Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОтсосискА

Channel

ОтсосискА

@otsosiska

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

24,172subscribers

-383 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001334218632
TypeChannel
Username@otsosiska
Description+18 https://knd.gov.ru/license? id=6762ade8506f9677283431e0&registryType=bloggersPermission Экспертошная по мемасикам мемный канал в телеграм, канал с мемами в телеге Канал сотрудничает с рекламным сервисом https://t.me/Tgpodbor_official
Created25 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/otsosiska

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

24,02824,55524,291.524,1726 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -383. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,949–24,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 02:0124,172+144
8 Nov 2026, 16:4624,028-7
7 Nov 2026, 10:5924,035-1
6 Nov 2026, 12:1824,036-1
5 Nov 2026, 15:3524,037-10
4 Nov 2026, 16:4924,047+3
3 Nov 2026, 18:2024,044-6
2 Nov 2026, 19:1824,050-7
1 Nov 2026, 18:2724,057-4
31 Oct 2026, 17:0524,061-11
30 Oct 2026, 14:4624,072-9
29 Oct 2026, 15:0724,081-11
28 Oct 2026, 13:2924,092-8
27 Oct 2026, 14:0624,100-11
26 Oct 2026, 12:1824,111-7
25 Oct 2026, 15:0624,118-6
24 Oct 2026, 17:3124,124-5
22 Oct 2026, 21:2824,129-7
21 Oct 2026, 18:5124,136-10
20 Oct 2026, 17:0024,146first reading

Engagement

2,143 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.81%
avg views ÷ 24,172 subscribers
Avg views / post
920
724 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
724
of 2,143 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 724 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held2,143 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total666,097
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 05:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈146,000
Videos
≈12,500
Links
≈1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
24m 17s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @otsosiska. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 October 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 724 posts held from the last 30 days (0.552%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,143 posts we hold for @otsosiska. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTCAnonymous Poll76 voters

Как у вас с памятью?

  1. Хорошо16%
  2. Ну так, около нормы, чото забываю55%
  3. Херово37%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTCAnonymous Poll72 voters

Курица или рыба?

  1. Курица60%
  2. Рыба43%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTCAnonymous Poll108 voters

Хотели бы вы трахнуть клоуна/клоунессу во всей 🤡 атрибутике?

  1. Да31%
  2. Нет70%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 16:07 UTCAnonymous Poll88 voters

У кого чувственнее губы?

  1. Дарья57%
  2. Анжелика44%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Oct 2026, 09:31 UTCAnonymous Poll255 voters

Стоит ли половину театров Москвы отдать под массажные салоны?

  1. Да, конечно62%
  2. Нет40%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Oct 2026, 19:27 UTCAnonymous Poll328 voters

Кто из детских героев вам нравится больше?

  1. Карлсон27%
  2. Незнайка23%
  3. Том Сойер и Гек Финн30%
  4. Гарри Поттер17%
  5. Я вас услышал17%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 October 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Нечеловеческий потанцевал
@batollo_void · 11,644
15 posts
Вымершие меманты
@memantbl · 1
10 posts
Крысячий ежедневник 🐿
@guacamoola · 71
6 posts
I’m not a cat
@imnotacatbitch · 6
3 posts
Bloom's Day
@joyceday · 59
3 posts
Stierlitz⚡️Z
@stierlitz_stierlitz · 37
3 posts
АЛКОМЕМЫ by TATAZHBAN🤡
@alkomemsbytatazhban · 80
2 posts
ГОРИТ И ПАХНЕТ
@andflame · 8,936
2 posts
экзистенциальное кафе «духота»
@journikkitalk · 16
2 posts
Мастерская копирайтера
@knowrussian · 26
2 posts
Ссылочка в описании! 🕺
@ssilkavopisani · 3
2 posts
зВеРъСтВО~
@CatOmOre · 10
1 post
Луис Иванович
@LIVfashionmag · 198,319
1 post
РУСНЯшка
@RUSNYAshka · 3
1 post
ПРАВИЛА ТОКСИЧНОСТИ
@TOXIC_DELUX · 287
1 post
Вандербильдиха
@Vanderbildiha · 3
1 post
оскар за лучшую женскую боль
@alcobarbie · 8,728
1 post
AterCattus was here
@atercattus_was_here · 153
1 post
Daily Comics
@dcomics · 75
1 post
Куклы - зайцы
@dollsandbunnies · 560
1 post
Опять этот Слепцов
@etotsleptsov · 245
1 post
Ведущий на свадьбу | корпоратив Антон Кудлай
@ilovemywedding · 52
1 post
Красное & Твёрдое
@krasnoe_i_tverdoe · 27
1 post
Мурманск Аутсайд
@muroutside · 1
1 post
Параноев ковчег
@paranoevkovcheg · 8,508
1 post
Пиздабол
@peacederby · 19
1 post
Яйца КОНЯ
@repostnotstole · 18
1 post
Сияние мемного разума
@siyaniememov · 31
1 post
СМОТРЯЩИЙ СПРАШИВАЕТ
@smopr · 1,649
1 post
Джейн он Эйр
@thejaneonair · 6,195
1 post
Уставший бобёp 🦫
@tiredbeaver · 17
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОтсосискА” (@otsosiska), 24,172 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otsosiska.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.