Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Тимуроки: чтобы писать отличные тексты

@timuroki

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,885subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001278072679
TypeChannel
Username@timuroki
Created19 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/timuroki

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Тимуроки — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

1,8791,8851,8826 August 2026 — 1,884 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,884 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,879 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,885 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,878–1,886 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:471,885+6
9 Aug 2026, 10:071,879-5
6 Aug 2026, 12:301,884no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:371,884first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 1,885 subscribers
Avg views / post
343
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (21 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,087
Reactions total150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

395 reactions across 21 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13935.2%
😁8020.3%
🔥6717.0%
👍6315.9%
❤‍🔥133.29%
😢123.04%
🤓82.03%
61.52%
😱30.759%
👏20.506%
🙏10.253%
🤝10.253%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 21 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timuroki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC142 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чуть больше недели я в Москве, с интересом наблюдаю за очередными вариациями «контролировать использование языка». 1. Пока что возглавляет рейтинг эта вот картинка. Мегамозги, конечно: хорошо выбрали время отменять ругань. Особенно нравится слово «очнись». Очнись, создай ситуацию, которой в истории не было нигде и никогда! Как тут спел бы Семён Слепаков, а чо бля если нет? 2. Следом сервис доставки запрещает в св

😁186🔥5

3 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC272 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Гомерически вездесущие Нолан с Дэймоном заставили задуматься: а бренды какие-нибудь рискнули использовать гекзаметр в свежих кампаниях? В античные времена гуляла по ЖЖ шутка про дописку к объявлению: «Здесь за углом продаются решётки стальные // Их для дворца своего покупал шлемоблещущий Гектор». Ведь, как любая форма, гекзаметр ляжет на любое содержание: Скорость, богиня, воспой и упорство курьеров: Молниеноснее

😁21

31 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC304 views27 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Многоглазое чтение Перечитывать написанное не со своей («авторской») позиции, а с позиций других людей (как будто бы ненадолго становясь этими другими людьми) — важное умение. Я о нём уже писал, но в прошлый раз не рассказал, какие способы тут можно пробовать. Задача: увидеть текст словно в первый раз, чтобы бросились в глаза его логические сбои и прочие ошибки. Не замечает их автор, потому что писать текст — трудо

👍15🔥75

29 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC323 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Искал на ночь глядя издательские оценки по самым большим тиражам в истории (с точными тиражами всё сложно). Выяснилось, что читал я из топ-10 только три книги (угадайте, кстати, какие). А у вас сколько вышло? 1 «Повесть о двух городах», Диккенс (1859) — 200+ млн 2 «Маленький принц», Сент-Экзюпери (1943) — ~200 млн 3 «Алхимик», Коэльо (1988) — ~150 млн 4 «Гарри Поттер и философский камень», Роулинг (1997) — ~120 млн

🤓84

26 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC397 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А у вас есть полезная напоминалка? // Раньше я немного расстраивался, находя ошибочку в уже опубликованном тексте. Но потом на моём прогулочном маршруте к морю появилась такая витрина. И я такой: «Тимур, ну вот outstanding люди годами обещают striving to be the best at WATEVER they do*, и ничего, нормально им. Ты-то хоть исправляешь свои ошибки». Так я перестал расстраиваться, спасибо, риэлторы, хоть какая-то от

😁17

21 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC449 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

С утра решил: сегодня или никогда! Уже два с половиной года (даже больше — 2 пойнт 8) не обновлял коллекцию с описаниями профильных книжек (её начало, продолжение). Не раз и не два собирался продолжить, конечно :) Никогдакать без серьёзной причины не стоит, сами знаете: never say never. Так что вот вам ещё не остывшие* тексты свежего библиотечного обновления: Стивен Прессфилд — Nobody wants to read your shit «Но

👍74🤝1

17 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC410 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Не о чем писать» (или «да о чем я могу написать?..») — это боль, с которой приходят часто. То ни одной идеи, то слишком много идей — и сложно выбрать… В первые месяцы после старта блога или рассылки обычно всем хватает тем для постов. Потом начинаются пробуксовки, паузы, набранные подписчики начинают разбегаться, короче, грусть, печаль и самокритика. И вроде бы должны существовать хорошие инструкции на такой случа

8👍4🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC390 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

До чего дошел прогресс 😱

👍6😱3😁1

15 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC400 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @silamedia

Posted without readable text

5🔥3

14 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC387 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вдогонку к предыдущему: разверну пункт №2 («Не + антоним» → слово с прямым значением: «не запомнил» → «забыл»). Во-первых, для напоминания себе: я сам часто забываю вычистить все отрицания, которые стоит вычистить. Почему вообще их вычищаю? Потому что писать «не соглашаюсь» вместо «отказываюсь» удваивает количество читательских усилий. Сначала читатель должен зафиксировать внимание на значении «соглашаюсь», а потом

13👍7

11 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC456 views39 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Хитрости хирургии (мелкие) // Сегодня (как и всегда) полезно перечитать пост о технических, а не смысловых правках. А потом прочесть его продолжение. Вот оно, с новыми способами резать и клеить: Свёртка конструкций 1. Двоеточие + прямая речь вместо косвенной: «Редактор сказал, что так нельзя» → «Редактор: „так нельзя“». 2. «Не + антоним» → слово с прямым значением: - «не запомнил» → «забыл»; - «не разрешили» →

19🔥136🙏1

8 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC438 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати о слове «гомозится» — заметили его в прошлом посте? Я его открыл для себя зимой, когда в нашем книжном клубе решили перечитать «Обломова». Обломов, как известно, гомозиться — в смысле, суетиться — не любил. В июне мы читали «Доктора Живаго», и там уже в тексте всплыла «гомозня». А на прошлой неделе я дочитал (в гордом одиночестве, без клуба) бумажную «Тревожную куколку», где в последнем эссе о Соколове есть

🔥10😁10👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @timuroki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 683,293 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тимуроки: чтобы писать отличные тексты” (@timuroki), 1,885 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timuroki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.