Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

خرقهٔ تَزویر ( ۳ )

@tazvir3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,115subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001362777260
TypeChannel
Username@tazvir3
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tazvir3

Growth

3,1033,1153,1096 August 2026 — 3,103 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,104 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,109 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,115 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,101–3,117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:153,115+6
9 Aug 2026, 05:023,109+5
6 Aug 2026, 15:203,104+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:373,103first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3238.1%
🔥1821.4%
😱910.7%
🤣67.14%
👍44.76%
😡44.76%
😁33.57%
🥴33.57%
👎22.38%
😨11.19%
🙏11.19%
🤮11.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC675 viewsread 7 August 2026

#مشترکات_عرفانی #نفی_غلو ⚫️ به مناسبت ماه محرّم و ایّام عزاداری بر مصائب امام حسین علیه السّلام 👈🏻 نگاهی به مسأله عزاداری در مکتب عرفان و تصوّف و غُلات، که تابحال در کانال‌های خرقهٔ تَزویر ارائه شده‌ست: t.me/tazvir3/603 t.me/tazvir3/598 t.me/tazvir3/260 t.me/tazvir3/258 t.me/tazvir3/253 t.me/tazvir3/210 t.me/tazvir3/1327 t.me/tazvir3/1330 t.me/tazvir3/1329 t.me/tazvir3/1053 t.me/tazvir3/1951 t.me/tazvir

7 Jul 2026, 11:52 UTC591 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#هیأت_خانقاه_نیست #علمای_شیعه ⚫️ آیت الله شبیری زنجانی حفظه الله: عزاداری برای سیدالشهدا علیه السلام، از عالی‌ترین عبادات است، مراقب باشید روش‌های انحرافی، مانند رفتار صوفیانه وارد عزاداری نشود. @tazvir3

7 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC641 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

#مشترکات_عرفانی #هیأت_خانقاه_نیست #شرع_گریزی 🎥 مراسم منسوب به امام حسین علیه السّلام، به سبک فرقه #قادریه کسنزانی در این نوع مراسمات، خبری از مقتل‌خوانی و حزن و عزا نیست، بلکه با دف و سماع و حرکات صوفیانه برگزار می‌شود، که متأسفانه در بعض هیآت، همین حالات را در بعض عزاداران مشاهده می‌کنیم. 👈🏻 رئیس این فرقه، #عبدالقادر_گیلانی ناصبی‌مسلک است که عاشورا را عید می‌گرفته و "عدي بن مسافر اموي هکاري" که مدافع يزيد و معاوی

5 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC765 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#مشترکات_عرفانی #سلوک_شیطانی #عقل_ستیزی #شرع_گریزی #نفی_غلو 🔥 صوفیِ مدافعِ يزيد و معاویه ملعون ✍🏻 پیشتر به ناصبی‌گری برخی صوفیان مانند #عبدالقادر_گیلانی اشاره شد. یکی دیگر از صوفیان قرن ششم که از شام به مناطق کُردنشین عراق رفت تا تبلیغ بنی‌امیّه را کند و يزيد را تطهیر و تبرئه نماید "عدي بن مسافر اموي هکاري" است. وی از نوادگان "مروان بن حکم" ناصبی خبیث می‌باشد. وی را رئیس يزيدیان عصر خود می‌دانند. سُنّیان معتقدند که

1

20 Jun 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,180 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#مشترکات_عرفانی ⚠️ چرا فرقه بکتاشیه و علویان ترکیه، روز دوازدهم محرّم را شادی می‌کنند؟! 💠 طریقت بکتاشیه و علویان ترکیه که بالغ بر بیست میلیون نفر جمعیت این کشور را تشکیل می‌دهند، با توجه به گرایشی که دارند، از دیرباز مراسم محرّم و صفر را در ترکیه ترویج کرده‌اند. آنها در گذشته به دلیل تعصّبات حاکم بر امپراتوری عثمانی، مراسم عزاداری را پنهانی انجام می‌دادند. یکی از خواسته‌های "دَده‌های علوی" (علما و روحانیت علویان) ب

4🔥3😡3🙏1

26 Feb 2026, 02:22 UTC≈1,780 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#علمای_شیعه #سلوک_شیطانی ✍🏻 آیت الله شبیری زنجانی | ارتباط با صوفیه 📕 رساله عمليه @tazvir3

1

14 Dec 2025, 18:33 UTC≈2,990 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

اولین بار، ماجرای ساختگیِ تشرّف معروف کرخی به محضر امام رضا علیه السّلام را (....) ساخته و پرداخته است که وی به دست آن حضرت مسلمان شد و حاجب ایشان گردید. و روزی در ازدحام شیعیان بر درب منزل آن حضرت، مجروح و کُشته شد!

  1. مولوی18%
  2. عطار نیشابوری34%
  3. ابوعبدالرحمن سُلّمی47%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Dec 2025, 03:39 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tazvir2Poll

شاه‌شجاع به عمادفقیه که در کرمان خانقاه داشت، ارادت نشان می‌داد، و (.....) نیز با وی ارتباط و مشاعره داشت.

  1. عبيد زاکانی24%
  2. سلمان ساوجی13%
  3. حافظ46%
  4. کمال خجندی16%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Dec 2025, 13:51 UTC≈2,150 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#مشترکات_عرفانی #سلوک_شیطانی #عقل_ستیزی #شرع_گریزی 💡بعضی تفاوت‌های مسلمان و صوفی 📗 السيوف البارقة علی هام المتصوّفین المارقة، شیخ ذبیح الله محلاتی @tazvir3

4🤮1

9 Dec 2025, 09:43 UTC≈2,520 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#مشترکات_عرفانی #سلوک_شیطانی #عقل_ستیزی ⚠️ وقتی صد و بیست و چهار هزار پیامبر علیهم السّلام، به هواخواهی یک صوفی می‌آیند، آن‌هم برای یک عصیده ‌(نوعی حلوا) ✅ صد شکر که من مذهب جعفر دارم ✅ با لطف خدا هوای حیدر دارم... 📕 السيوف البارقة علی هامّ المتصوّفین المارقة، مرحوم شیخ ذبیح الله محلاتی @tazvir3

9😁3

9 Dec 2025, 07:30 UTC≈1,470 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

پرسند ز من چه کیش داری* ای بی خبران چه کیش دارم* از شافعی و ابوحنیفه* آئینهٔ خویش پیش دارم* ایشان همه بر طریق جدند* من مذهب جد خویش دارم

  1. سعدی18%
  2. شاه نعمت الله ولی43%
  3. مولوی20%
  4. عطار نیشابوری18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥72👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tazvir3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Dec 2025, 18:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz354 voters

اولین بار، ماجرای ساختگیِ تشرّف معروف کرخی به محضر امام رضا علیه السّلام را (....) ساخته و پرداخته است که وی به دست آن حضرت مسلمان شد و حاجب ایشان گردید. و روزی در ازدحام شیعیان بر درب منزل آن حضرت، مجروح و کُشته شد!

  1. مولوی18%
  2. عطار نیشابوری34%
  3. ابوعبدالرحمن سُلّمی47%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Dec 2025, 03:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz454 voters

شاه‌شجاع به عمادفقیه که در کرمان خانقاه داشت، ارادت نشان می‌داد، و (.....) نیز با وی ارتباط و مشاعره داشت.

  1. عبيد زاکانی24%
  2. سلمان ساوجی13%
  3. حافظ46%
  4. کمال خجندی16%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Dec 2025, 07:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz327 voters

پرسند ز من چه کیش داری* ای بی خبران چه کیش دارم* از شافعی و ابوحنیفه* آئینهٔ خویش پیش دارم* ایشان همه بر طریق جدند* من مذهب جد خویش دارم

  1. سعدی18%
  2. شاه نعمت الله ولی43%
  3. مولوی20%
  4. عطار نیشابوری18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Dec 2025, 20:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz301 voters

نقل است که (......) گفت: از جمله فِرَق عالَم که خلاف کرده‌اند هیچکس پست‌تر از رافضی و خارجی نیامد! زیرا دیگران که خلاف کرده‌اند در حق ( تعالی ) اختلاف داشتند و سخن از او گفتند، و این دو گروه زندگی خلق به باد دادند.

  1. جنید بغدادی19%
  2. ابوبکر شبلی23%
  3. منصور حلّاج17%
  4. بایزید بسطامی26%
  5. مولوی16%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Dec 2025, 08:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz336 voters

کدام صوفی گفت: لِلنَفْس سِرٌّ، و ما ظَهَرَ ذلك السِرُّ على أحدٍ الّا على فرعون حيث قال: أَنَا رَبُّكُمُ الْأَعْلى. يعنى: نفْس را سِرّى است، و ظاهر نشده است آن سِرّ مگر بر فرعون در وقتى كه ادّعای خدائى كرد.

  1. شمس تبریزی17%
  2. سهل بن عبدالله تستری35%
  3. ابن‌عربی39%
  4. ابوبکر شبلی10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Dec 2025, 19:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz402 voters

کدام صوفی معتقد بود که رحمت خداوند متعال شامل ابلیس ملعون هم می‌شود؟!

  1. مولوی49%
  2. سری سقطی6%
  3. جنید بغدادی28%
  4. سهل بن عبدالله تستری17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 7 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 624,968 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خرقهٔ تَزویر ( ۳ )” (@tazvir3), 3,115 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tazvir3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.