Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 59 days, net -4,635. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,734–68,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 07:18
63,431
-518
28 Sept 2026, 20:58
63,949
-786
18 Sept 2026, 00:57
64,735
-120
15 Sept 2026, 21:56
64,855
-157
14 Sept 2026, 04:16
65,012
-131
12 Sept 2026, 10:40
65,143
-134
10 Sept 2026, 09:22
65,277
-282
7 Sept 2026, 01:56
65,559
-102
4 Sept 2026, 07:19
65,661
-96
2 Sept 2026, 18:13
65,757
-80
1 Sept 2026, 18:25
65,837
-92
31 Aug 2026, 14:58
65,929
+22
30 Aug 2026, 11:45
65,907
-98
29 Aug 2026, 08:44
66,005
-75
28 Aug 2026, 08:07
66,080
-93
27 Aug 2026, 05:39
66,173
-96
26 Aug 2026, 02:24
66,269
-135
25 Aug 2026, 00:39
66,404
-184
23 Aug 2026, 11:58
66,588
-101
22 Aug 2026, 02:12
66,689
first reading
Engagement
1,279 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.78%
avg views ÷ 63,431 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,760
425 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.179%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
425
of 1,279 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 275 of 425 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
1,279 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
749,493
Reactions total
890
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 16:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈16,000
Videos
≈100
Links
≈13,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,392 reactions across 662 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,083
45.3%
🙏
333
13.9%
🔥
332
13.9%
👍
257
10.7%
👏
205
8.57%
🤝
36
1.51%
👨💻
35
1.46%
🎉
27
1.13%
🫡
26
1.09%
🥰
19
0.794%
✍
12
0.502%
🏆
12
0.502%
😍
12
0.502%
🤩
3
0.125%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 677 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,392 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pessoal, está aberta no Senado a consulta pública sobre a MPV 1.394/2026, que proíbe a exploração das apostas de quota fixa no Brasil.
Para quem quiser se manifestar sobre a medida, a votação está disponível no portal oficial do Senado.
📌 NÃO = rejeição à MP e à proibição do mercado de apostas legalizado.
É muito importante que quem trabalha no setor conheça a proposta, participe do debate e registre seu posiciona…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,279 posts we hold for @gstvbc2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@gstvbc2 edited 100 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
THIERRY REGRAS @bingothierryregras · 66,654 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
R10 Score @r10score · 34,851 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
THOR BET - MARRETA FREE ⚽️ @ThorTip · 18,989 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 3 October 2026
BetMoney TIPS FREE ✅ @betmooney365 · 18,931 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 October 2026
LUKA O MAGIC 🪄🔥 @lukamagicbrasil · 186,461 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
LIMAO COM SAL 🍋 @pobreapostador · 20,225 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 3 October 2026
ASSIS @WallstreetBr · 20,715 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 September 2026
HELDER DA BET - FREE @escalagreen · 32,027 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 September 2026
João da Info🗞 @joaodainfotips · 57,269 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
PABLO TIPS FREE ⚽️ @pablotipspunterfree · 27,871 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
BOLEIROS TIPS @boleirostips · 45,699 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
Danilo Martins - Gratuito 🧑💻 @daniloqa · 24,059 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
paivatipsss @paivatipsss · 3 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
Freitas Tips ⚽️🏟️🔞 @freitasipter00 · 33,230 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gustavo - Análises” (@gstvbc2), 63,431 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gstvbc2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.