Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alexander Quinn - Ascension Channel

Channel

Alexander Quinn - Ascension Channel

@alexanderquinn1

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

20,530subscribers

+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001255582913
TypeChannel
Username@alexanderquinn1
DescriptionStarseed - Navigating The Light
Created24 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alexanderquinn1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

23,600 average views per post against 20,530 subscribers — an engagement rate of 115.1%. Across the 6,789 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,600 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.65% and 15.4%, with a median of 7.16%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured10 of 10 published in the window (0 exact, 10 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled236,320
Mature posts only115.1% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers20,530 measured 15 August 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 6,789 channels · p10 0.734% · p25 2.65% · p50 7.16% · p75 15.4% · p90 27.7%
Position in cohort99.676th percentile · 16.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.037% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

20,44020,53020,4856 August 2026 — 20,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,454 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,449 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,442 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,446 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,443 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,440 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,450 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,492 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,530 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,427–20,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:3420,530+38
14 Aug 2026, 07:3420,492+42
13 Aug 2026, 00:4420,450+10
12 Aug 2026, 00:1320,440-3
10 Aug 2026, 23:5120,443-3
9 Aug 2026, 03:5220,446+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:3120,442-7
7 Aug 2026, 01:1520,449-5
6 Aug 2026, 03:3020,454no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:2320,454first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
116.1%
avg views ÷ 20,530 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,800
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held24 (22 June 202614 August 2026)
Views total238,340
Reactions total9,147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
609
Videos
139
Links
554

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

20,850 reactions across 24 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14,33268.7%
🙏2,77113.3%
👍9624.61%
❤‍🔥8944.29%
🔥6303.02%
🦄4282.05%
🐳2080.998%
👏1910.916%
🥰1600.767%
1490.715%
👌230.11%
🤩200.096%
🥴190.091%
🎉110.053%
🤔110.053%
🆒80.038%
😍80.038%
🤗70.034%
🍾60.029%
😁50.024%
3 further kinds70.034%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,850reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈9,040 views465 reactionsread 16 August 2026

The solar eclipse may be over, but the story is not. The eclipse itself was only the trigger. Now we begin to watch the ripples, and what unfolds over the coming days and weeks may prove far more important than what happened on the 12th itself. The aftermath has begun - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blTTKyz9i1Y

307🙏71🔥32❤‍🔥21🐳8👍7🦄73

13 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC≈16,100 views968 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dear All Many people will assume that yesterday’s eclipse was an event that simply arrived, peaked and passed. Energetically, the opposite is true. The eclipse itself was only the trigger. What matters most is not simply what happened during those few hours yesterday, but what begins unfolding because of them. Over the coming days and weeks, we will begin watching for what actually shifted, what was exposed, what ca

658🙏137❤‍🔥51👍50🦄20🔥18🐳15🥰6

12 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈24,900 views872 reactionsread 16 August 2026

The Lion’s Gate amplified the signal on the 8th. Today’s eclipse changes the mechanics of that energy. Rather than continuing to push consciousness outward, the energy moves into compression, interruption and reorganisation, almost as though the normal flow is temporarily suspended so everything that has been activated can rearrange itself. This is why today may feel strangely still yet incredibly intense at the same

602🙏122👍39🥰27❤‍🔥18🔥18🐳16🦄16

10 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈16,000 views1,031 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dear All, A Short Energy Update We are now firmly within the aftermath of the Lion’s Gate, and the energy has noticeably changed. The amplification of the 8th is beginning to move into integration, but we have very little time between these two enormous energetic markers because we are already moving towards the solar eclipse on the 12th. In many ways, the Lion’s Gate showed us what is trying to expand, while the e

686🙏156🔥57👍44🦄29❤‍🔥2218🐳11

5 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC≈17,100 views1,286 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dear All, The energies are really beginning to intensify now. We have entered the final build up towards the 8th, where the incoming frequencies continue gathering momentum and consciousness accelerates in preparation. If you've been feeling more tired, more emotional, more sensitive and intuitive or as though something within you is quietly changing, you're certainly not alone. Things in the lead up can sometimes

839🙏205❤‍🔥86👍72🦄35🔥1613🐳12

3 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈20,400 views789 reactionsread 16 August 2026

This is not an ordinary Lion's Gate. Every year we experience the power of the eighth day of the eighth month, but 2026 is different. This year the entire date itself also reduces to the number eight, creating what many spiritual teachers are now calling the Triple Eight Lion's Gate. The first eight comes from the eighth day. The second eight comes from the eighth month. The third eight is found when the entire date

531🙏84❤‍🔥60🔥39🦄27👍2013🐳7

31 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC≈32,200 views1,261 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Good Morning Everyone, As many of you know from my recent posts and my last YouTube video ( That gave three dates ), we have now entered what I can only describe as the corridor of acceleration. This is not a single energetic event, but a passage of consciousness. It is the space between one version of humanity and another, where the old is Rapidly dissolving while the new has not yet fully anchored itself. Corridor

871🙏210🔥51❤‍🔥45🦄26🐳15👍15🥰11

27 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC≈36,800 views1,028 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dear All Over the past few days, something very significant has taken place energetically on the energy of the planet. If you've woken up today feeling different, you're certainly not alone. We have just moved through two very powerful energetic markers, the Day Out of Time on the 25th July and the Galactic New Year on the 26th. The body will now need time to catch up to where consciousness has arrived, creating for

694🙏176❤‍🔥52🦄31👍21🔥2010🐳9

21 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC≈45,400 views723 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dear all, We now have three major energetic dates approaching that I believe will significantly reshape the energetic landscape over the coming weeks. As these three gateways build upon one another, many of you may also notice increased fatigue, unusual tiredness, changes in sleep, emotional waves and a feeling that your body simply needs far more rest than usual. In this video, I explain why I believe these three e

492🙏112❤‍🔥59👍23🦄15🔥9🐳5🤩4

20 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC≈20,400 views724 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dear All, I wanted to write this slightly ahead of time, not to create fear, but actually to reduce it. Whether you have already noticed it or not, we are now moving into what is going to be a very intense energetic period over the next 30 days. Many of you (although certainly not everyone) will begin feeling noticeably more tired than usual. For some, the fatigue may increase quite suddenly. If it does, don't panic

529🙏95👍33🦄18🔥17❤‍🔥9🐳8🥰8

16 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC≈18,800 views432 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

217🙏135👍33🔥19🦄16🐳8❤‍🔥4

16 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC≈17,100 views872 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dear All, Over the past few months I've spoken often about acceleration, and I believe we're now entering the next phase. Although the Sun appears relatively quiet, the energetic environment does not. Some of the greatest transformations occur beneath the surface long before anything becomes visible. Many of you may still be feeling unusually tired, emotionally detached, or sensing that something significant is drawi

538🙏173❤‍🔥62👍33🔥23🦄1614🐳7

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @alexanderquinn1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@alexanderquinn1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 18,032 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alexander Quinn - Ascension Channel” (@alexanderquinn1), 20,530 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexanderquinn1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.