Channel
@themuroqaba
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004391605296 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @themuroqaba |
| Description | Siyosiy, falsafiy va iqtisodiy mushohadalar. Qutbiddin Obid |
| Created | 16 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/themuroqaba |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 21 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 21 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
30 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 56.7% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 23.3% | |
| 🎄 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Özbekça yozuvga yangi çiroy qöşilmoqda ekan 🇺🇿 Alifbomizda kichkina, lekin qiziq özgarişlar bor: G‘ → Ğ O‘ → Ö Sh → Ş Ch → Ç Endi so‘zlar ham boshqacha kayfiyat beradi: Özbekça Ğurur Şijoat Çiroyli fikr Köngil Endi bu yangi harflarga ham asta-sekin moslaşişimiz kerak böladi. Manba: gazeta.uz @themuroqaba
🔥2⚡1👍1
#ona_tili #asliyat Til masalasi ko‘tarilgan bir paytda aytishni joiz deb bildim. Ba’zi bir deyarli hamma ishchilari o’zbek bo’lgan ishxonalar borki, ishlari o‘zbek tilida yuritish bilan cheklangan bo‘lsa-da yoki rus tiliga hech ehtiyoj tug‘ilmay, o‘zbek va ingliz tillarida yuritilsa-da, bir necha kishilar o‘zbek bolasi bo‘la turib, o‘zlari o‘rischa so‘zlashadi. Bilmadim, bu bilan nimaga erishadi-yu, qanday foyda ko…
🔥4❤2
#baxt #forobiy #falsafa Qachon baxtli bo'lamiz? Forobiyga ko‘ra, odamlar baxtni turlicha tasavvur qiladilar. Kimdir boylikni, kimdir huzur-halovatni, boshqasi hokimiyatni, yana kimdir ilm va ma'rifatni baxt deb biladi. Har kim o‘zi baxt deb ishongan narsani eng qadrli va eng oliy maqsad deb hisoblaydi. Biroq chinakam baxtning eng muhim belgisi shundaki, unga erishgan inson bundan ham oliyroq maqsadni izlashdan to‘…
❤2
#tafakkur #forobiy Forobiyning fikrlari insonni tafakkur qilishga chorlaydi: Oqil kishi o'z hayotini tahlil qilib, o'zidan shuni so'rashi kerak: vositalar bilan ovora bo'lib, asl maqsad — baxtni — unutmadimmi? Chunki vositalar asl maqsad o'rnini egallasa va u unutilsa, bunday hayot muvaffaqiyatli hayot emas, balki yashash uchun arzimas hayot bo'lib qoladi. @themuroqaba
❤3🔥1
#falsafa #forobiy #baxt Eng oliy yaxshilikni tanish Ba'zi narsalar bor — ularni faqat boshqa bir maqsadga erishish uchun istaymiz. Ular vosita, xolos. Yana shunday narsalar ham borki, ularni o'zidan boshqa sabab uchun emas, aynan o'zi uchun qadrlaymiz. Ana shunday maqsadlar vosita sifatida qadrlanadigan barcha narsalardan ustundir. Buni oddiy misol bilan tushunish mumkin. Bir kishi daryoning bu qirg'og'idan narigi…
❤3
#Baxt #Forobiy #falsafa 1-yo'llanma Maqsadlar va yaxshiliklar ichida eng yaxshisi nima? Kamolot va maqsad aslida inson yaxshilik deb bilgan narsalar bo’lgani uchun, har bir inson ularga ishtiyoq bilan intiladi. Kimdir ilmni, kimdir boylikni, kimdir mansabni, yana kimdir obro’ yoki sog’liqni kamolot deb biladi va ularga erishish uchun bor kuchini sarflaydi. Ammo hayot davomida erishishni istaydigan maqsadlarimiz s…
❤2
#falsafa #aristotel #inson Qadimgi yunon faylasuflaridan Aristotel, Platonning shogirdi sifatida, davlatning asosiy maqsadi insonlarni fazilatli hayot sari yetaklashdan iborat bo‘lishi kerakligini ta’kidlaydi. Uning fikricha, xalq xavfsizligi, tinchligi va barqarorligi insonlarning yashashi hamda o‘z oldilariga maqsad qo‘yishlari uchun zarur vositadir. Biroq davlatning oliy maqsadi bundan ham yuksakroq bo‘lib, fuqar…
❤2👍1
#Plato #Ezgu_hayot #ahloq Platonning ushbu qarashi bugungi siyosiy tizimlar haqida muhim savolni o‘rtaga tashlaydi. Davlatning vazifasi faqat xavfsizlik va barqarorlikni ta’minlashdan iboratmi yoki fuqarolarni axloqiy kamolot sari yo‘naltirish ham uning zimmasidami? Zamonaviy liberal-demokratik davlatlar, odatda, insonlarning shaxsiy hayotiga va axloqiy tanlovlariga keng erkinlik berishni ma’qul ko‘radilar. Ularnin…
❤3
#plato #falsafa Ko‘pchilik jamiyatlar va siyosiy tizimlar davlatning asosiy vazifasi sifatida fuqarolar xavfsizligi, yurt tinchligi va barqarorligini ta’minlashni ko‘radilar. Platon esa bu qarashni yetarli deb hisoblamaydi. Uning fikricha, davlatning eng oliy maqsadi fuqarolarni ezgu hayot sari yo‘naltirishdir. Biroq ezgu hayotning mohiyatini anglash har kimning ham qo‘lidan kelmaydi. Bu aqliy salohiyat, axloqiy ka…
🎄3
#falsafa #klassik_davr #demokratiya #suqrot Yunonistonning klassik davri miloddan avvalgi VI asr oxiri va V asr boshlarida shakllana boshladi. Bu davr ko‘plab buyuk mutafakkirlarni yetishtirib, adabiyot, me’morchilik, ilm-fan va, ayniqsa, falsafaning yuksalishiga guvoh bo‘ldi. Yunon sivilizatsiyasi keyinchalik G‘arb sivilizatsiyasining shakllanishi va taraqqiyotiga beqiyos ta’sir ko‘rsatdi. Afinada xalq zolim hukmd…
Ushbu sahifada mutolaa va ta’lim davomida hosil bo‘lgan mushohadalarimni qayd etib borurman. Maqsad — o‘rganganlarimni yozish orqali mustahkamlash va ahl-i fikr bilan birgalikda muhokama etmoqdir. Agar so‘zlarimizda xato va nuqsonlar topilsa, kaminaning ilm da’vosida emas, ilm talabida ekanini nazarda tutib, nasihat va tuzatishlaringizni ayamasligingizni so‘rayman. Meni ustozlarga havas qilgan bir shogird deb bilib…
Bismillahir Rohmanir Rohiym. Alloh o’zing barakali va manfaatli qilgin. Assalomu alaykum va rohmatullohi va barokatuh.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @themuroqaba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@themuroqaba named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muroqaba” (@themuroqaba), 21 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themuroqaba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.