Channel
@thinking_history
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001901380814 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thinking_history |
| Description | Увлекательные истории не вошедшие в учебники , реконструкции нейросети, правда и вымысел в компьютерных играх, атмосфера исторических мест - все это на канале "Думающая история". Думайте вместе с нами! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thinking_history |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 136 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 136 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
96 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 44.8% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 24 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, в связи с нестабильной работой Telegram мы приняли решение о публикации материалов на нашей основной площадке - Дзене. Телеграм канал мы продолжим вести в свободном формате, без тематических недель
❤4💘1
Как вам наш текущий формат — тематические недели (когда все посты недели посвящены одной теме)? Стоит ли его сохранить или лучше изменить?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Друзья, всем доброго дня! Мы обработали результаты голосования и поняли, что большая часть из вас не читает посты из-за того, что просто попалась неинтересная тема. В этой связи еще один вопрос😇
❤2
Вопрос 2. Чего бы вам хотелось добавить в канал?
The shares total 222%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2
Вопрос 1. Если вы иногда не дочитываете посты или пролистываете, то в чем главная причина ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Друзья, привет! 👋 Мы решили переосмыслить некоторые элементы нашего канала и нам нужна ваша помощь. Чтобы нам стать лучше и интереснее для вас, ответьте, пожалуйста, на несколько вопросов.
❤2
Верите ли вы, что Папа римский Пий II был автором эротического романа?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥3
Думаете, в Средние века все ходили мрачные, читали молитвенники и боялись лишний раз посмотреть в сторону противоположного пола? Как бы не так. Художники тех лет развлекались как могли, и главным их оружием были... фрукты и овощи. Потому что нарисовать откровенную сцену – это слишком прямо. А вот вложить весь неприличный смысл в арбуз или грушу – это искусство. https://dzen.ru/a/aZrBAg71aTLtrnmS?share_to=link
❤4👍2
Выяснить, как именно проявляли нежность наши предки – задачка ещё та. И все же лингвистам и археологам удалось собирать пазл https://dzen.ru/a/aZggX_fiKiKz353p?share_to=link
❤5
https://dzen.ru/a/aZQXvaVPzF1CLT0P?share_to=telegram Средневековый пояс верности: железная логика или железный миф?
🔥8
На этой неделе отправляемся в путешествие по самым сокровенным уголкам прошлого. Будем подглядывать за древними, удивляться их страхам, смеяться над их изобретениями и учиться читать намёки, которые художники прятали в деталях. То, о чём не принято было говорить вслух, но принято рисовать, записывать в трактатах и передавать из уст в уста. С научной точностью, здоровой иронией и полным отсутствием ханжества. Присо…
❤6
Где найдено самое древнее золотое изделие?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thinking_history. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вам наш текущий формат — тематические недели (когда все посты недели посвящены одной теме)? Стоит ли его сохранить или лучше изменить?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вопрос 2. Чего бы вам хотелось добавить в канал?
The shares total 222%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вопрос 1. Если вы иногда не дочитываете посты или пролистываете, то в чем главная причина ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Верите ли вы, что Папа римский Пий II был автором эротического романа?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Где найдено самое древнее золотое изделие?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто придумал пуговицы на воротнике мужской рубашки?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 24 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 942,906 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Думающая история” (@thinking_history), 136 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thinking_history.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.