Channel
@briefinguz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
71subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003333463745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @briefinguz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/briefinguz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 71 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 73 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 77 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 78 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 78 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
39 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 16 | 41.0% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Özbekça yozuvga yangi çiroy qöşilmoqda ekan 🇺🇿 Alifbomizda kichkina, lekin qiziq özgarişlar bor: G‘ → Ğ O‘ → Ö Sh → Ş Ch → Ç Endi so‘zlar ham boshqacha kayfiyat beradi: Özbekça Ğurur Şijoat Çiroyli fikr Köngil Endi bu yangi harflarga ham asta-sekin moslaşişimiz kerak böladi. Manba: gazeta.uz @themuroqaba
👍3😁2👎1🤔1
Donolarning donosi ))
🤣1
Botir aka Qobilovning Shomurodov ruscha postiga bildirgan tanqidiy fikriga bir "Devushkaxon" javob yozibdi. Ruscha va inglizcha o‘rganing deb maslahat berayotgan ekan. Yana ilm ham olsin ekan. Botir aka esa yillardan beri Amerikada yashab, Garvardda doktorlikni tugatib, AQSh universitetida professor bo‘lib ishlamoqda. Ha, bilmaydi-da... @briefinguz
😁5🤣3🔥1
#ona_tili #asliyat Til masalasi ko‘tarilgan bir paytda aytishni joiz deb bildim. Ba’zi bir deyarli hamma ishchilari o’zbek bo’lgan ishxonalar borki, ishlari o‘zbek tilida yuritish bilan cheklangan bo‘lsa-da yoki rus tiliga hech ehtiyoj tug‘ilmay, o‘zbek va ingliz tillarida yuritilsa-da, bir necha kishilar o‘zbek bolasi bo‘la turib, o‘zlari o‘rischa so‘zlashadi. Bilmadim, bu bilan nimaga erishadi-yu, qanday foyda ko…
❤2🔥1
#baxt #forobiy #falsafa Qachon baxtli bo'lamiz? Forobiyga ko‘ra, odamlar baxtni turlicha tasavvur qiladilar. Kimdir boylikni, kimdir huzur-halovatni, boshqasi hokimiyatni, yana kimdir ilm va ma'rifatni baxt deb biladi. Har kim o‘zi baxt deb ishongan narsani eng qadrli va eng oliy maqsad deb hisoblaydi. Biroq chinakam baxtning eng muhim belgisi shundaki, unga erishgan inson bundan ham oliyroq maqsadni izlashdan to‘…
❤1
❗️Элдор Шомуродовнинг голи турнирнинг энг яхши голи бўлиши мумкин — бу бизга боғлиқ! ФИФА расмий сайтида “Турнирнинг энг яхши голи” учун овоз бериш жараёни бошланди. Ҳозирда биринчи босқич – гуруҳ ўйинларида урилган 215 та гол орасидан энг чиройли 12 таси танлаб олинди. Ушбу рўйхатда Ўзбекистон терма жамоаси сардори Элдор Шомуродовнинг Конго ДР дарвозасига йўллаган “парашют” зарбаси ҳам бор. Овоз бериш жараёни жуд…
🔥1
#tafakkur #forobiy Forobiyning fikrlari insonni tafakkur qilishga chorlaydi: Oqil kishi o'z hayotini tahlil qilib, o'zidan shuni so'rashi kerak: vositalar bilan ovora bo'lib, asl maqsad — baxtni — unutmadimmi? Chunki vositalar asl maqsad o'rnini egallasa va u unutilsa, bunday hayot muvaffaqiyatli hayot emas, balki yashash uchun arzimas hayot bo'lib qoladi. @themuroqaba
#falsafa #forobiy #baxt Eng oliy yaxshilikni tanish Ba'zi narsalar bor — ularni faqat boshqa bir maqsadga erishish uchun istaymiz. Ular vosita, xolos. Yana shunday narsalar ham borki, ularni o'zidan boshqa sabab uchun emas, aynan o'zi uchun qadrlaymiz. Ana shunday maqsadlar vosita sifatida qadrlanadigan barcha narsalardan ustundir. Buni oddiy misol bilan tushunish mumkin. Bir kishi daryoning bu qirg'og'idan narigi…
#Baxt #Forobiy #falsafa Maqsadlar va yaxshiliklar ichida eng yaxshisi nima? Kamolot va maqsad aslida inson yaxshilik deb bilgan narsalar bo’lgani uchun, har bir inson ularga ishtiyoq bilan intiladi. Kimdir ilmni, kimdir boylikni, kimdir mansabni, yana kimdir obro’ yoki sog’liqni kamolot deb biladi va ularga erishish uchun bor kuchini sarflaydi. Ammo hayot davomida erishishni istaydigan maqsadlarimiz son-sanoqsiz v…
O’chsa yaxshidi
🤔2🔥1
Qurbon hayitida falastinliklar qoni to'kildi Qurbon hayitida haj safaridagi musulmonlar shaytonga tosh otgan chog'da, shaytonga ergashgan Isroil harbiylari falastinliklarga o'q va raketalar otdi. Bu kechagi tunda sodir bo’larkan, unda o'ta zich joylashgan tinch fuqarolar yashaydigan binolar vayron qilindi. Bu esa mahalliy musulmonlarga psixologik zulm va bosimni kuchaytirmoqda. "Middle East Eye" habar berishicha, I…
❤1💔1
Qurbon hayiti barchangizga muborak bo‘lsin, aziz do‘stlar! Briefing.uz
❤2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @briefinguz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@briefinguz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Briefing.uz” (@briefinguz), 71 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/briefinguz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.