11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,097–23,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 19:05
23,107
-6
16 Aug 2026, 16:24
23,113
-18
14 Aug 2026, 23:44
23,131
-6
13 Aug 2026, 12:59
23,137
-5
12 Aug 2026, 13:05
23,142
-5
11 Aug 2026, 11:44
23,147
-5
10 Aug 2026, 10:32
23,152
-8
9 Aug 2026, 11:32
23,160
-8
8 Aug 2026, 08:25
23,168
-4
7 Aug 2026, 06:10
23,172
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:31
23,172
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.86%
avg views ÷ 23,107 subscribers
Avg views / post
891
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.382%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
52 (6 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
42,775
Reactions total
126
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18m 08s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
126 reactions across 31 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
71
56.3%
😭
17
13.5%
👏
11
8.73%
💔
10
7.94%
🤔
4
3.17%
😢
3
2.38%
🙏
3
2.38%
🤬
3
2.38%
🎉
2
1.59%
😨
1
0.794%
🫡
1
0.794%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.92%
1 of 52 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
760
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
924
over 47 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJ1n4gR
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
😱Школьница с ножом напала на двух сестёр в Уфе — одна из девочек в крайне тяжёлом состоянии
😭В Уфе 16-летняя школьница напала с ножом на двух сестёр — 9 и 16 лет. Обеих девочек экстренно госпитализировали и прооперировали. По данным Baza, младшая находится в тяжёлом, но стабильном состоянии, старшая — в крайне тяжёлом.
Нападение произошло в микрорайоне Зелёная Роща. Свидетелем стал 10-летний брат девочек — ему удал…
🎥🎥🎥🎥🎥🔥 Хлопок, выбивший окна: что случилось на Чистопольской в Казани. БПЛА?!
🚨Утро началось с громкого хлопка. Сегодня около 04:12 жители многоквартирного дома № 20А по улице Чистопольская проснулись от мощного звука. По их словам, ударной волной в жилом доме выбило стёкла.
🏢 Причина — техника, а не стихия и не БПЛА. ГУ МЧС России по Республике Татарстан установило источник происшествия. В замкнутом пространстве п…
😱🚒Небо покрылось едким дымом в Коледино после атаки БПЛА по складу Wildberries
Это крупнейший склад ВБ в Московской области. Пострадавших там нет, сотрудников вовремя вывели, пишут СМИ
#СВО #Россия #БПЛА #пожары #Вайлдберриз #товары
📲MAX, тут новости без ограничений📲✅
⚠️Четверо суток в Казани ищут мать двоих детей
Еще 11 августа 34 летняя Алия ушла из дома в Кировском районе и до сих пор не вернулась. Последний раз девушку видели в районе остановки Фрунзе. Волонтеры обзвонили и обошли больницы отделы полиции, СИЗО и морги, но все безрезультатно.
Дома Алию ждут дети. Полиция, со слов волонтеров, сообщает, якобы не хватает кадров даже элементарно посмотреть видео с камер наблюден…
🏡Дом 160м2
Участок 10 соток
Баня, тёплая терраса и кирпичная зона барбекю 🍖
‼️Выгода 500 тыс рублей ✔️
✅ Все вопросы @ilnaz_spec_v_nedvige ✍️
📞 8 (906) 112-15-68
Часто говорят, что среди тюркских языков самые непонятные — саха-якутский и чувашский. И действительно, якутскую речь татарину понять практически невозможно. Будто наши языки вовсе не родственные. Но если посмотреть на корни совершенно непохожих слов, родство становится заметным.
Объясню на двух примерах.
В Якутской филармонии я увидел на стене почётную грамоту. На якутском написано Махтал. По-татарски — Рәхмәт хат…
✅✅✅✅✅ 🚨Убежище на бумаге: активисты в Казани требуют от Минниханова спуститься под землю
📍Активисты из Казани направили открытое приглашение главе республики Рустаму Минниханову. Они предлагают ему лично посетить городские укрытия, состояние которых вызывает серьёзные вопросы у жителей.
🗣️Поводом для инициативы послужило недавнее заявление руководителя региона. Он отметил, что в случае необходимости каждый должен в…
🪖 Россия не пойдёт на заморозку конфликта по линии фронта
ℹ️Лавров объяснил, что это перечеркнёт подвиг дедов и прадедов, победивших нацизм.
Речь идёт о нашей ответственности за тысячелетнюю историю российского государства.
заявил он.
"Если мы сейчас вдруг остановились бы на линии соприкосновения, мы, по сути дела, позволили бы перечеркнуть подвиг наших дедов и прадедов, которые победили нацизм. Это невозможно рас…
❗️После трагедии в Нижнекамске Минниханов призвал татарстанцев спускаться в укрытия во время атак БПЛА и ракетной опасности
❕Даже если это доставляет неудобства:
«Если бы люди спустились в укрытия, в Нижнекамске таких потерь бы не было. Упрощать не надо. Есть беспилотная опасность, значит, мы должны следовать руководству, которое есть. Особенно с детьми. Это может быть не совсем комфортно, удобно, но жизнь человек…
😱🔥Импортозамещение с огоньком. В Подмосковье на зарядке сгорел китайский внедорожник
🚙 Чудо инженерии из Поднебесной — Lixiang L6 стоимостью более $60 тысяч — практически полностью выгорело. Огонь уничтожил салон и подкапотное пространство, в машине выбило стёкла.
ℹ️Предварительная причина — короткое замыкание. Очевидцы также слышали звуки взрывов.
🚘Автомобиль купили у официального дилера всего около 10 месяцев на…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @tatartoday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tatartoday edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 94,179 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tatartoday named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ems_fit_kazan named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@ems_fitness_kzn named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТАТАР ТУДЕЙ | TATAR TODAY | ТАТАРЫ | Татарстан | Казань | Россия” (@tatartoday), 23,107 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tatartoday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
