Channel
@tether011
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
800subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002265269792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tether011 |
| Description | Нет финансовых рекомендаций Всю ответственность берёте на себе dm: @btcoffshore |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tether011 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 800 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 800 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
659 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 157 | 23.8% | |
| ❤ | 118 | 17.9% | |
| 🤣 | 81 | 12.3% | |
| 🐳 | 62 | 9.41% | |
| 🖕 | 50 | 7.59% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 4.55% | |
| 👻 | 25 | 3.79% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 3.34% | |
| 😭 | 21 | 3.19% | |
| 💩 | 19 | 2.88% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 2.73% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 1.97% | |
| 💊 | 10 | 1.52% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 1.37% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.06% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.455% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.303% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.303% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.152% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.303% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 659reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2025 to 7 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tether011. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2025 to 7 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пацаны как вы поняли я забил на медийку и канал забросил хочу вам порекомендовать канал знакомого за которым слежу попросил поддержать https://t.me/web3memoriess Подпишитесь, сун будет большой гив на 5к подписчиков, канал Андрюнина
😁27🤣25💊10🍌2
столько мыслей в голове все на кучу но не хочу вам душу изливать так как 70% процентов тут хуесосы которые радуются чужим проебам
😁43😢18💔13⚡3
не было желания выходить вчера, по итогу закрылся не выдержал, все лето торговал исключительно в плюс понятно были минуса но не значительные на дистанции я выходил в плюс и не плохой, и тут начало осени такой плевок в лицо, рынок так резко активизировался чего я не ожидал, как по мне так самый главный навык в трейдинге это адаптироваться под рынок сейчас в моменте, любой кто говорит в 2025 про стабильность, заинтерес…
😁28❤15👻10👍5
добирался на 5000 токенов по 16 потом продал их уже и минус не такой большой кажется 🙂
🖕19❤1
чуть получше ситуация
🖕19⚡4🔥3😁2
двф>тезер 🤓
🖕12😁12
без комментариев еще и добирался долбоеб ебанный
🤣15❤11👻3🫡2
Photo, posted without a caption
😭21👻12😍6🥰2
заходите в щитпост кого нету вы колл там проебали пиздец какой вкусный https://t.me/+41YsxGKReStlYzI8 https://t.me/+41YsxGKReStlYzI8 https://t.me/+41YsxGKReStlYzI8
🤣38❤4🐳2🌭1
Я в ахуе что много людей вообще не шарят за проп трейдинг так вот пост для них На самом деле пропки это тема если у вас нет большого депа и тд. Если вкратце и по простому то вы просто торгуете не на свои деньги, то есть проп фирма дает вам свои деньги под управление которыми вы торгуете, но не все так просто, там есть большой ряд правил которые отсеивают всех лудиков, там лудить не получится. Я знаю очень много люде…
❤11🤣3
заметил последнее время новый паттерн монеты которые листятся на бинанс фьючи укатываются после листинга на 30-50% встают в накопление неделя две и потом пампят резко на 100-200% $HOME $SPK $DMC $H $NEWT и другие На что обратить внимание? Следите за листингами последних 1-2 месяцев Отмечайте монеты которые в дампе и в накоплении трекайте кошельки холдеров крупных Ждать выход из локальных диапазанов и обратить вн…
❤13🐳5👍3
Завтра в щитпосте сделаю стрим вечером где-то разберу кошельки ммов которые аккумулировали токены и сдампили на хаях, будет интересно, про ончейн немного расскажу вам в целом на вопросы ваши по отвечаю, по времени завтра точно скажу кого в щитпосте нет сабайтесь ссылка на щитпост https://t.me/+41YsxGKReStlYzI8 https://t.me/+41YsxGKReStlYzI8 https://t.me/+41YsxGKReStlYzI8
❤4🐳3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tether011. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 610,541 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tether флипает” (@tether011), 800 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tether011.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.