https://youtu.be/mV2AQ8OYNT8?is=PnRzFnLOzm4IeZqb دوستان این ویدئو را سعی کنید چند بار مشاهده بفرمایید باور کنید اگر این موضوع را خوب درک بکنید کیفیت زندگی، شغل، رابطه و … افزایش پیدا می کند. @Tekrargar
👍13

Channel
@tekrargar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,463subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001471773146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tekrargar |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tekrargar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 2,463 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 2,460 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 2,466 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 2,467 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 April 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 568 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
353 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 290 | 82.2% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 10.2% | |
| 🤯 | 16 | 4.53% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.85% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.567% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.567% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.567% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.283% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.283% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tekrargar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 April 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://youtu.be/mV2AQ8OYNT8?is=PnRzFnLOzm4IeZqb دوستان این ویدئو را سعی کنید چند بار مشاهده بفرمایید باور کنید اگر این موضوع را خوب درک بکنید کیفیت زندگی، شغل، رابطه و … افزایش پیدا می کند. @Tekrargar
👍13
چین در راستای تلاش برای آمادهسازی جهت ورود به عصر هوش مصنوعی، ۱۲,۰۰۰ رشته دانشگاهی «منسوخشده» را حذف کرد. بسیاری از مدرکهای دانشگاهی در آینده تا حد زیادی بیاهمیت و بیفایده خواهند بود. @Tekrargar
👍21
موج دیگری از اخراجهای دستهجمعی: < کلیکآپ (ClickUp): ۲۲٪ تعدیل < متا (Meta): ۱۰٪ تعدیل < اینتوئیت (Intuit): ۲۲٪ تعدیل < کوینبیس (Coinbase): ۱۴٪ تعدیل < آمازون (Amazon): ۱۰٪ تعدیل < بلاک (Block): ۴۰٪ تعدیل اگر تا الان متوجه نشدهاید، اولویت شماره یک شما باید تسلط بر هوش مصنوعی باشد. @Tekrargar
👍30
💡 کلید طلایی هوش مصنوعی: کانتکست (Context) چیست؟ آیا تا حالا شده از هوش مصنوعی سوال بپرسید و جوابهای کلی و بیربط بگیرید؟ مشکل از هوش مصنوعی نیست، مشکل از نبودِ Context یا همان «بافتار و زمینه» است! بیا سادهش کنیم: هوش مصنوعی مثل یک کارمند نابغه اما بدون حافظه است. اگر بهش بگی «برام یه متن بنویس»، نمیدونه برای کی، با چه لحنی و با چه هدفی! کانتکست یعنی دادنِ «نقشه راه» به AI. ✅ اجزای یک کانتکست حرفهای (فرمول Con…
👍31
یک مشکلی که من با هوش مصنوعی پیدا کردم این آخرا حس گناه هست یا شاید یک حس کم کاری کردن. یعنی چی؟ یعنی وقتی که یک کاری را با هوش مصنوعی انجام میدم که قبلا باید براش ۳ الی ۵ ساعت وقت صرف می کردم و الان توی ۳ الی ۵ دقیقه انجام میشه حس میکنم که کار را درست انجام ندادم. 😂😂 میگم نکنه دارم کم کاری میکنم!؟ 😉 به تازگی شروع کردم برای یک سری کارهای تکراری ایجنت های مختلف توصه دادم و آن ایجینتها دقیقا کار خودم را انجام می دهند و…
👍32👏4🤔2🙈1
یک دستار درست کردم که هر ایده استارتاپی بهش بدی را برات نقد میکنه و میگه که اگر ایده ای که داری را با این شرایط ببری توی بازار آیا جواب میده یا نه اگر دوست داشتید چکش کنید روی Gems های جیمنای کار میکنه باید ریکوئست بدید دسترسی را براتون فعال کنم. فعلا دارم روش کار میکنم برای همین پابلیک نکردمش روی این آدرس می تونید پیداش کنید. http://tekrargar.com/aistartup @Tekrargar
👍21
نمی دانم این پیغام ها را اگر ۲ یا ۳ سال آینده ببینم به چی فکر خواهم کرد. اما الان که دارم هر روز در مورد آینده هوش مصنوعی مطالعه میکنم همه چیز برام عجیب تر و عجیبت تر میشه! این حجم از خلاقیت بسیار عجیب است و ترسناک! @Tekrargar
👍27👎1
امروز یک محصول جدید هوش مصنوعی را برام پرزنت کردن مغزم سوت کشید!!! یک هوش مصنوعی درست کردند که کارهای تخصصی یک شرکت را انجام میده مثل مدیرعامل٬ مدیر فنی٬ مدیر حسابداری حتی طراحان و غیره. بعد این هوش مصنوعی در هر کدام از حوزه ها از یک مدل زبانی استفاده می کند و برای بعضی از ساب تسک ها هم مدل دیگر. قشنگ یک دنیای مجازی از ایجنت ها داخل یک پلتفرم برای پیاده کردن کارهای یک شرکت. رسما می تونم بگم داریم نابود میشیم توسط خود…
🤯15👍14😱3🙈1
https://youtu.be/X3Y9_3LqDWM یک پادکست جدید در کانال یوتیوب تکرارگر پادکست
👍5
هوش مصنوعی یک طوری داره رشد میکنه که اگر فقط بخوای ابزارهایی که با هوش مصنوعی کار می کنند را یادبگیری و ببینی مدلهای هوش مصنوعی چه مدلی کار می کنند وقت کم میاری!
👍15
خواستم تشکر کنم از این دوستی که به مطالب با استار واکنش نشان میده. دمت گرم بابت انرژی مثبتی که میدی.
👏15👍1
چگونه در سال ۲۰۲۶ از هوش مصنوعی در کسب و کار خود استفاده کنیم؟ لینک مشاهده ویدئو انگلیسی: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr78adfAnuA @Tekrargar_research
👍12🫡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tekrargar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 29,450 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tekrargar” (@tekrargar), 2,463 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tekrargar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.