Channel
@VorpalDefender
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,610subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002224278448 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VorpalDefender |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VorpalDefender |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 2,610 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 2,629 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 2,632 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2025 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1️⃣ Now every user has(v.0.16+): 🔤 a level and experience 🔤 quests of varying rarity 🔤 leaderboards by level and stars 2️⃣ If you minted NFTs from official or partner collections, your experience has already been credited. 3️⃣ Visit and check your level now: @simplenftbot P.S. And yes — thank you for your patience. We didn’t manage to ship the update exactly on schedule due to a few unexpected challenges.…
🚨 SimpleNFT x Hashwall: Revolutionizing TON Identity We're excited to announce our partnership with Hashwall — the first protocol enabling secure, customizable vanity addresses on TON. What are vanity addresses? Imagine having a TON wallet that ends with UQB..._DEGEN or ..._SIMPLE instead of random characters. That’s what Hashwall makes possible — turning your wallet into a unique, memorable identity. 🦄 Why it mat…
👍2❤1
⭐ Preparations for the global update of SimpleNFT are in full swing! We have released a technical update that optimizes the SimpleNFT infrastructure: — Now all NFT metadata created in our service is duplicated on local SimpleNFT servers to provide more reliability and fault tolerance. — Now all data in the service is loaded from SimpleNFT servers to reduce the load on the API of the main IPFS servers. At the mome…
👍 Congratulations to all owners of legendary skins! 🍸 Now you are part of the elite class in SimpleNFT! There are 25 avatars and 24 banners in total — according to market laws, the lower the supply, the higher the price! The dynamic whitelist test went according to plan. The SimpleNFT team is proud of the result. You can sell your legendary NFTs on the secondary market... But would you want to? 👨💻 The SimpleNFT…
👍2
🚨 Mint Legendary skin pack "MNFTGA: Believer" is open to all! Yes, you read that right: if you've been requesting a mint but don't meet the criteria, you can now mint the legendary avatar and banner! This is a last resort for those who didn't make it in all this time. Whoever made it in time wins, we warned you. There is 35 minutes left, take action!
⏱Did you make it in time? Today, at 23:59 (UTC+3), the minting of the legendary skin pack "MNFTGA: Believer," available on a dynamic whitelist, as well as the minting of the epic skin pack "Lost in Space," will end. You will not have another opportunity to obtain NFT skins. 🗣️ Mint now, or FOMO tomorrow. 🗿 Become a Legend: Submit your mint request (in 2 hours, the SimpleNFT team will approve all mint requests an…
⭐️ Get your Legendary skin pack. There will be no other chance. We remind you that until September 15, you can apply for a mint of Legendary skin pack Make NFT Great Again "Believer" (avatar and banner) for your profile in SimpleNFT. These are the rarest and most valuable skins there can be. The owners of such a skin pack get a bonus in getting experience, as well as a chance to win in any contests running on the …
In the new version (0.15.9), we fixed most of the interface bugs and slightly reworked the referral system: 1. Connect valet no longer overlaps the connect TON window 2. Referral data and profile statistics are displayed correctly 3. We changed the referral system calculation, now it is focused on collection fees. If you invite someone who creates a collection, then you will receive 5 percent of our commissions from …
⚠️ ATTENTION! !The new update(0.15.0) after assembly works normally for some time, but then "eats" logs and starts to slow down. Because of this, there may be problems with loading/mints and everything in general. We know the problem, the solution is being prepared, we will roll out a hot fix in the evening (20:00 GMT+3)
🥇 Meet the greatest skinpack in the entire history of SimpleNFT — the legendary MAKE NFT GREAT AGAIN! This is one of the rarest and most valuable skins in SimpleNFT. There will never be anything like it again. As we explained in the previous post, skins give a boost to EXP gain and raffle winning chances. The legendary avatar skin and background skin have the following stats (they stack): ✨ +25% EXP gain 🍀 +5% cha…
✍️ Dynamic Whitelists — the rules of the NFT game are changing We’re announcing a major update that takes NFT technology to a whole new level. The SimpleNFT team introduces Dynamic Whitelists — technologically enhanced whitelists where on-chain data can change in real time. 💱 What does this mean? How does it change NFTs? Imagine a store = the NFT collection creator. The goods = NFTs & SBTs. 🔴 Regular whitelist: …
🚨 Have the rules of the game changed? Something incredible is coming. Something we've been building for so long. Something that will be the first brick in the foundation of a new world where the NFT are great again. ⭐️ Tomorrow. Share this post with your friends. Tell everyone about it. What do you think — what's in store for us?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VorpalDefender. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,085,592 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Star Defender” (@VorpalDefender), 2,610 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VorpalDefender.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.