Channel
@FLB_88
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
909subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003020257745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FLB_88 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FLB_88 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @feilvbin177/42835 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC | @FLB_88/4495 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC | 1.00 | 4.7 hours |
| @feilvbin177/42865 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC | @FLB_88/4496 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC | 1.00 | 36 minutes |
| @feilvbin177/42945 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC | @FLB_88/4504 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @FLB_88/4508 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC | @feilvbin177/43006 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @FLB_88/4509 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC | @feilvbin177/43016 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @FLB_88/4511 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC | @feilvbin177/43036 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @feilvbin177 | 18 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7 minutes | @feilvbin177 (13–5) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @feilvbin177. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 909 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 906 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 53 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#菲律宾新闻马卡蒂市发生枪击案一人死亡一人受伤 一名女子在马卡蒂市一起枪击事件中死亡，另一人受伤。 事件发生于当晚约6:45，地点位于马卡蒂市马卡蒂大道City Garden区域附近。 根据初步调查，两名女性受害者遭到身份不明的嫌疑人开枪袭击。 警方及相关部门接报后迅速赶到现场，并将两名伤者送往医院抢救，但其中一名女子到院时已被宣布死亡（DOA，Dead on Arrival）。 目前，执法部门仍在继续调查此案，以确认嫌疑人的身份以及作案动机。
#菲律宾新闻 菲南部海域突发 7.0级地震 达沃多地强烈震感 菲律宾火山地震研究所（PHIVOLCS）通报，8月5日中午12时13分，菲律宾南部海域发生7.0级地震。 此次地震震源深度约10公里，震中位于达沃西部省萨兰加尼市以南约258公里的海域。地震发生后，萨兰加尼市录得5级震感，当地居民明显感觉到房屋和地面晃动。菲律宾火山地震研究所表示，目前没有发现海啸威胁，也未发布沿海撤离警报。 截至目前，暂无人员伤亡或重大财产损失报告。当地政府和救灾部门正在持续检查受影响区域，后续情况仍有待进一步确认。
菲律宾卡加延德奥罗市街区突发火情 消防力量紧急处置 8月4日周二下午，菲律宾卡加延德奥罗市突发火灾事故，火情发生在该市7号社区的Burgos-JR Borja Extension道路沿线。火情突发后，当地迅速启动应急处置机制，官方消防局人员联合志愿消防队伍第一时间赶赴现场，全力开展灭火作业。 为保障救援工作高效推进，避免道路拥堵耽误救灾进度，当地政府紧急发布通行提示，呼吁过往车辆与民众主动绕行火灾事发路段，为消防救援车辆开辟畅通通道，确保救援人员能够快速开展火情扑救、现场排查等各项应急工作。目前现场灭火处置工作仍在有序进行中。
菲律宾抓获头号通缉犯，涉六项未成年强奸罪落网 8月5日，民马罗巴省头号通缉犯在朗布隆省落网。当地多部门联合开展专项抓捕行动，成功将这名身负六项未成年强奸罪的嫌疑人逮捕归案。本次行动由刑事调查和侦查组牵头，多支警务、情报及海事执法队伍协同配合。 警方依据当地法院7月22日签发的逮捕令实施抓捕，嫌疑人涉嫌违反菲律宾反强奸法等多项法规。目前嫌疑人已被控制，案件将依法开展后续审理工作。
菲律宾交通执法员执勤遇袭遭枪击 系当地第三起同类案件 菲律宾米沙亚普市发生一起恶意袭警案件，一名交通执法人员在执勤过程中遭不明枪手枪击重伤，生命垂危。事件发生于周二上午10时，43岁执法人员朱伊斯·雷贝拉尔·拉霍特在巴朗盖波布拉西翁1号一家面包店前执勤时，被暗处枪手从背后偷袭枪击。 监控画面显示，行凶者佩戴深色墨镜与白色口罩，身着无袖上衣和蓝色工装短裤，开枪后迅速驾乘摩托车逃窜，目前身份不明。伤者随即送医抢救，仍在全力救治中。 当地市长罗利·萨克达兰严厉谴责此次暴力袭警行径，下令警方全力追凶、严惩肇事者。由威廉·法克索伊中校带队的当地警局同步发声谴责该恶劣行为，并全面展开侦查与追捕工作。据悉，这已是米沙亚普市第三位执勤遇袭遭枪击的交通执法人员。
#医美乱象 #跨境行医 #消费者权益 11500比索的“医美陷阱”：菲律宾非法美容店为何屡禁不止？ 一块瘦脸针，一台纹眉机，一瓶未注册的美白针——这套“三无装备”竟能开出一家美容诊所。菲律宾国调局近日在甲米地市查处一家非法美容院，卧底探员以11500比索的“套餐价”引出无证美容师，现场逮捕。这并非孤例——此前BGC已有两名中国公民因非法行医落网。无执照、无资质、无注册产品的“三无”模式，以低价吸引消费者，却把安全风险完全转嫁给顾客。国调局特别强调：美容培训证书不等于合法执业资格，注射类操作必须由持证医生执行。非法医美的背后是暴利冲动，但消费者的脸和身体承担不起试错成本。这次抓人不是终点，而是提醒——美丽可以追求，但安全不能打折。
#菲律宾新闻 近半菲律宾民众认为这一项指控最致命 莎拉弹劾压力持续升温 菲律宾副总统莎拉弹劾案星期一继续审理。最新公布的一项民调显示，43%的受访者认为，“涉嫌行贿”是针对莎拉所有弹劾指控中最严重的一项；另有28%的人认为，滥用机密资金的问题最值得关注。 从年龄层来看，各年龄段受访者大多都把行贿列为最严重的指控。其中，25岁至34岁群体占比最高，达到52%。不过，在18岁至24岁的年轻受访者中，也有35%的人认为，机密资金的使用问题更严重，反映不少年轻选民更关注公共资金是否被合理使用。 这项调查由菲律宾大学独立研究机构OCTA Research进行，于7月4日至11日访问了1200名18岁及以上民众，误差范围为正负3个百分点。 与此同时，莎拉弹劾案已经进入第11天审讯。检方当天继续围绕副总统办公室及教育部使用的约6亿1250万比索机密资金展开举证，并传召相关审计人员出庭作证。 根据检方说法，这笔资金在申请、提取及核销…
🔥TeleTop 频道推荐 📢越南新闻🌎 📢TGRSS 总频道🔥Telegram ... 📢4K AI Wallpapers 📢Telegram优质资源导航 📢Clarkesworld科幻杂志 📢菲律宾新闻🪻 📢超凡国际娱乐 素材群 📢饺子 海外一手群发机房 📢电报热门资源 📢热点新闻 刑事案件🪻 💎广告推荐 📢⚽️注册送138🧧百家乐/棋牌/电竞体... 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|... 📢✅KK娱乐城✅敢赢就敢出💰累计出款超5... 🔍互推公示 🪧流量互推说明
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢台灣TWZP🔞高中生外... 📢精品课程|办公应用|付费... 📢国漫社|混子哥|动画 📢皇冠开户 皇冠注册 皇冠... 📢足球比赛 世界杯比赛 世... 📢东南亚狗仔队-热点新闻 📢电影解说|毒舌电影|一起... 📢模特 秀人网 📢港股票方|港股接盘|港股... 📢万利私网🅰️利博私网�... 📢兩性技巧，恋爱心理、情感... 📢利博官网 利博代理 利博... 📢综合格斗|MMA❤️ 📢利博官网 利博代理 利博... 📢套路直播 裸聊 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢182体育 2026世界杯指定投注平台、 免实名、不限ip、u存u提无上限 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 📢 飞驰号铺 [主营：飞机号 开会员 代充星星] 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 📢 TGFind🚀Telegram最高效的搜索平台！ 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @…
菲律宾阿布拉省政府军与武装分子交火，疑似新人民军成员 8月2日下午，菲律宾政府军在阿布拉省Licuan-Baa镇Bonglo村与约10名武装人员发生交火。据第503步兵旅初步报告，第50步兵营Alpha连由Joseph M. Gabinay中尉率领，在执行安全行动时遭遇该武装团体。 第5步兵师表示，这些武装人员据信为新人民军伊洛科斯-科迪勒拉地区委员会成员。第503步兵营称，将在核实细节后发布更多信息。目前伤亡情况及冲突细节尚未披露。
中国女子赴菲奔现后自述遭殴打，已连夜回国 据当事人公开讲述，她与一名菲律宾籍男子网恋约半年后，独自赴菲律宾见面，却在见面后不久遭对方以拳头及棍棒殴打，脸部、手部及身体多处出现淤青和伤痕。 女子称，她事后已向当地警方报案。由于身处异国、语言不通且担心再次受到伤害，她随后连夜购买机票返回中国，并以自身经历提醒网友：不要轻信网络中的“完美人设”，更不要在缺乏安全安排的情况下独自跨国奔现。 需要说明的是，目前公开信息主要来自当事人陈述，尚未见菲律宾警方公布完整案情或涉事男子回应，具体经过仍有待进一步确认。 安全提醒：如确需与网友见面，应选择商场、酒店大堂等公共场所，结伴同行并将行程告知亲友；避免前往私人住所或偏远区域。如在菲律宾遭遇人身威胁，应立即前往安全地点并拨打911报警，必要时联系中国驻菲律宾使领馆寻求领事保护与协助。
#菲律宾新闻 台湾男子在菲#撞人逃逸 被抓！还拿假出生证明冒充菲人 菲律宾移民局通报，一名34岁台湾男子因涉嫌在马里基纳市撞伤行人后逃逸，于7月29日被警方抓获。调查发现，该男子不仅无有效驾照，#还非法滞留菲律宾长达约7年，并曾使用假出生证明企图冒充菲律宾公民。 据悉，事发当天凌晨，该男子驾车经过马里基纳市康塞普西翁二区一处路口时，涉嫌撞上一名正在斑马线上过马路的62岁菲律宾男子，导致对方受伤送医。 警方调查事故时发现，男子无法提供合法驾照和身份证件。随后菲律宾移民局核查发现，他最后一次入境菲律宾是在2019年5月，此后一直未办理合法延期，长期逾期居留。 移民局进一步调查发现，该男子此前还曾试图利用伪造菲律宾出生证明，谎称自己是菲律宾公民，并企图凭借该身份出境，但最终被有关部门识破。 目前，该男子已被移交菲律宾移民局处理，面临移民违法指控及遣返程序。至于撞人逃逸案件，警方仍在进一步调查中。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FLB_88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 153,365 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾新闻🪻” (@FLB_88), 909 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FLB_88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.