Channel
@thegardenoffreedom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
264subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001562345119 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thegardenoffreedom |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thegardenoffreedom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 264 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 265 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 266 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 267 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 266 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 266 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
39 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 21 | 53.8% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 20.5% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 20.5% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Not as good as shot as Johnny but at least the police didn’t murder a hero in this case. https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/04/watch-hero-bystander-who-fired-on-in-n-out-gunman-recalls-when-rounds-started-coming-at-him-everything-changed/
Last night, Apple briefly removed Telegram from the App Store because a single user had planted illegal pornographic content in a public group chat. ⬅️ Telegram was restored within hours. But I want to explain what happened — to warn other app developers and help protect online communities from similar attacks. 🧹Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using all kinds of moderation tools,…
🔥1
Fantastic claims require fantastic evidence. A man landing on the moon is a fantastic claim. There is no admissible evidence to corroborate this claim, let alone fantastic evidence. The "evidence" lunar-landing believers do cite is fantastically inadmissible. Why are people so afraid of admitting it was a fraud? The reason is that they fear the collapse of their entire belief system. Once one has the intellectua…
🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Our favorite inner peace police gives a reframe on pain.
🔥2
I don't know about flying cars, but we definitely should have solved war, hunger, access to modern medicine, and desperation poverty by now. Fuck you, governments of the world. And if I'm being honest, fuck nearly every billionaire too.
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
Hey, Elon. Space is cool and all, and I'll join you, but ... can you help us do something about war or other massive evil government waste first? When it comes to government efficiency, you barely made a dent. Let's turn the war machine into a space machine instead of trying to do both at the same time, yeah? Priorities, you know?
❤1
You're supposed to judge a book by its cover. Especially the letters on it. thegardenoffreedom.com
❤3
From the river to the sea, Ceuta shall be free!
👍1
THE TYRANNY WITH NO AUDIENCE by ADAM VS THE MAN Imagine if they held an election and no one voted. Imagine if they threw a war, and no one showed up. Imagine if they made another tax, just to steal from you directly, and no one paid it. Imagine if they made another policy to steal from the poor to give to the rich and no one followed it. Imagine if they passed another law that was a threat to punish you for som…
👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thegardenoffreedom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gardenia” (@thegardenoffreedom), 264 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thegardenoffreedom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.