Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ws群发~WhatsApp群发~ws磐石系统

Channel

ws群发~WhatsApp群发~ws磐石系统

@tgxdx1234

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,712subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002230447239
TypeChannel
Username@tgxdx1234
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tgxdx1234

Growth

1,7121,7171,714.56 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,715 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,713 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,712 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,711–1,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:351,712-1
12 Aug 2026, 22:251,713-2
10 Aug 2026, 04:581,715-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:011,717no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:511,717first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 6 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.3%
avg views ÷ 1,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (6 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,962
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥TeleTop 频道推荐 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 欧博代理 亚星代理 📢华纳圣淘沙赌场 📢华人大事件 新闻曝光 东南亚大事件 📢超凡国际娱乐 素材群 📢超燃混剪|搞笑配音|精彩片段 📢热点新闻 刑事案件🪻 📢亚星私网 亚星假网 欧博假网 欧博包杀 📢♠️HHPOKER /微扑克 ♠️德州扑... 📢电报引流|持续增粉 📢实事_求知_知性_群英会 💎广告推荐 📢✅【辉煌娱乐城93.CC】柬埔寨某盘总3... 📢✅金边娱乐城✅全网上押800万u盘总聚集... 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|... 🔍互推公示 🪧流量互推说明

6 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈2,020 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔥TeleTop 频道推荐 📢老挝缅甸 新闻 🪻 📢热点新闻 刑事犯罪🌎 📢Visa卡万事达MasterCard 📢新加坡新闻🪻 📢维基:求职招聘:(企业人才的沟通桥梁) 📢菲律宾新闻🪻 📢吃瓜搞笑 🌎 📢世界杯|五大联赛|足球推单 📢粤B情报搜索站 📢动漫聚宝盆 💎广告推荐 📢✅KK娱乐城✅敢赢就敢出💰累计出款超5... 📢✅金边娱乐城✅全网上押800万u盘总聚集... 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升V... 🔍互推公示 🪧流量互推说明

3 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

27 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

20 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTC≈2,110 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

13 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

6 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

29 Jun 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

22 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

15 Jun 2026, 10:59 UTC≈2,390 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

8 Jun 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

1 Jun 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @tgxdx1234. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 570,071 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ws群发~WhatsApp群发~ws磐石系统” (@tgxdx1234), 1,712 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgxdx1234.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.