Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LH TIPSTER ⚽️

Channel

LH TIPSTER ⚽️

@tipsterlh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,357subscribers

-113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001686037928
TypeChannel
Username@tipsterlh
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tipsterlh

Growth

7,3577,4707,413.57 August 2026 — 7,470 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,463 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,447 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,419 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,384 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,372 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,357 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 17 days, net -113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,340–7,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 13:147,357-15
21 Aug 2026, 00:357,372-12
18 Aug 2026, 04:427,384-35
14 Aug 2026, 19:337,419-28
11 Aug 2026, 01:467,447-16
8 Aug 2026, 01:007,463-7
7 Aug 2026, 08:317,470first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 7,357 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held26 (26 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total30,138
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC488 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

EAI, FLUZAO PASSA?

  1. NUNCA 😂49%
  2. VAI PASSAR 🔴🟢⚪️54%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC490 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

➡️FLUZAO MUITO PRESSIONADO NA LIBERTA! 🔥🔥 Time saiu da CDB, único título possível pra eles é a Libertadores, mas muito difícil

9 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

1u❌ https://www.bet365.bet.br/#/IP/EV151371503112C1

6 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

1u✅ https://www.bet365.bet.br/#/IP/EV151370775742C1

6 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

EAI, Corinthians reverte?

  1. CLARO 🦅40%
  2. NÃO 👍🏼38%
  3. IMPOSSÍVEL 😂24%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @tipsterlh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@tipsterlh edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

EAI, FLUZAO PASSA?

  1. NUNCA 😂49%
  2. VAI PASSAR 🔴🟢⚪️54%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTCAnonymous Poll88 voters

EAI, Corinthians reverte?

  1. CLARO 🦅40%
  2. NÃO 👍🏼38%
  3. IMPOSSÍVEL 😂24%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LUKA MAGIC🪄 FREE
@lukamagictips · 144,412
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
THIERRY REGRAS
@bingothierryregras · 69,816
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Gustavo - Análises
@gstvbc2 · 66,404
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
Maria Tips Free🔥
@ahmariatps · 50,849
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
Apostas e Palpites - Futebol
@apostasepalpites · 214,478
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
João da Info🗞
@joaodainfotips · 57,975
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
PaivaTips ⚽️🏀
@paivatipsss · 78,121
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LH TIPSTER ⚽️” (@tipsterlh), 7,357 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tipsterlh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.