Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Та самая звездочка

@thisisstarlite

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002199348222
TypeChannel
Username@thisisstarlite
DescriptionСпециально для иноагентов, экстремистов, террористов, нежелательных и запрещенных в России организаций
Created19 June 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/thisisstarlite

Growth

1216 August 2026 — 121 subscribers9 August 2026 — 121 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:45121no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:49121first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 19 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

815 reactions across 12 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥41951.4%
👍11414.0%
🤡769.33%
😁668.10%
💯263.19%
242.94%
🤝202.45%
🎉131.60%
🖕121.47%
🎄111.35%
👏80.982%
💊70.859%
❤‍🔥60.736%
👀50.613%
🤯30.368%
🌭20.245%
🍌20.245%
🍾10.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 815reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2024 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Apr 2026, 06:48 UTC972 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Особенно если это вы!

❤‍🔥6💯1

12 Apr 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,050 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Никогда не недооценивайте ебаных клоунов и деятельных идиотов!

💯14

24 Mar 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,380 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вот, кстати, яркий пример хуятины, мало того что анонимной, так еще и мнящей себя экспертом в "очень сложных" журналистско-пиарских материях. Такое ощущение, что на твоих глазах подросток впервые бреется, а потом еще раз и еще раз. И начинает шупать мягкими пальцами твердеющую щетину. В общем, какой-то кружок долго взрослеющих детей.

💊1

10 Mar 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,740 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Понятно, к слову, что все боятся за бабки, в связи с этой истерией про МАХ. Мол, как же, мы потеряем бабки. Я уже как-то раскладывал экономику. Не будет бабок там, где от аудитории осталось 5-10%. Это так не работает и не будет работать. И лояльной аудитории не будет. В МАХ можно растить базу с нуля. Не начиная диалог с обмана или унижения. А пытаться перетащить тех, кто полюбил тебя не за блядство - плохая ид

👍9🤡3💊1

22 Jan 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,970 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вот сегодня был момент «Знаю лишнее!». Но решил оставить его в себе. Оказывается большинство историй вообще не нужно никому рассказывать. Это вообще интересный момент медийной профессии. Есть, конечно, личности, которые выходят за счет каких-то личных разборок. Но это не путь самурая.

💯5👍2🤡1

20 Jan 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,770 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Или вот еще есть забавное искажение у журналистов. В какой-то момент времени им начинает казаться, что они знают гораздо больше, чем им положено. В этот момент в журналисте зарождается мысль: Заведу себе анонимный канал и буду рассказывать правду! К счастью эта хуйня в Telegram уже заканчивается.

🎄6💊2

20 Jan 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,830 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Знаете, лет пятнадцать-двадцать назад с большим интересом читал разные излияния журналистов о том, как пиарщикам надо с ними работать. А был еще жанр со стороны пиарщиков, как к ним должны подходить журналисты. И самое забавное, что за двадцать лет эти "тексты" ни капельки не изменились. В итоге, чисто внутренне, сразу вычеркиваю для себя журналистов, которые пишут правила общения с ними. И таких же пиарщиков. Ни

🎄4👏3🤡1

15 Jan 2026, 11:52 UTC≈1,930 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Заодно и нелояльных просеяли. Вообще, есть желание сделать этот канал местом, куда буду писать всякое непрофильное, которое никуда не вмещается, а сказать хочется. Но не факт.

😁14🌭2🍌2👀2👍1🤡1

15 Jan 2026, 11:22 UTC≈2,550 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я, кстати, ну прям серьезно дохуя много работал и продолжаю работать в Telegram. Но абсолютно лояльную, пусть и небольшую аудиторию, удалось собрать только тут. С прошедшими вас, друзья!

🎉1310👍2🍾1🎄1💊1🔥1

22 Oct 2024, 15:41 UTC≈19,400 views105 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Звездочка про иноагентов, а мы про любовь! А текст про то, что в мессенджере МАХ нас не будет никогда. Подписывайтесь на БЧН!

🔥68🤝19👍9🤡7👀1💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @thisisstarlite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 397,925 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Та самая звездочка” (@thisisstarlite), 121 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thisisstarlite.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.