Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Soul Therapy Lisichnyi

@therapydusha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

751subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001774545047
TypeChannel
Username@therapydusha
DescriptionМагистр психологии. Клинический психолог. Прошёл длительное теоретическое и практическое обучение психоаналитической индивидуальной, семейной и групповой психотерапии.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/therapydusha

Growth

75110 Aug 2026, 08:47 — 751 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:00 — 751 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:4710 Aug 2026, 09:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 750–752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:00751no change
10 Aug 2026, 08:47751first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.8%
avg views ÷ 751 subscribers
Avg views / post
246
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (10 February 202631 July 2026)
Views total738
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
24
Videos
1
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

276 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8129.3%
👍6222.5%
🕊3111.2%
3010.9%
💯165.80%
🤔134.71%
👏113.99%
❤‍🔥82.90%
🤯62.17%
😢51.81%
🙏51.81%
💔31.09%
😍31.09%
🎉10.362%
🥰10.362%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC230 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026

«Прощение означает отказ от всякой надежды на лучшее прошлое»

👍11🔥6🕊21🤔1

29 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC262 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

А здесь - размышления (не мои) по поводу этих дебатов: https://dzen.ru/a/amnTq2MDi0dGWPsd

1

28 Jun 2026, 13:57 UTC404 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @psychosomatique_channelPhoto

Много лет назад Фрейд писал о "диком психоанализе". Встречаемся мы с вами с этим самым «диким» психоанализом? Повсеместно. Ну, например, когда хотим проанализировать кого-нибудь: друга, коллегу, случайного прохожего. Можем проанализировать как "психоаналитик" или выдать диагноз, как "психолог", сходу, по одной фразе готов ярлык: нарцисс, абьюзер и т.п.. Например, «ты обо мне переживал, значит, хотел на самом деле,

💯10🕊31

21 Jun 2026, 03:46 UTC498 views46 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥29👍7❤‍🔥4👏2😍2🙏2

21 Jun 2026, 03:46 UTC470 views48 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Еще один этап моего образования пройден

🔥25👍10👏5❤‍🔥3🙏3🎉1😍1

5 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC654 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @myxomatosis_of_amygdala

Хорошего психотерапевта сложно найти, дорого оплачивать и неприятно разочаровывать. А чат-боту можно написать в любой момент, даже если ты лежишь в кровати, ненавидишь себя и хочешь, чтобы кто-нибудь срочно объяснил, что ты не разваливаешься. Собственно, поэтому люди и начали использовать ИИ как психическую аптечку на тумбочке. Исследователи из Drexel проанализировали миллионы постов из mental health-сабреддитов и н

💯2🔥2🤔2

5 Jun 2026, 15:09 UTC516 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ceinpsychoanalysisPhoto

Вышла новая книга Марка Солмса «Единственное исцеление», исследующая эффективность «старого доброго психоанализа» и соединения с современной нейронаукой. Mark Solms — The Only Cure: Freud and the Neuroscience of Mental Healing: Марк – нейробиолог, специалист по нейропсихологии сновидений, автор нескольких книг о связи мозга и сознания, практикующий психоаналитик и редактор 24-томного пересмотренного стандартного из

🕊21👍1

31 May 2026, 13:59 UTC426 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

«Разрыв, — пишет он, — будет больше, чем когда-либо между промышленными империями и аграрными племенами. Больше, чем между Homo sapiens и неандертальцами». Высший вид будет относиться к низшему примерно так, как мы сегодня относимся к животным. *** О том, что свобода воли — иллюзия. Едва ли не самый еретический тезис Харари: либеральная вера в свободу личности, на которой стоит вся западная цивилизация, не имеет науч

🤔82🕊2🤯2👍1

31 May 2026, 13:59 UTC439 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Несколько по-настоящему сенсационных тезисов Юваля Ноя Харари о нашем недалёком будущем Юваль Ной Харари, израильский историк (а не футуролог, как его часто называют) и автор книг, разошедшихся более чем в 45 миллионах экземпляров, — пожалуй, один из самых обсуждаемых и провоцирующих мыслителей нашего времени. Его «Sapiens», «Homo Deus», «21 урок для XXI века» и недавнюю «Nexus» одни считают пророчествами, другие —

7🕊2🤔2👍1

3 May 2026, 18:53 UTC575 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @childpsychoanalysis_efpp

Если специалист называет свою работу психоаналитической или психодинамической, но при этом годами работает без супервизии, возникает вполне закономерный вопрос: насколько всерьёз он сам относится к идее бессознательного. Психоаналитический подход по определению исходит из того, что поведение человека определяется не только тем, что он осознаёт. Мы работаем с переносом, контрпереносом, бессознательными фантазиями, за

🔥5👍4👏42🕊2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @therapydusha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,088,011 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Soul Therapy Lisichnyi” (@therapydusha), 751 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/therapydusha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.