Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Technical Stark ™

@technical_stark

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

154subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001464438051
TypeChannel
Username@technical_stark
Description🎭 H**king & Programming Stuff 👨‍💻 Career Tips and Learning Roadmaps
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/technical_stark

Growth

153154153.57 August 2026 — 153 subscribers7 August 2026 — 154 subscribers8 August 2026 — 154 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 153–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:46154no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:30154+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:00153first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1045.5%
940.9%
👏14.55%
🔥14.55%
🤩14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2022 to 10 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Feb 2024, 06:26 UTC≈4,740 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Gemini literally said "DO IT YOURSELF" 💀 Even Google Assistant can open YouTube with the same prompt unlike Gemini who acts like he is the boss instead of an assistant Peak Trolling from Google 😭😭

👍2

15 Nov 2023, 15:20 UTC≈6,950 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Top Udemy courses streamable https://youdemy.co/courses/100-days-of-code-the-complete-python-pro-bootcamp-free-download/ https://youdemy.co/courses/flutter-and-dart-the-complete-guide-free-download/ https://youdemy.co/courses/complete-c-unity-game-developer-2d-free/ https://youdemy.co/courses/complete-python-developer-in-2023-zero-to-mastery-free-download/ https://youdemy.co/courses/react-the-complete-guide-incl

1

9 Nov 2023, 07:45 UTC≈1,950 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Reportedly, there's been a leak of the Linkedin Database, with the US Department of Defense asserting responsibility for exposing 2.5 million records. #DarkWeb #dataleakbreach #databreach Follow @technical_stark for more useful stuff like this!

1👏1

31 Oct 2023, 04:12 UTC411 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

10 Platforms to Learn Cybersecurity On 1. Cybrary - Videos,Labs,Practice Exams 2. HacktheBox - Cybersecurity Training platform 3. CyberSecLabs - Training Videos 4. TryHackMe - Hands-on Exercises and Labs 5. Try2Hack - Play a game on real attacks 6. Vulnmachines - Practice on real world scenarios 7. RangeForce - Interactive and hands-on training 8. HackXpert - Free Labs and Training 9. Root Me - 40

👍21

22 Sept 2023, 08:55 UTC377 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Should we create a channel on WhatsApp?

  1. Yup57%
  2. Nope43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2023, 12:02 UTC301 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AIWeb3Metaverse

🤖 Using AI for coding? Proceed with caution! 🚦 While helpful, overuse can lead to gaps. Ask yourself: Am I missing how things work under the hood? 🤔 Are my Question asking skills getting rusty? 🎤 Can I explain my code without AI? 👨‍💻 Can I judge if the output is good? 🧐 Are my core skills growing? 📈 Does AI teach research skills? 🕵️‍♂️ Will I ace interviews without AI? 🎓 There are several communities that ca

4 Aug 2023, 14:15 UTC234 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AIWeb3MetaversePhoto

🧠 New ChatGPT updates to enhance user experience https://the-decoder.com/chatgpt-update-brings-useful-feature-known-from-microsofts-bing-chat/ OpenAI released an epic new feature for ChatGPT, allowing it to show suggested follow-up prompts at the bottom of outputs. They also just tweeted that they’ll be rolling out more updates over the weekend. Here’s what’s coming: Plus users can upload multiple files for analy

20 Jul 2023, 09:08 UTC225 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AIWeb3Metaverse

Prepare for your next job interview with AI: 1: Mock interview with AI interviewai.me 2: Interview questions interviewgpt.ai 3: Interview notes metaview.ai 4: Resume scan accio.springworks.in 5: Job search matchthatroleai.com 6: Apply automatically applyish.com 7: Resume to jobs hnresumetojobs.com For More Content Join @AI_metaverse_web3_learn

1

13 Jul 2023, 06:27 UTC186 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AIWeb3Metaverse

Game-changing secret to Prompt Engineering Here's the secret sauce: 🥣 Step 1️⃣: Assign a role. "You are Sherlock Holmes, a master detective," 🕵️‍♂️ Step 2️⃣: Outline its mission. "Your task is to solve mysteries for crime novels" 📚 Step 3️⃣: Hand over the reins to ChatGPT: "Now, ask me all the questions you need to unravel a compelling mystery that will keep readers on the edge of their seats." 🎢 What you've do

5 Jul 2023, 16:47 UTC≈7,450 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔰LinkedIn Learning Lifetime Premium Step 1: Click on this: Click Here Step 2: Use this Library Card Number: 21901805167321 Step 3: Use this Pin: 280591 Step 4: Click on "Continue" Drop your screenshot after getting access. Happy Learning! Note : Only work's on browser

1👍1🔥1🤩1

2 Jul 2023, 07:28 UTC339 viewsread 8 August 2026

Add all these telegram channels to get a daily dose of latest updates of technology , programming and more https://t.me/addlist/vYHKH6nix-Y2MDA1

3 Feb 2023, 07:39 UTC≈3,800 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

All AI tools 🤯 Telegram: @technical_stark

2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @technical_stark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2023, 08:55 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

Should we create a channel on WhatsApp?

  1. Yup57%
  2. Nope43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2022 to 10 February 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 643,892 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Technical Stark ™” (@technical_stark), 154 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/technical_stark.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.