Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Conetic Yap

Channel

Conetic Yap

@conbuystars11

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,377subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002022379903
TypeChannel
Username@conbuystars11
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/conbuystars11

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3771,4721,424.56 August 2026 — 1,472 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,472 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,469 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,460 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,444 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,439 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,427 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,421 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,415 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,412 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,404 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,394 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,385 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,377 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,363–1,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:401,377-8
15 Sept 2026, 04:001,385-9
11 Sept 2026, 02:581,394-10
6 Sept 2026, 04:201,404-8
1 Sept 2026, 14:551,412-3
30 Aug 2026, 01:371,415-6
26 Aug 2026, 21:531,421-6
24 Aug 2026, 04:171,427-12
20 Aug 2026, 02:071,439-5
17 Aug 2026, 11:471,444-16
13 Aug 2026, 15:081,460-9
10 Aug 2026, 04:401,469-3
7 Aug 2026, 02:031,472no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:171,472first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣626.1%
521.7%
👎521.7%
🔥313.0%
😭28.70%
🗿14.35%
🤨14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 00:58 UTC105 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌎 Sources: @telenews ⚠️ JUST IN: Telegram Disappears From iOS App Store Telegram has disappeared from the App Store for all iOS users. The reason for the removal is currently unknown. @ConeticNews

Signed oliver

12 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC893 viewsread 6 August 2026

Make sure to join the main channel for news @coneticnews

Signed swag

22 May 2026, 23:30 UTC≈4,570 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

DWC Users ⚠️JUST IN: John Lick was spotted in court after being arrested. On May 21, John was seen being escorted by police officers on an island, where he is facing charges for stealing $46 million in cryptocurrency from the U.S. government. Sponsored by @TonSpamming @ConeticNews

22 May 2026, 23:21 UTC≈2,810 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Feds ⚠️John Daghita (@lick) appeared this morning before the indictment chamber in Basse-Terre over a U.S. extradition request. He’s suspected of stealing $46M in crypto from the federal government. Sponsored by @TonSpamming @ConeticNews

22 May 2026, 23:08 UTC≈1,650 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Observer ⚠️ JUST IN: Dutch police "Game Over!?" campaign In March 2026, Dutch police posted blurred CCTV photos of 100 suspected fraudsters on billboards, motorways and social media, giving them two weeks to turn themselves in before being publicly unblurred. 34 surrendered voluntarily. 40 more identified via 500+ public tips. 6 arrested. Youngest suspect is 14 years old and the average age is 22. Sponsored by @T

🤨1

22 May 2026, 20:58 UTC≈1,280 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

DWC Users ⚠️JUST IN: The hacker behind a recent 100+ BTC (~$10M+) theft has returned $8.5M to the victim. The threat actor kept 1,350 ETH ($2.8M) as a reward for themselves, while the remaining stolen funds were returned to the victim. Sponsored by @TonSpamming @ConeticNews

🤣42

22 May 2026, 11:37 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

TeleNews ⚠️ JUST IN: ZachXBT Potentially Doxxed on X A thread on X claims to have doxxed ZachXBT, citing public court documents and posting alleged photos. The thread has gained traction in crypto circles. Sponsored by @TonSpamming @ConeticNews

22 May 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,080 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Feds ⚠️ ZachXBT possibly doxxed (posting his photo in reply section) A thread on X claims he’s Zachary Wolk, citing public court docs. Full thread link Sponsored by @TonSpamming @ConeticNews

🔥1

22 May 2026, 10:52 UTC911 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Observer ⚠️ JUST IN: Someone investigated ZachXBT An anonymous researcher has published a detailed thread identifying ZachXBT as Zachary Wolk from Austin, Texas, sourced from public court documents, a competitive swimming database and a local newspaper. The deanonymization is just the start. The thread alleges: 🔴 $580K received from Hyperliquid, followed by 4 months of zero critical investigations into them 🔴 CZ

22 May 2026, 10:48 UTC746 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚠️JUST IN: ZachXBT's real identity has been exposed A thread by matthewabides claims to have identified him as Zachary Wolk, using public court docs, swim records & a local newspaper Thread also alleges ~$5M in "donations" from people who never appear in his investigations, and potential insider trading ahead of his Axiom exposé. Sponsored by @TonSpamming @ConeticNews

22 May 2026, 10:33 UTC692 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

DWC Users ⚠️JUST IN: A Polymarket admin address appears to have been compromised. Over $600K has been stolen so far, with attackers continuing to drain wallets roughly every 30 seconds. Sponsored by @TonSpamming @ConeticNews

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @conbuystars11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Conetic Yap” (@conbuystars11), 1,377 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conbuystars11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.