Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -283. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,773–15,140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 05:40
14,815
-30
18 Sept 2026, 21:58
14,845
-4
16 Sept 2026, 13:55
14,849
-14
14 Sept 2026, 17:41
14,863
-6
13 Sept 2026, 02:56
14,869
-6
11 Sept 2026, 07:39
14,875
-6
8 Sept 2026, 15:36
14,881
-11
5 Sept 2026, 11:22
14,892
-9
3 Sept 2026, 14:39
14,901
-6
2 Sept 2026, 07:46
14,907
-6
1 Sept 2026, 10:37
14,913
-6
31 Aug 2026, 13:26
14,919
-10
30 Aug 2026, 10:57
14,929
-12
29 Aug 2026, 08:34
14,941
-16
28 Aug 2026, 07:16
14,957
-35
27 Aug 2026, 10:38
14,992
-5
26 Aug 2026, 07:03
14,997
-5
25 Aug 2026, 05:37
15,002
-7
24 Aug 2026, 08:03
15,009
-10
22 Aug 2026, 13:58
15,019
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 24 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
995 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
347
34.9%
🔥
188
18.9%
❤🔥
176
17.7%
😁
80
8.04%
💊
59
5.93%
🤣
56
5.63%
❤
31
3.12%
👏
16
1.61%
🤯
11
1.11%
🍌
8
0.804%
🌭
7
0.704%
☃
5
0.503%
👀
3
0.302%
😴
3
0.302%
🗿
2
0.201%
⚡
1
0.101%
🐳
1
0.101%
🦄
1
0.101%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 995 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2025 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
182
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 19 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
91
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @terncrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2025 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Заклеймил.
Кароче точно могу рекомендовать эту книгу если вы хотите найти нового себя. Оказалось что большинство действий я уже делал на автомате, но теперь я составил из этого план.
За 2 месяца я попробовал помонтировать видосы, поделать ботов и поиграться с ии, но в моменте прочтения понял что это интересы старой версии меня, которые я пытаюсь пересобрать.
Поэтому понял что надо кинуть себя вообще в новые вариан…
Полгода без постов. Поиск новых смыслов. Кризис. Новое начало. (Part 4/4)
Читать сначала 🔼
Заселившись в квартиру, из которой не нужно будет съезжать через неделю, я наконец получил эту пустоту, сегодня ровно месяц как я пробыл в этом состоянии и черт возьми, как же это круто, но одновременно и очень тяжело, когда ты всю жизнь жил в противоположном режиме. Я начал активно изучать все ai-тулы, улучшать свой инглиш, …
Полгода без постов. Поиск новых смыслов. Кризис. Новое начало. (Part 3/4)
Читать сначала 🔼
Однако проснувшись на утро, я узнаю что покупатель уже был найден. Это конечно весьма даже настораживает, но мне уже как-то пофиг. Весь день проходит грустно и тяжело, то самое принятие перед самим собой, что не получилось. Оно тянулось полгода, но фоново. Сегодня его много, но в последний раз. Вечером, вернувшись домой, мне …
Полгода без постов. Поиск новых смыслов. Кризис. Новое начало. (Part 2/4)
Читать сначала 🔼
По итогу в декабре я решаю, что мы доделаем маркетплейс, и я стопаю проект, если не увижу каких-то вау цифр. Примерно на этом моменте, мне пришло осознание, что на самом деле весь этот длинный путь, вся эта работа была просто ради моей детской мечты. Я с 17 года сидел и трейдил эти скины и сидел на чьих-то площадках. И мне оч…
Полгода без постов. Поиск новых смыслов. Кризис. Новое начало. (Part 1/4)
В конце прошлого года я окончательно осознал что я в кризисе. Такие моменты уже были в моей жизни, например когда я перегорал с трейда в Steam в 21 году, или с крипты в 22. Со мной в течении всего года происходили тяжелые моменты, в один момент я решил писать про них в лайф-канале, а потом просто решил начать вести личный дневник в тетрадку. И…
Я чувствую бычку 🤠
Опубликовали новые правила для мастерской Steam, если их принимаешь то все твои работы Valve могут лицензировать, а тебе заплатят за это фикс. Сумму.
Настроен процесс, значит в нем заинтересованы разработчики, в целом в последнее время видно как активно ведется работа.
Мне как участнику рынка приятно за этим наблюдать, лучшее время со сферой происходит здесь и сейчас. Не во время ксдабл или лаун…
Ищем поставщика WeChat/Alipay баланса
Берем каждый день на крупные чеки, если вы готовы дать хороший курс, пишите с оффером сюда!
Скидывайте своим знакомым перестановщикам, будем соприкасаться :)
ПОСТРОЙ СВОЙ МАРКЕТПЛЕЙС ПО CS2
У меня есть такой проект - Steamify. И в него мы ищем талантливого и заряженного бекенд разработчика, готового строить торговую площадку игровых предметов.
В последнее время я думаю очень много кто слышал про скины изо всех утюгов, а теперь представьте что вместо скучной разработки вы можете запрыгнуть к нам и получить:
1. Молодую команду заряженных ребят. В команде разработки у нас…
Отработка будет??
Естественно. Я нашел кванта и мы начали профессиональную разработку HFT в Steam. Пока что я не знаю чего ожидать, но вроде бы мы готовы и в 10 утра будет скан новой ликвидности.
Момент очень интересный, заставляет адаптироваться, появляется много неэффективностей.
Много кто реально реагирует на панике на этих событиях.
Забавно наблюдать как Steamify превратился из трейдбота->миниапп->пополнениеС…
👍15
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @terncrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@terncrypto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@cybers named in 9 posts, 8 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“tern.ceo 🧑🏻⚖️” (@terncrypto), 14,815 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/terncrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.