Забирай меня скорей Увози за сто морей Вслух читай Лавкрафта мне Я ведь взрослая уже
😁4

Channel
@theeclipseherald
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001311824003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theeclipseherald |
| Description | Экономист на досуге |
| Created | 7 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theeclipseherald |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 129 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 129 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 April 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,005 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
103 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 41 | 39.8% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 30.1% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 14.6% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 7.77% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 3.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Забирай меня скорей Увози за сто морей Вслух читай Лавкрафта мне Я ведь взрослая уже
😁4
Сегодня ранним утром ходил на лодке по каналам. С 2:00 до 8:00 запрещено движение катеров, поэтому по пути постоянно встречались сапборды. Движение культурное, все здороваются друг с другом, улыбаются. Проплываем мимо очередного сапа, на котором сидит девушка лет тридцати с банкой энергетика и курит ароматную чапу. — Доброе утро! — говорит она. — Приятного завтрака! — отвечаю я. Заулыбалась ещё сильнее.
👍8💅3
Об эффекте протестного (не)знания Замечал, что среди оппозиционно настроенных граждан и им симпатизирующих бытует интересное явление — протестное (не)знание. Это убеждение, что они точно знают, как делать надо и не надо, как вообще устроен мир. В частности, в области экономики и политики, но иногда это (не)знание пугающе расползается и на все сферы жизни. Как оно проявляет себя? Случается что-то — как правило, непр…
👍3
Хороший и удачно короткий пост у Владимира про государство и гражданское общество, национальную и «транснациональную» самоорганизацию — на эту тему я как раз дебатировал с ныне известным блогером Штефановым в 2020 году.
👍2
100% российских патриотических каналов, которые у меня в ленте (не скажу, что я их все рекомендую читать, просто по работе они в ленте), радуются, что макс и вк удалили из плеймаркета. Реакции людей тоже 95% положительные. Почему так? Как методологи и социальные архитекторы добились того, что народ радуется тому, как запад удаляет российские соцсети из магазинов приложений? Это, безусловно, успех. Подписаться | Пре…
👍2
Переходим на кластеры из людей
Абсолютная база. Трамп лучший, как всегда. Показывает идиотам, как устроен мир. Идиотов корёжит.
🥰3
«Часто мне приходится работать одному по ночам в своём кабинете, и я завёл себе котёнка, который привык спать на моём письменном столе и разделять со мной ночное одиночество», — Александр Колчак в письме к жене Софии, 20 октября 1919 года.
🥰12😢4💅1
Глава ЦБ очень верно заметила про связь ключевой ставки и льготных банковских ставок: бремя за существование «льготных» условий в конечном счёте ложится на обычных потребителей, которые расплачиваются более высокой ценой денег в экономике в целом. Мысль, которую неплохо было бы озвучить сразу следом: на самом деле, все «льготные ставки» в существующем виде — это в большей степени не про социальную поддержку каких-то…
Загадка в стиле ЧГК: Черчилль в замечаниях для министра иностранных дел Великобритании пишет, что «положение Пруссии как составной части германского государства должно стать предметом согласованной политики трёх великих держав Запада». Вопрос: какие государства он имеет ввиду?
Двое молодых парней, вероятно, студентов, а может и абитуриентов, встали рядом со мной на остановке. Один другому: — Э, тут так-то автобус только через 20 минут приедет. — Да ну? — Да я там по расписанию посмотрел. Оба вздыхают-охают, проверяют движение автобуса по электронным картам, кивают, и удаляются с остановки пешком. — Мы за 15 минут быстрее дойдём! Гляжу в их сторону, понимая, что направились они к тем же…
😁9
Прикиньте такая демографическая мера поддержки: если вы отец ребёнка до 5 лет, вас освобождают от срочной службы. Опа? Или не
😁6👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @theeclipseherald. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 304,710 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lenny's Channel” (@theeclipseherald), 129 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theeclipseherald.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.