DYOR

Channel
Ram’s Gems Calls ✨
@ramscalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,952subscribers
-78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002279192554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ramscalls |
| Description | Welcome to my trading journal. Disclaimer: Anything I share here is not financial advice, always do your own research. All content should be viewed as paid promotion. Owner: @P_rof_ram |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ramscalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 6,952 | -71 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 7,023 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 7,030 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 7,030 | first reading |
Engagement
69 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.7%
- avg views ÷ 6,952 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,090
- 69 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 69
- of 69 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 75,073 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,220
- Videos
- ≈149
- Links
- ≈2,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
So much PVP across chains on bot Like 15 diff coins all the same shit lmao Sucking up sm vol from other coins Just gives us a chance to scoop up our convictions on dips tho
$BUB - The Perma-Kitten is ready🐱 Gamble here at 120k..Good narrative and heard good team behind In 2013, two legends met: Grumpy Cat and Lil Bub. While one frowned the other one blepped and the internet never forgot that meeting. Fast forward: $GRUMPY ran to $240M+ on Solana and gave the frown the chapter it deserved. Now it's Lil Bub's turn. Lil Bub is the one of a kind perma-kitten who raised hundreds of thou…
fter cashcat hits billions looked at launchpads, for now Pons is #1 so i aped the main runner & top token there $TA FUND It ran to 26m and now consolidating at 5ish million before the real run up Basically its a Trump Account fund which is one of the biggest topics in america rn and one of the biggest topics trump brings up from his agenda Basically trump wanted to create accounts for kids of america and fund …
Photo, posted without a caption
I max bid $CATE here haven't seen a community this strong for a few years and poorgoat is doing an excellent job leading them Every post of his gets 200-300 instant likes on all platforms Made alot of noise on tiktok etc and onboarding alot of normies not to mention they also have 70,000 holderrs I like the narrative too Dog(e) Cat(e) Very normie friendly Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump
someone just sent me this for $seriouscat ^
They just onboarded an original $DOBO artist. For those that don't know DogeBonk hit 225mil in 2021. Very free right now, can't believe this ain't 7 figs yet.
stonk mooning but still cheap.
Photo, posted without a caption
$BINGUS Aped here, it’s the only cat ticker Murad has ever tweeted and said would do billions + he holds 20% + it’s launched by $Murad 40mil deployer ..still a gamble play so Dyor 180k FCjd5R4usXebjKT1RXo79GjSmWMuDvL7yJdDaJWYpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/DKrXDeGKKy8P4wXS1S3QuVWZrCoPhKiTsVJPGjUd9KD1 https://t.me/TheCatBingus
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @ramscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 163,968 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ram’s Gems Calls ✨” (@ramscalls), 6,952 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ramscalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.