Channel
@MD_522
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
911subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002778793400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MD_522 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MD_522 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @miandian177/50225 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC | @MD_522/5178 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @miandian177/50255 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC | @MD_522/5181 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @miandian177/50265 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC | @MD_522/5182 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @miandian177/50346 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC | @MD_522/5190 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @miandian177/50356 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC | @MD_522/5191 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @miandian177/50376 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC | @MD_522/5193 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @miandian177 | 16 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @miandian177 (16–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @miandian177. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 911 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 904 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 904 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 66 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#缅甸新闻 敏昂莱将于8月6日首次以总统身份访问泰国 聚焦边境安全与电诈合作 缅甸总统敏昂莱将于8月6日至7日对泰国展开正式访问。这是他卸任缅甸国防军总司令、转任文职总统后的首次访泰，也是缅甸近年来推动重返区域外交的重要一步。 据了解，敏昂莱抵达曼谷后，将在泰国政府大楼出席欢迎仪式，并与泰国首相阿努廷举行双边会谈。 分析认为，此次访问不仅关系到缅泰双边合作，也被视为缅甸试图摆脱国际孤立、重新融入区域事务的重要信号。不过，外界对其合法性仍存争议，不少西方国家及民主观察机构认为，缅甸此前举行的总统选举缺乏公信力。 此次会谈预计将重点讨论边境安全、打击跨境电诈、毒品走私、难民安置及经贸合作等议题。 目前，缅泰边境长期受到武装冲突、电诈园区及毒品犯罪影响。泰国希望借此机会加强双方合作，共同打击活跃在边境地区的诈骗集团和跨国犯罪网络。 与此同时，泰国外长西哈萨表示，泰方将在会谈中敦促缅甸进一步加大打击网络诈骗力度，并希望缅甸…
#缅甸资讯：大其力查获41名非法入境中国公民 8月5日凌晨，当局在大其力镇区检查站附近抓获2名非法越境中国籍男性，随后在万榜村再查获39人，共41人被捕。 据悉，此次行动与贩DU案件有关。41人已遭拘留，将被依《缅甸移民法》起诉
#万象警方捣毁4处电诈窝点抓获35涉诈嫌疑人 8月1日，万象市公安局治安处联合多部门开展专项清查行动，对西萨达纳县、西科达崩县共计4处网络代聊客服诈骗窝点实施突击抓捕，现场共抓获嫌疑人35名，查获大批电信网络诈骗作案工具。 在西萨达纳县东那孔村16巷、17巷两处窝点，抓获嫌疑人25名，其中女性4名；现场扣押台式电脑24台、手机18部以及打印机、碎纸机等涉案设备物资。 在西科达崩县占巴村、瓦岱内通村三江商贸城公寓两处窝点，抓获10名中国台湾籍嫌疑人。现场查获手机176部、笔记本电脑27台、信号接收器5台，查扣装有不明白色粉末的黑盒1个、保险柜1个，以及桌椅、床铺等涉案物品一批。 目前，35名嫌疑人均已被万象警方临时羁押。警方正对案件开展审讯调查，深挖案件线索，追查幕后相关人员。
缅北果敢回忆录：老街黑暗往事——从“淘金天堂”到人口贩卖链条 曾经的缅北果敢老街，在很多人眼中，是一个充满机会的地方。有人带着发财梦来到这里，有人相信所谓的“高薪工作”，踏上了一条改变人生的路。 但在一些幸存者的回忆里，老街的另一面，却隐藏着一条黑暗产业链。 招聘广告、高薪诱惑、熟人介绍……这些曾经是很多人进入果敢的第一步。有人以为自己只是来做客服、销售、技术岗位，却没想到等待自己的可能是限制自由、暴力控制，甚至成为犯罪集团交易链上的一环。相关调查显示，缅北部分地区曾存在以诈骗园区为依托的人口贩运、非法拘禁等犯罪行为。 在一些案件中，武装力量、地方势力和犯罪团伙之间复杂的关系，也让普通人难以逃离。一些受害者回忆，他们进入园区后，护照被扣押，行动受到限制，想离开需要支付高额“赎金”，甚至有人被转卖到其他地方。 果敢老街曾经灯火通明，赌场、酒店、园区林立，但繁华背后，是无数人的血泪经历。有人被骗走青春，有人失去自由，有人背…
公职人员虚报住房补贴致国家损失36亿印尼盾 8月5日，印尼波诺罗戈地区检察官办公室官宣侦破一起重大贪腐案件。当地人民民主革命委员会秘书处财务部门负责人被列为涉案嫌疑人，涉嫌在2023至2026年间违规操作议员住房补贴项目，恶意篡改补贴核算标准，套取公共资金。 该案最终造成国家财政损失高达36亿印尼盾。目前嫌疑人已被控制，办案团队正深挖资金流向、彻查全链条涉案人员，持续推进案件侦办工作。
韩国男子跨境运毒案二审开庭 近日，金边中院就一名韩国籍男子涉嫌跨境贩毒案开庭审理。被告金章恩（Kim Jang Eun，43岁）与其妻子于2024年在金边国际机场企图携毒出境至韩国时被捕，警方现场查获逾1200克冰毒及987克氯胺酮。 金边市法院此前判处两人各30年有期徒刑及8000万瑞尔罚金。两人随后提出上诉，期间妻子在狱中身亡。 金章恩在庭审中供认不讳，称系为还债替人运毒，并以需要照顾双亲为由请求减刑。中院将于8月中旬宣判。
#跨国犯罪 #人口贩运 #司法严惩 一部《角头》电影里的临时演员，在现实中扮演了远比剧本更残酷的角色——人口贩运集团的核心成员。竹联帮东堂成员李振豪以酒店老板身份为掩护，在疫情冲击下转向人口贩运，通过社交平台诱骗88名台湾民众赴柬埔寨，转卖至电诈园区。每卖一人获利1.7万美元，85人被送出境外，部分受害者遭受殴打和限制自由。台湾司法系统两案各判18年，合计36年，虽然合并执行最高30年，但已是人口贩运案件中的重刑。这起案件的警示不仅在于个人恶行，更在于它暴露的黑色产业链：从虚假招聘、证件办理、跨境转运到电诈园区，每一个环节都有人为之“服务”。李振豪的落网，只是这条链条上的一个断点。要真正斩断人口贩运，还需要更多跨国协作和源头治理。
#缅甸政治 #国际关系 #人道主义外交 一张照片背后的外交棋局：昂山素季会见红十字会释放何种信号？ 一张照片，81岁的昂山素季，红十字国际委员会——这三个元素放在一起，构成了一次耐人寻味的外交信号释放。缅方罕见公开昂山素季在内比都会见红十字会代表的照片，这与之前拒绝东盟特使探访的强硬姿态形成鲜明对比。缅甸此举有三层用意：一是回应外界对其健康状况的猜测，借红十字会的专业形象为自己背书；二是通过中立人道机构建立间接沟通渠道，缓解国际舆论压力；三是以柔性姿态试探各方反应，为改善自身国际处境寻找突破口。这并非局势即将转向的征兆，而更像一盘慢棋——缅方在棋盘上轻轻挪动了一颗棋子，等待对方如何回应。
校园惊现新型毒电子烟，议员投诉彻查学生吸食魔幻电子烟乱象 8月5日，马来西亚山打根出现校园涉毒乱象，当地州议员邓靖强向警方肃毒组投诉，网传视频曝光有学生吸食含“飘飘”“魔幻蘑菇”的新型毒电子烟。这类伪装普通电子烟的产品含精神活性物质，悄然在学生群体蔓延，严重威胁青少年身心健康与校园安全。 议员已对接警方跟进调查，要求查清涉事人员、电子烟成分，深挖供货、销售黑链，重点打击向未成年人售毒的不法分子。同时实地走访巴士总站，排查学生聚集高危区域，建议多方加强巡逻管控，联动家校社会合力遏制新型毒品蔓延。
#缅甸新闻 亚细安重新接触缅甸，军政府真能回归了吗？ 亚细安和缅甸之间的关系最近出现了新变化。前段时间，亚细安外长时隔五年再次与缅甸外长面对面会谈，而缅甸总统敏昂莱也将在本周访问泰国，让不少人开始讨论：缅甸是不是准备重新回到亚细安核心圈？ 不过，从目前来看，双方恢复沟通，并不代表亚细安已经重新接受缅甸军政府。 自2021年缅甸政局发生变化后，亚细安一直限制军政府参加高层政治会议，同时推动落实“五点共识”。但几年过去，这套机制并没有真正改善缅甸局势，内战、人道危机、难民外流以及电诈、毒品等跨境问题反而越来越严重，也开始直接影响周边国家。 分析认为，亚细安如今选择重新建立沟通渠道，更像是一种务实调整，希望在救灾、人道援助、跨境犯罪等问题上保持合作，而不是改变对缅甸军政府的整体立场。 另一边，缅甸军政府显然希望借着恢复接触，逐步打破外交孤立，希望获得更多国际认可。但敏昂莱近期依然公开批评亚细安提出的“五点共识”，双方在核心…
🔥TeleTop 频道推荐 📢无损音乐生活flac 📢cosplay|六二二同学 📢Telegram优质资源导航 📢Affect3D动画视频 📢电报零粉起步轻松涨粉 📢富贵WS啦群｜机房 📢柬埔寨新闻|热点新闻 📢国际新闻|吃瓜新闻|突发事件 📢伟哥果冻 延时助勃壮阳药 📢币圈行情分析频道 💎广告推荐 📢飞哥数据🌍SDK·DPI⚙️钉钉💰支... 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升V... 📢✅金边娱乐城✅全网上押800万u盘总聚集... 🔍互推公示 🪧流量互推说明
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢大偉探秘|小乌说案 📢🇯🇵紗奈の日本東京大... 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 皇冠... 📢利博官网 利博代理 利博... 📢欧博私网 欧博代理 亚星... 📢亚星私网🅰️皇冠体育�... 📢万利私网🅰️利博私网�... 📢足球比赛 世界杯比赛 世... 📢欧博私网 欧博代理 亚星... 📢足球下注 世界杯买球 世... 📢欧博假网 亚星假网 皇冠... 📢TWZP🔞女學生的裸體... 📢利博官网 利博代理 利博... 📢超级文爱语爱色涩裸聊 📢泰国新闻 🪻 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢专业Telegram账号交易平台🔥热门社交媒体账号交易 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 ✅【铂莱娱乐bolai.com】8年老台 世界杯指定投注平台 全网上押1300万u 📢 全网最全面、最便宜的自助引流服务 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MD_522. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 313,376 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“老挝缅甸 新闻 🪻” (@MD_522), 911 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MD_522.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.