Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تزكية الطبيب

Channel

تزكية الطبيب

@tazkiaTabib

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,153subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001418674430
TypeChannel
Username@tazkiaTabib
Descriptionهدف القناة هو تزكية الطبيب المسلم إيمانياً وأخلاقياً، وتنمية وعيه النفسي وتطويره الشخصي بما يعينه على صلاح دينه ودنياه، ويورثه خشية الله تعالى للتواصل: @tzkiah_bot
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held26
On Telegramt.me/tazkiaTabib

Previous handles

@tazkiaTabib was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@tzkiah
held 6 August 20266 August 2026

Growth

13,15113,23713,1946 August 2026 — 13,237 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,237 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,234 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,228 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,224 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,221 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,212 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,204 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,206 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,208 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,198 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,194 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,193 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,188 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,189 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,185 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,182 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,177 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,170 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,167 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,163 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,166 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,160 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,152 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,151 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,153 subscribers13,1536 August 20265 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 30 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,138–13,250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 09:2213,153+2
2 Sept 2026, 06:4413,151-1
1 Sept 2026, 07:4313,152-8
31 Aug 2026, 09:2613,160-6
30 Aug 2026, 12:4313,166+3
29 Aug 2026, 10:1613,163-4
28 Aug 2026, 08:3713,167-3
26 Aug 2026, 03:5413,170-7
25 Aug 2026, 05:1713,177-5
24 Aug 2026, 02:2813,182-3
22 Aug 2026, 10:0613,185-4
21 Aug 2026, 01:4713,189+1
19 Aug 2026, 22:5513,188-5
18 Aug 2026, 20:1813,193-1
17 Aug 2026, 20:1713,194-4
16 Aug 2026, 17:3513,198-10
15 Aug 2026, 00:2313,208+2
13 Aug 2026, 14:0613,206+2
12 Aug 2026, 17:1613,204-8
11 Aug 2026, 14:0713,212first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.39%
avg views ÷ 13,153 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held77 (29 July 20264 September 2026)
Views total65,457
Reactions total1,676
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
384
Videos
31
Links
266

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,552 reactions across 77 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,32791.2%
😢993.88%
💔391.53%
👍170.666%
💘150.588%
🍓130.509%
🔥100.392%
👌80.313%
😭70.274%
🫡70.274%
🥰40.157%
🌚30.118%
😍20.078%
👏10.039%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,552 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 77 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tazkiaTabib. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 06:20 UTC413 views19 reactionsread 5 September 2026

•• ما أكثر ما تجد عند طلاب العلم والباحثين (مسودة كتاب أو مؤلف) لم يتجاوز تقسيم الموضوع والعناصر، وبعض الشواهد والنصوص والملاحظات المهمة، وتسري عليه السنون، تزاور الشمس عن يمينه وشماله.. ولم ير النور بعد، ولا أظنه سيراها.. طالما أن فضول النوم، وفضول الطعام والشراب، وفضول الترفيه، وفضول الخلطة، وفضول الحديث والكلام، وفضول النظر؛ قد استكملت أوقاتها وأخذت نصيبها غير منقوص. وهكذا تجد في عزم كثير من الناس شُعَبًا من الخي

😢154

3 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC494 views13 reactionsread 5 September 2026

♦️♦️نذكركم بقراءة تفسير السعدي♦️♦️ غدا الجمعة في تمام الساعة العاشرة مساء بتوقيت مكة والقاهرة ان شاء الله على قناة مرافئ الوحي وسنبدأ بسورة الحجرات بمشيئة الله تعالى🌷🌷 https://t.me/Wa7iee

12💘1

3 Sept 2026, 08:51 UTC576 views28 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @Wa7iee

سمعت أحد الدعاة الأفاضل ذكر في محاضرة له: أتحدى أي شخص يأتي لي بكتاب يُقرأ بدون فهم غير القرآن! كثير من المسلمين يقرؤن القرآن،بل ويحفظونه،لكنهم يظلمون ويخونون ويكذبون والسبب :لأنهم لم يفهموا القران ولم يتدبروه ! هل أخذت على نفسك قرار السعي لفهم القران؟!

😢199

2 Sept 2026, 17:13 UTC938 views12 reactionsread 5 September 2026

القناة تابعة لنا وسيقوم على قراءة مجالس التفسير مجموعة من زملائكم الاطباء❤️ https://t.me/Wa7iee رابط القناة فضلاً شاركوا القناة بين زملائكم،ففهم القران وتدبره هو مشروع عظيم يحتاج كثير من البذل والجهد،ولا يسع المسلم جهل معاني وتفسير السور التي سنأخذها في المجالس ان شاء الله 🌷

11👍1

2 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC636 views21 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @Wa7iee

سنبدأ بعون الله تعالى مجالس تفسير أسبوعية،تبدأ من طوال المفصل نتدارس فيها كتاب الله تعالى من خلال تفسير السعدي رحمه الله؛ ذلك التفسير السهل الميسّر، الواضح العبارة، الذي يجمع بين بيان معاني الآيات والهداية المستفادة منها، مما يجعله مناسبًا للراغبين في تدبّر القرآن وفهمه والعمل به، سواء كانوا من المبتدئين أو ممن لديهم قدر من العلم. 🗓 كل يوم جمعة ⏰ سيتم طرح أوقات مقترحة للتصويت، واختيار الوقت الذي يناسب معظم المشاركين

19😍2

1 Sept 2026, 21:03 UTC≈1,100 views60 reactionsread 5 September 2026

لا تتزوجوا الفسدة من أجل أن تصلحوهم فيفسدوكم فقد تزوَّج عمران بن حطان امرأة جميلة من الخوارج ،وقال أنه سيردّها لأهل السنة ،فصار هو من زعماء الخوارج ". [سير أعلام النبلاء ]

39😢21

31 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,050 views47 reactionsread 5 September 2026

لم أكن أمتلك في السابق معيارًا واضحًا في اختيار من حولي من الناس، فمرةً يغريني في الإنسان سعة علمه واطلاعه، وتارةً يغريني ذكاؤه وسرعة بداهته، وكرةً فصاحته وحسن حديثه، وطورًا اجتهاده وتجلّده في العمل، وغير ذلك من المعايير التي تجعلك تميل للاقتراب منه والعمل معه. لكن حين عدتُ إلى القرآن وجدت المعيار واضحًا، وهو معيار الصدق {يا أيها الذين آمنوا اتقوا الله وكونوا مع الصادقين}. تساءلت: ما الفئات الأخرى التي أمرنا الله أ

47

31 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC953 views29 reactionsread 5 September 2026

عن أبي موسى الأشعري رضي الله عنه أن النبي ﷺ كان إذا خاف قومًا قال:- «اللهم إنا نجعلك في نحورهم، ونعوذ بك من شرورهم» [رواه أبو داود]

29

29 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,080 views29 reactionsread 5 September 2026

عن أَبِي ذرٍّ جُنْدَبِ بنِ جُنَادَةَ رضي الله عنه قَالَ: قُلْتُ يَا رسولَ اللَّه، أيُّ الأعْمالِ أفْضَلُ؟ قَالَ: الإِيمانُ بِاللَّهِ، وَالجِهَادُ فِي سَبِيلِهِ قُلْتُ: أيُّ الرِّقَابِ أفْضَلُ؟ قَالَ: أنْفَسُهَا عِنْد أهْلِهَا، وأكثَرُهَا ثَمَناً. قُلْتُ: فَإِنْ لَمْ أفْعلْ؟ قَالَ: تُعينُ صَانِعاً أوْ تَصْنَعُ لأخْرَقَ قُلْتُ: يَا رَسُول اللَّه أرَأيتَ إنْ ضَعُفْتُ عَنْ بَعْضِ الْعملِ؟ قَالَ: تَكُفُّ شَرَّكَ عَن النّ

29

29 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,090 views10 reactionsread 5 September 2026

https://youtu.be/mrwKWnqT818?si=tBu3VNyatCawGYY7 مقطع مميز عن عبودية الاستغفار للشيخ عبد الله العجيري

10

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @tazkiaTabib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@tazkiaTabib edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فِقْهُ الطَّبِيب"ما لا يسَعُ المسلم الطبيب جهله"
@fiqh_altabib · 95,941
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
مشروع ضاكتور
@Mashrou3_Dactoor · 39,391
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
PostGraduate 🎓| MW
@PostGrad_Med · 40,563
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
قناة أسراوي في العيادة 📝
@asrawyfel3yadachannel · 32,068
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
Medicine Way | MW
@Medicine_Way2 · 127,235
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
Dr.YoussefMohsen
@dryoussefmohsen · 32,395
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تزكية الطبيب” (@tazkiaTabib), 13,153 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tazkiaTabib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.