This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 794–801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 17:53
795
-4
6 Aug 2026, 15:31
799
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:40
799
-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:53
800
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
16
42.1%
👍
12
31.6%
❤
9
23.7%
👌
1
2.63%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2024 to 18 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Rock-a-Round test is live!
We’re almost ready to launch — and today we’re sharing a sneak peek of the gameplay.
🎮This is just a test version, but the core mechanics are already working — and it’s fun as hell.
📱Simple, addictive, mobile-first. Just how we like it.
✨Play2Joy is coming to Tonbanking very soon.
Stay tuned — and enjoy the first look!
🎮Rock-a-Round Game Update! 🎮
We’ve recorded the first test run of the game’s draft version — and while we’re still far from the final release, the core mechanics are already taking shape. And guess what? It’s looking super exciting! 🔥
Stay with us — big things are coming! 🚀✨
TONBanking Tech Preview
We’re excited to share a real video from our internal testing phase — showing how the core TONBanking flow works using a non-custodial wallet 🔐 and virtual cards 💳.
This is not a mockup, but a real transaction flow running on our backend.
(At the very end of the video, we cut a few seconds to protect our tester’s personal data.)
Here’s what you’ll see in the video:
1️⃣ User opens the TONBa…
🎉Big News from TonBanking! 🎉
Hey there, dear subscribers! 🚀
We’ve officially started building out the functionality inside our web app and, at the same time, we’re introducing a new business model.
🔹Access to TonBanking services will now cost 500 stars per month.
For this, users will get:
🔠Full access to the TonBanking web app with all services
🔠Exclusive bonuses from XT Exchange
🔠Entry to the TonBanking Private C…
🎉Hooray! The Final Test Lottery Has Begun!🎉
🔥$100 prize pool – 4 winners!
🏆💰
⏳Ends in 48 hours!
Go, go, go! 🚀Farm points for free and win real cash prizes! 🎟️💸
Good luck! 🍀
🚀 Member of Rock Alliance
AIdeaForge: Your Guide to Revolutionary NFTs on Startonus!
Welcome to @AIdeaForge, the ultimate platform that uses artificial intelligence to help entrepreneurs and startups bring their ideas to life with minimal effort! Whether you're a creator, innovator, or enthusiast, this is your chance to join a groundbreaking project.
✔️ [Explore AIdeaForge NFTs]
💬 [@AIdeaForgechat]
🔗 Why Join AId…
🎅🎉Happy New Year from Tonbanking! 🎉🎅
Dear friends, as we step into 2025, we want to sincerely thank everyone who believes in us and supports the development of our project. 💙🙌
✨This year, we’ve achieved so much:
• Created two lead magnets—one has already been published, and the second will be released right after the New Year. 🎯📢
• Launched plans, announcements, integrations, and partnerships that we’ll continue …
News for The Rock Alliance
🔥 SimpleNFT — simplify monetization of Telegram mini-apps via NFT:
⚡️ Create Custom NFT Collections in 15 Seconds and 3 Steps
💰 Monetize apps without blockchain knowledge and huge costs
🌎 Share your collection via a unique link or embed it in your app to start earning today
🏆 Why SimpleNFT?
— Minimal commissions: 3% on every NFT created
— Flexible settings: specify mint value and limits…
Напоминаем про старт серии закрытых вечеринок TRENDSETTERS!
🗓️ Когда: 21 декабря, 19:00
📍 Где: VOLO, Новый Арбат, д. 5
TRENDSETTERS - это уникальная закрытая нетворкинг-вечеринка на 300 человек.
ДЛЯ КОГО?
Предприниматели;
Топ-менеджеры;
Инвесторы и проекты;
Лидеры мнений;
Спикеры и партнеры THE TRENDS.
ЧТО В МЕНЮ?
➡️ Яркая вечерняя программа;
➡️ Неформальное общение с топами рынка;
➡️ FREE бар и закуски;
➡️ Уника…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @therock_alliance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
If we launch an exclusive Tonbanking private club with insider analytics, early access to key events, and a private chat with experts—would you join?
Yes, if the price is reasonable29%
Depends on the content, need more details26%
No, free content is enough for me45%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2024 to 18 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 730,043 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@therock_alliance named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rock_a_round named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Rock Alliance Tonb” (@therock_alliance), 795 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/therock_alliance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.