Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

探花 TV 📸

@thxiha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,328subscribers

+178 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003602805002
TypeChannel
Username@thxiha
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thxiha

Growth

4,1504,3284,2396 August 2026 — 4,150 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,164 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,261 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,328 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,123–4,355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:064,328+67
9 Aug 2026, 23:354,261+97
7 Aug 2026, 04:034,164+14
6 Aug 2026, 14:344,150first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.84%
avg views ÷ 4,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
210
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
42
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held42 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total8,802
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7h 16m
Average length
15m 35s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Advertising

Ad load
23.8%
10 of 42 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
75.0
over 10 measured posts
Median views · rest
237
over 32 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC221 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

#OnlyFans #FortuneCutie 表妹在家玩游戏 不小心被插什么东西进来了

8 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC237 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

#OnlyFans #FortuneCutie 女室友自慰到一半被爆操 美美的脸纤细的腰

8 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC201 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

#DemiFairyTW 超主动的后辈OL用完美肉体玩弄身为处男的我可爱又色情的绝伦服务

8 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC240 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

#OnlyFans #FortuneCutie 小骚货在公共桑拿房勾引我 对白刺激 被爆操射满

8 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC198 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

#DemiFairyTW 女学生下课兼职 JK纯白小内裤又纯又欲

8 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC183 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

#下面有根棒棒糖 #Loliiiiipop99 性爱充值1-2

8 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC160 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

#小宝寻花 绿衣服苗条白皙妹子 AI高清画质2K修复 #探花 小宝 @btlot

8 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC155 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

#国产 刚成年18极品小萝莉,被两大汉各种操

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @thxiha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 193,692 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“探花 TV 📸” (@thxiha), 4,328 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thxiha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.