Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Mark Attwood Show: Adventures in a Cosmic Suit 2

Channel

The Mark Attwood Show: Adventures in a Cosmic Suit 2

@theMarkAttwoodShow

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,902subscribers

+48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001679629231
TypeChannel
Username@theMarkAttwoodShow
DescriptionOfficial channel for The Mark Attwood Show. Https://themarkattwoodshow.com
Created12 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/theMarkAttwoodShow

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

20,85321,04420,948.56 August 2026 — 20,854 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,854 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,853 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,857 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,859 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,868 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,893 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,905 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,903 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,907 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,917 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,924 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,936 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,949 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,945 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,953 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,956 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,966 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,983 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,997 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,999 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,002 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,007 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,014 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,009 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,013 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,008 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,021 subscribers7 September 2026 — 21,043 subscribers10 September 2026 — 21,044 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,027 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,020 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,011 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,018 subscribers29 September 2026 — 20,990 subscribers5 October 2026 — 20,956 subscribers13 October 2026 — 20,954 subscribers14 October 2026 — 20,951 subscribers16 October 2026 — 20,955 subscribers17 October 2026 — 20,946 subscribers17 October 2026 — 20,936 subscribers18 October 2026 — 20,933 subscribers20 October 2026 — 20,930 subscribers21 October 2026 — 20,923 subscribers22 October 2026 — 20,919 subscribers23 October 2026 — 20,915 subscribers24 October 2026 — 20,913 subscribers25 October 2026 — 20,916 subscribers26 October 2026 — 20,913 subscribers27 October 2026 — 20,912 subscribers28 October 2026 — 20,909 subscribers29 October 2026 — 20,911 subscribers31 October 2026 — 20,908 subscribers1 November 2026 — 20,912 subscribers2 November 2026 — 20,914 subscribers3 November 2026 — 20,920 subscribers4 November 2026 — 20,916 subscribers5 November 2026 — 20,911 subscribers6 November 2026 — 20,906 subscribers7 November 2026 — 20,902 subscribers20,9026 August 20267 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 93 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,824–21,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 05:4120,902-4
6 Nov 2026, 06:5520,906-5
5 Nov 2026, 08:5720,911-5
4 Nov 2026, 10:3520,916-4
3 Nov 2026, 12:1620,920+6
2 Nov 2026, 14:5620,914+2
1 Nov 2026, 12:3620,912+4
31 Oct 2026, 09:5620,908-3
29 Oct 2026, 11:4520,911+2
28 Oct 2026, 13:0720,909-3
27 Oct 2026, 11:5020,912-1
26 Oct 2026, 09:5820,913-3
25 Oct 2026, 06:3120,916+3
24 Oct 2026, 05:0020,913-2
23 Oct 2026, 04:2720,915-4
22 Oct 2026, 06:3920,919-4
21 Oct 2026, 03:3720,923-7
20 Oct 2026, 00:4620,930-3
18 Oct 2026, 23:5820,933-3
17 Oct 2026, 23:0720,936first reading

Engagement

227 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 20,902 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,730
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 227 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held227 (2 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total171,610
Reactions total4,155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,420
Videos
≈1,530
Links
≈6,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
51s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

22,528 reactions across 227 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11,44650.8%
👍3,83417.0%
🔥2,66711.8%
😁1,0674.74%
👏7833.48%
🤣7123.16%
🤔3641.62%
💯2781.23%
🥰2341.04%
🙏2291.02%
⚡1240.55%
❤‍🔥1020.453%
🕊1020.453%
😢890.395%
👀880.391%
😱670.297%
🤩550.244%
👎410.182%
🤷‍♀370.164%
🤯310.138%
27 further kinds1780.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 227 of the 227 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,528 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 227 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 46 posts held from the last 30 days (2.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,250 views64 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

EM Burlingame at Frybrook

❤48🔥11👍2👏2🕊1

7 Nov 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,340 views80 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Blaine Holte in Ireland today

❤59👏11🔥9🕊1

7 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,820 views114 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Taking Craig Wright up Carrowkeel was not on my bingo card!

❤80😁20🤣11🎉2🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,810 views133 reactionsread 7 November 2026

https://x.com/MarkAttwood/status/2118979567453118528?a=eWq_D2vGBb2AL3y2H-o&s=20

❤115👏17🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC≈3,470 views96 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Connor Murray from the BSV Association

👏53❤25👍11🔥6🕊1

5 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC≈3,500 views140 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Neil Oliver on stage at Frybrook

👏74❤38👍14❤‍🔥9🔥4🕊1

5 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC≈3,490 views114 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Kurt Wuckert Jnr schooling everyone on the history of Bitcoin

👍71🔥19❤‍🔥15⚡4❤4🕊1

5 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC≈3,410 views105 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Gavin Mehl talking about the upcoming Bitcoin movie at Frybrook

👍63🔥22❤‍🔥13❤6🕊1

5 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC≈3,420 views128 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Sir Toshi takes the stage at Frybrook House today

👍61❤34👏16🔥7⚡6😁3🕊1

5 Nov 2026, 10:24 UTC≈3,380 views131 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Gary presenting at our BSV event

❤96🔥23⚡6👍5🕊1

5 Nov 2026, 07:54 UTC≈3,530 views53 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Lots of juicy stuff here on many things, especially of interest is the Ireland/UFO info from Miles Johnston https://somaarah.substack.com/p/miles-johnston-on-cosmic-voices-26th?r=1igf5&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

👍33❤15🔥5

5 Nov 2026, 07:52 UTC≈3,490 views43 reactionsread 7 November 2026

https://x.com/clif_high/status/2118125528440074732?a=aAj-wlQbUyiDdjW2wxM&s=20

🤯21👍15🔥4❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 227 posts we hold for @theMarkAttwoodShow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Abby Wynne
@abbywynneauthor · 2,400
#1
The Yorkshire Lass
@theyorkshirelassnews · 28,040
#2
LauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 165,455
#3
🇬🇧Bridget@SitUpTrueBritain🇬🇧
@BridgetSitUpTrueBritain · 3,969
#4
144,000 Light Warriors
@DavideB144 · 29,958
#5
Alexander Quinn - Ascension Channel
@alexanderquinn1 · 20,113
#6
FCB Pulse News Q Decodes
@FCBPODCAST · 22,693
#7
RACHEL - WRITESIDE BLONDE ®
@writesideblondeontelegram · 6,152
#8
Charlie Ward & Friends
@officialcharliewardfriends · 43,523
#9
Q) The Storm Rider /Official Page
@qthestormrider777 · 152,850
#10
AustraliaOneParty_Official
@australiaoneparty_official · 31,786
#11
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 101,516
#12
il Donaldo Trumpo
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 154,408
#13
ICONS(INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF NATURAL SOVEREIGNS)
@ICONS2021 · 24,182
#14
The SOVEREIGN Soul Show 😎
@TheSovereignSoul · 6,423
#15
Dr. Scott Young-END THE FED
@DrScottNESARA · 29,800
#16
Utsava
@utsavaprophecy · 23,955
#17
TRUTH PUPS
@TruthPups · 21,024
#18
Tartaria & History Channel
@TartariaHistoryChannel · 118,840
#19
GEORGENEWS
@georgenews · 140,927
#20
The Awakened Species ☀️
@awakenedspecies · 140,040
#21
Cosmic Light Force
@drue86 · 51,402
#22
Patriots Rising
@PatriotsRising1 · 30,914
#23
NewsTreason Channel 17 (Dave)
@newstreasonupdates · 35,311
#24
SOULS OF LIGHT
@SOULIGHTS · 1,108
#25
X22 Report Official
@realx22report · 157,577
#26
Renegade Media
@renegademedia · 3,346
#27
Andrew Bridgen
@ABridgen · 14,358
#28
Cruel History
@cruel_historyy · 103,035
#29
Intergalactic SpaceForce - Galactic Federation –Special Command
@SpaceForceGalacticFederation · 56,345
#30
Midnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸
@realKarliBonne · 180,033
#31
Q NEWS OFFICIAL #WWG1WGA 💛🇺🇸
@QNewsOfficialTV · 97,499
#32
The Justice League
@THEREALTORIABROOKE · 26,521
#33
D.S.M.P. NEXUS
@dsmpnexus · 5,102
#34
American Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@ishjay1960 · 29,294
#35
Intelsky 🚨
@Intelsky · 20,314
#36
Follow The White Rabbit ™ 🐇
@followsthewhiterabbit · 78,879
#37
Elena Danaan Official Channel ✨
@ElenaDanaanOfficialChannel · 16,410
#38
Nancy Drew
@KBlive · 121,608
#39
BioClandestine
@bioclandestine · 137,656
#40
Patriot Princess 777
@patriot_princess · 38,815
#41
CultivateElevate
@ElevateThyMind · 76,244
#42
Nicholas Veniamin
@NicholasVeniamin · 93,153
#43
🇺🇸👊🏻Richard Citizen Journalist 👊🏻🇺🇸
@Richardcitizenjournalists · 106,705
#44
✨Quantum Stellar Initiative (QSI)✨
@QuantumStellarInitiative · 30,647
#45
Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 579,958
#46
Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra · 144,758
#47
Jason Shurka
@jasonyosefshurka · 30,338
#48
ScrewBigGov.com - Lewis Herms
@ScrewBigGov · 18,365
#49
Barbara O'neill
@BarbaraOneillOfficial · 65,754
#50
Humor in een plandemie
@humorineenplandemie · 696
#51
AMG-NEWS.COM
@AMGNEWS2022 · 79,420
#52
DEEP DIVES
@DeepDives · 32,276
#53
QAZ EMPIRE 🇰🇿
@qazempire23 · 3,416
#54
Insider Paper
@insiderpaper · 107,904
#55
SantaSurfing
@SantaSurfing · 121,472
#56
Terra Genesis Innovations
@TerraGenesisInnovations · 1,393
#57
BlackRock Holdings
@blackrockholdings · 2,308
#58
RVhighlights
@RVhighlights · 27,490
#59
Beautiful universe
@BeautifulUniverse11 · 20,949
#60
Barbara O'Neill
@BarbaraOneill_official · 109,561
#61
ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸
@PepeMatter · 142,508
#62
The Gold Standard
@goldbusterschannel · 3,468
#63

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Alexander Quinn - Ascension Channel
@alexanderquinn1 · 20,113
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 27 September 2026
Tarot By Janine Channel
@TarotByJanineChannel · 54,050
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
FCB Pulse News Q Decodes
@FCBPODCAST · 22,693
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 20 September 2026
Utsava
@utsavaprophecy · 23,955
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 September 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official
@australiaoneparty_official · 31,786
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
Jason Shurka
@jasonyosefshurka · 30,338
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Mark Attwood Show: Adventures in a Cosmic Suit 2” (@theMarkAttwoodShow), 20,902 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theMarkAttwoodShow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.