Rfekri/297 @Rfekri || نخبگان معاصر ملت @ZIRsigari_…
نباشم گر در این محفل چه غم ؟ دیوانه ای کمتر خوش آن روزی زخاطرها روم ، افسانه ای کمتر بگو برق بلاخیزی بسوزد خرمن عمرم بگرد شمع هستی بی خبر پروانه ای کمتر تو ای تیر قضا صیدی زمن بهتر کجا جویی به کنج این قفس مرغ نچیده دانه ای کمتر چه خواهد شد نباشد گر چو من مرغ سخنگویی نوایی کم ،غمی کم ، ناله مستانه ای کمتر ز جمع خود برانیدم که همدردی نمیبینم میان آشنایان جهان بیگانه ای کمتر تو ای سقف کبود اسمان بر سر خرابم شو پ…
❤1👏1
کانال غیر فعال میشه و امید که غیر فعال بمونه
شد ۶۶۶ تا 🥶🤭
❤1😢1😱1
منطق پایهی همهی معارف بشره. و بحث مغالطات اصلیترین بخش منطق کاربردی در اینجا به کاربردی ترین شکل و خلاصه ترین و بدون هزینه ترین حالت ، باین موضوع پرداخته میشه. ۶۶۸ تا عضو - که افزایش اهسته و پیوسته شم قطع شده - رمقی می ذاره برای آدم ؟! @Tnaghad | مثال زندهی مغالطات @persian_organon | معرفت شناسی کاربردی
❤5🤯1😢1
▪️دو طرف در جنگن یک طرف کلا اینترنت رو قطع میکنه مردمشوو تهدید میکنه ک اگر چیزی خلاف اونچه من دوست دارم بگید (تبلیغ علیه نظام) پدرتونو در میارم و ما میدونیم که تهدیدش الکی نیست. و بعد با خیال راحت ، آشکارا برعکس واقعیت رو میگه. طرف دیگه هم شاید یه چاخان هایی بکنه یه جاهایی اغراق کنه یا کوچک نمایی کنه. چون رسانه ها - نه تنها در کنترلش نیستن - بخاطر چپگرایی ذاتی روشنفکری ، سوگیری دارند که دستاوردهاشو کوچک ن…
❌ نمونه ای از قصه گرایی و استفاده ی فله از واژه ی روایت 👇👇👇🫱🫱 «دوگانگی واقعیت و ادراک» وقتی توافق امضا میشود اما واقعیت هنوز در حال مذاکره است! از اسلامآباد تا میدان جنگ روایتها مهدی مطهرنیا تفاهمنامه اسلامآباد را نمیتوان صرفاً یک توافق سیاسی یا دیپلماتیک دانست؛ این رویداد را باید در سطحی عمیقتر، بهعنوان ورود رسمی بازیگران به مرحلهای نوین از منازعه تحلیل کرد: «مرحله جنگ روایتها». جایی که دیگر وا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tnaghad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 42,380 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شیادان بی شرم ( مثال زندهی مغالطات ، تفکر نقادانه ، فن جدل )” (@tnaghad), 671 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tnaghad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.