用户信息 👤 ID: 1095918715 Username: wuWangJiu (1) 历史变动 5 条 🎭 Username: First: 木于 Last: 2026-02-12 Username: First: 傻逼不看上下文 Last: 2026-02-17 Username: First: 欲吟一句恐成狱 Last: 乌诗台 2026-03-25 Username: First: 今复乌台 Last: 2026-08-06 Username: wuWangJiu First: 今复乌台 Last: 关联群组 96 条 👥 [私密群组] 🦸🏼♂️ 沙雕英雄群 [私密群组] 『NSFW』胴dòng体的秘密 [私密群组] -华人论政- [私密群组] 猫猫色图品鉴群 (pussy) [私密群组] 高潮合集/视频合集/av剪辑 Chat [私密群组] non…

Channel
Rays data
@laomu1021
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003781646641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @laomu1021 |
| Description | 老目数据库 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/laomu1021 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 140.0%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.4
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (27 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 109
- Videos
- 93
- Links
- 110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2h 12m
- Average length
- 33m 12s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
https://tghao.com/ 这个几块钱一个号。 买了两个,实测用了三四个月,完全没问题。
https://t.me/fengjianjing1113
❗️❗️高颜御姐艾琳直播现场 阳痿男求女神玩弄他老婆 女神艾琳带着假屌各种调教他的骚妻 #高颜值 #御姐 #调教
#七天眼镜妹 #探花 #精品 眼镜妹 @thxiha @btlot #经典 #合集
https://t.me/donggujun/4921
https://t.me/qgjd_bot
综合机器人用 @sha520bot 内含功能: 核验类(全部企业接口) 1. 人脸核验 0.1分/次 2. 名字 身份证 核验 0.01分/次 3. 名字 手机号 核验 0.05/次 4. 名字 手机号 身份证 核验 0.05/次 5. 银行卡二三四要素核验 0.06/次 综合功能类 1. 联通机主查询 1分/个(24小时秒)❗️❗️ 2. 抖音号反手机号 1分/个(凌晨12发车 隔天早12回车) 3. 三网名下手机号 1分/个(一天两批 包不遗漏) 4. 全国真大头 1分/个 (07:00-19:30) 1u=1分 欢迎使用! 支持Okpay USDT 充值双通道 秒到账! 持续更新,后续会加入更多功能…… 【查档看下面👇频道置顶】 杀神本人 @shashen 业务频道 @SSCD66 模板频道 @SSCD68
一只顶美 高颜值美乳性感女神上门服务 #X #一只顶美
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @laomu1021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@btlot · 100,8591 postChatGPT 中文社区
@chatgpt_jwgpt3_cn · 35,1691 post幻梦AI官方交流新群
@HmAIMate · 78,4181 post极搜🔍资源搜索sousou
@JS01011 · 69,8511 postNoahGlocourt
@NoahGlocourt · 91 post吃瓜爆料🍉
@qiqubook · 45,6951 post杀神殿 源头批发查档频道
@sscd66 · 98,2241 post杀神模板频道
@sscd68 · 4,7901 post探花 TV 📸
@thxiha · 4,3281 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 6
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@laomu1021 named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rays data” (@laomu1021), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laomu1021.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.