Channel
@tgcn123
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,211subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001238542362 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tgcn123 |
| Description | 分享优质内容 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tgcn123 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 5,211 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 5,218 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 5,220 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 5,220 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 March 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 484 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7月25日，《外交学人》刊文称，揭阳流浪狗“旺旺”遭虐杀后，网民自发众筹，在全球200多块屏幕投放纪念广告。 但大陆多地纪念屏、壁画和帖子遭清理，一份据称来自沈阳网信部门的通知，更将相关行动列为“政治风险”。 文章指出，旺旺行动没有领袖，依靠小额众筹，却能在数日内跨越多个城市和地区展开，显示中国民间仍具备横向联络、快速筹款和统一表达的能力。 在中国，虐杀动物缺乏完整法律追责机制； 但悼念一只狗、呼吁制定反虐待动物法，却迅速触发了删帖、封屏、警方介入和“境外势力”指控。 作者认为，当局真正恐惧的不是爱狗，而是普通人不经官方批准，也能自行组织起来。 旺旺事件也证明，在长期打压之下，中国公民社会并没有完全消失。 查看原文
https://youtu.be/Td0-R6a0CQA
https://youtu.be/nNcJxOd8T9o
https://chinadigitaltimes.net/chinese/gossip-beta
【你正在翻墙吗？请花5分钟帮个小忙】 翻墙工具蓝灯（Lantern）正与加思塔实验室（Gazzetta Lab）联合开展一项匿名的调研，想听听一线中国翻墙用户的真实声音： · 你平时在用哪些翻墙服务？ · 你最看重的是什么——速度、稳定性、隐私，还是其他？ · 现在翻墙工具让你用起来最让你头疼的地方是什么？ 这项调查你完全匿名，填写完也只要5分钟，但你的反馈会直接影响蓝灯及其他翻墙工具未来的产品方向。非常感谢你的帮助：https://lantern.limesurvey.net/375772?src=cdt
https://youtu.be/bvesUTW1B7s 境外势力更新了，我亲自点赞观看评论❤
你没看过的六四 系列图片展23 "一滩血迹与一只鞋子" 6月4日解放军镇压屠杀后，长安街上。 照片中央下方，是一滩已经发黑的血，沿着双黄线慢慢渗开。血迹旁边，孤零零地躺着一只布鞋。路上，一道道坦克履带的压痕清晰可见。 那双鞋的主人是谁，没有人知道。他多大年纪，从哪里来，那天夜里为什么走在这条街上，后来被送去了哪里，是死是活，都没有人知道。 我们只知道，在中共清理现场消灭证据前，有人路过了这条街，看见地上的血，看见那只没有主人的鞋，然后悄悄地举起了相机，保留下了这份军队屠杀人民的证据。 拒绝遗忘，真相存在于民间，欢迎私信向 @hrichina 投稿您手中的八九六四历史见证！ 查看原文 📝 引用推文: 在六四37周年即将到来之际，我们与 中国人权 @hrichina 和人道中国 @HChina89 共同推出 #你没看过的六四 珍贵历史图片展。 提到1989年，许多人的记忆或许只停留在北京天安门，但事实上，那场民主浪…
今天是文化大革命發動六十週年 （點此閱讀更多）
https://youtu.be/XQEWs1CP2WY
境外势力恶意煽动躺平、忙得脚不沾地 国安部宣：近年来，境外反华敌对势力借助网络平台，刻意放大社会焦虑，歪曲解读发展问题，不断渲染 “努力无用” “奋斗吃亏” 等消极观念，试图通过制造负面情绪，将个体困境上升为群体对立，让青年在不知不觉中被误导、被裹挟，进而消解我国青年的奋斗信念，甚至动摇社会的价值根基。 青年兴则国家兴，青年强则国家强。“躺平” 或许能换来一时安逸，却注定错失一路风景；妥协也许能逃避眼前压力，却永远无法抵达理想的彼岸。 愿每一位青年朋友都能守住初心、站稳立场，不被杂音干扰，不被迷雾遮挡，在最好的年华里向阳而生，把青春奋斗融入强国建设、民族复兴的伟大征程，书写无愧于时代的精彩答卷。 ✍️ 不知本月以来，那些挂着境外 IP 的敌对势力是否消散了许多？ #新闻
https://youtu.be/qtuXnm04AXQ
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tgcn123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tgcn123 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“电报中文频道” (@tgcn123), 5,211 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgcn123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.