Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Lenny's Channel

@theeclipseherald

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

129subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001311824003
TypeChannel
Username@theeclipseherald
DescriptionЭкономист на досуге
Created7 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/theeclipseherald

Growth

1297 August 2026 — 129 subscribers9 August 2026 — 129 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:30129no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:41129first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
129.8%
avg views ÷ 129 subscribers
Avg views / post
168
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,005
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
346
Videos
29
Links
192

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4139.8%
👍3130.1%
🥰1514.6%
💅87.77%
😢43.88%
🤔43.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC115 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Забирай меня скорей Увози за сто морей Вслух читай Лавкрафта мне Я ведь взрослая уже

😁4

31 Jul 2026, 05:04 UTC178 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сегодня ранним утром ходил на лодке по каналам. С 2:00 до 8:00 запрещено движение катеров, поэтому по пути постоянно встречались сапборды. Движение культурное, все здороваются друг с другом, улыбаются. Проплываем мимо очередного сапа, на котором сидит девушка лет тридцати с банкой энергетика и курит ароматную чапу. — Доброе утро! — говорит она. — Приятного завтрака! — отвечаю я. Заулыбалась ещё сильнее.

👍8💅3

30 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Об эффекте протестного (не)знания Замечал, что среди оппозиционно настроенных граждан и им симпатизирующих бытует интересное явление — протестное (не)знание. Это убеждение, что они точно знают, как делать надо и не надо, как вообще устроен мир. В частности, в области экономики и политики, но иногда это (не)знание пугающе расползается и на все сферы жизни. Как оно проявляет себя? Случается что-то — как правило, непр

👍3

24 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC168 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Хороший и удачно короткий пост у Владимира про государство и гражданское общество, национальную и «транснациональную» самоорганизацию — на эту тему я как раз дебатировал с ныне известным блогером Штефановым в 2020 году.

👍2

16 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC215 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mgnzecon

100% российских патриотических каналов, которые у меня в ленте (не скажу, что я их все рекомендую читать, просто по работе они в ленте), радуются, что макс и вк удалили из плеймаркета. Реакции людей тоже 95% положительные. Почему так? Как методологи и социальные архитекторы добились того, что народ радуется тому, как запад удаляет российские соцсети из магазинов приложений? Это, безусловно, успех. Подписаться | Пре

👍2

14 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC188 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @slopushiPhoto

Переходим на кластеры из людей

7 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC249 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Абсолютная база. Трамп лучший, как всегда. Показывает идиотам, как устроен мир. Идиотов корёжит.

🥰3

5 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC210 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

«Часто мне приходится работать одному по ночам в своём кабинете, и я завёл себе котёнка, который привык спать на моём письменном столе и разделять со мной ночное одиночество», — Александр Колчак в письме к жене Софии, 20 октября 1919 года.

🥰12😢4💅1

2 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC232 viewsread 9 August 2026

Глава ЦБ очень верно заметила про связь ключевой ставки и льготных банковских ставок: бремя за существование «льготных» условий в конечном счёте ложится на обычных потребителей, которые расплачиваются более высокой ценой денег в экономике в целом. Мысль, которую неплохо было бы озвучить сразу следом: на самом деле, все «льготные ставки» в существующем виде — это в большей степени не про социальную поддержку каких-то

27 Jun 2026, 21:22 UTC192 viewsread 9 August 2026

Загадка в стиле ЧГК: Черчилль в замечаниях для министра иностранных дел Великобритании пишет, что «положение Пруссии как составной части германского государства должно стать предметом согласованной политики трёх великих держав Запада». Вопрос: какие государства он имеет ввиду?

25 Jun 2026, 21:14 UTC191 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Двое молодых парней, вероятно, студентов, а может и абитуриентов, встали рядом со мной на остановке. Один другому: — Э, тут так-то автобус только через 20 минут приедет. — Да ну? — Да я там по расписанию посмотрел. Оба вздыхают-охают, проверяют движение автобуса по электронным картам, кивают, и удаляются с остановки пешком. — Мы за 15 минут быстрее дойдём! Гляжу в их сторону, понимая, что направились они к тем же

😁9

17 Jun 2026, 10:48 UTC222 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Прикиньте такая демографическая мера поддержки: если вы отец ребёнка до 5 лет, вас освобождают от срочной службы. Опа? Или не

😁6👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @theeclipseherald. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 304,710 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lenny's Channel” (@theeclipseherald), 129 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theeclipseherald.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.