Channel
@thisisnklv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
217subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002601405361 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thisisnklv |
| Description | Пишу как вижу. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thisisnklv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 217 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 217 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (1 July 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 521 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
82 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 64.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 13.4% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В России второй день фиксируются технические сбои в работе корейского KakaoTalk и турецкого BiP. Пользователи сообщают о задержках при отправке сообщений, а корейский сервис не функционирует еще с понедельника. Что примечательно, при включении VPN оба приложения моментально восстанавливают полную работоспособность. Официальных заявлений о блокировках от Роскомнадзора не поступало, хотя аудитория этих площадок в стр…
❤3
Обвинение Павла Дурова в содействии терроризму выглядит сигналом о новом витке борьбы за контроль над интернетом. Поводом стали претензии к ботам вроде «Дайвинчика», хотя аналогичные сервисы спокойно работают во «ВКонтакте» и других мессенджерах. Избирательность претензий здесь видна невооруженным глазом. Угроза пожизненного срока и возможной блокировки платформы бьет по привычному укладу жизни миллиона пользовател…
❤5
СУРГУТ, ВСЕХ ПРИГЛАШАЮ!
❤8👍1
🐘 Приглашаем вас стать гостем регионального съезда партии «Новые люди» — событие, где будут представлены команда, кандидаты и ключевые проекты, определяющие развитие региона на ближайшие годы. Региональный съезд «Новых людей» — это площадка, где формируется повестка и принимаются решения, влияющие на жизнь в ХМАО. На этой встрече мы представим кандидатов в депутаты и презентуем проекты, которые уже работают. ❗️ Это…
❤4
16 июля открываем первый штаб молодежного движения «Новые» — и приглашаем вас стать частью этого события! Если давно хотелось найти команду единомышленников, попробовать себя в волонтерстве, реализовать собственные идеи или просто познакомиться с интересными людьми — приходите. Вас ждут интерактивные зоны, подкаст-студия, выставка проектов, лекции от экспертов, стратегическая игра и возможность узнать, как присоеди…
❤7
Борис Надеждин, в пятницу признанный иноагентом, задержан
😨3❤2
Наши кандидаты по одномандатным округам Москвы 📋 Съезд позади. Мы выдвинули 24 кандидата. В этом посте знакомим вас с теми из них, кто идёт по одномандатным округам: Юрий Омельченко — округ 195 (Бабушкинский) Андрей Лупий — округ 196 (Кунцевский) Анастасия Павлюченкова — округ 197 (Ленинградский) Константин Минеев — округ 198 (Люблинский) Игорь Ласкеев — округ 199 (Медведковский) Иван Ситников — округ 200 (Нагатинс…
❤2
Решение Яндекса объединять память почты и диска крайне нелогичное, с учетом того что и Диск на компьютерах стал платный.
🤯5❤3
🤓
❤5💋1
Когда на троих двоих решили сообразить… Уже в эту субботу проводим «Встречу трёх комитетов» в МНЛ, будем в формате деловой/ролевой игры постигать азы политики, короче должно быть интересно. 😁 А вот подготавливаем мы так, с Вовчиком, в народном Кинге, думайте
❤5
Мы во второй раз идём на выборы в Госдуму! Сегодня побывали на съезде партии и зарядились энергией на предстоящую гонку. От Москвы выдвинули 16 кандидатов. В первую тройку федерального списка вошли Алексей Нечаев, Владислав Даванков и Сардана Авксентьева. На выборы идём с программным манифестом «12 шагов к России, в которой хочется жить». Если вы разделяете наши ценности — присоединяйтесь к «Новым людям». Новые …
❤2💋2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥11❤7🔥4💘1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @thisisnklv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НКЛВ.” (@thisisnklv), 217 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thisisnklv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.