Posted without readable text

Channel
Казань ЧП
@kazan_chp116
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,031subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001181578377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kazan_chp116 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kazan_chp116 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 12,031 | -7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 12,038 | +5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 12,033 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 12,031 | -12 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 12,043 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 12,044 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 12,048 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:04 | 12,051 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:07 | 12,052 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 12,058 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 12,056 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 12,057 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 12,058 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 12,059 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 12,063 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 12,071 | +11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 12,060 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 12,052 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 12,051 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 12,049 | first reading |
Engagement
300 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.52%
- avg views ÷ 12,031 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 424
- 102 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.375%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 102
- of 300 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 300 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 43,252 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 45m 56s
- Average length
- 42s
Measured directly from 65 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
171 reactions across 69 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 12.9% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 8.19% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 7.60% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 7.02% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 5.85% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 5.85% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 5.26% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 2.92% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.34% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.75% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.75% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.17% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.585% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 300 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 300 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😐 «Сикс-севен», «БПЛА», «Колобок», «бензин» и «блокировка» вошли в список «Слова года». Также в него добавили «белые списки», «выгорание», «отмена».
Posted without readable text
⛷️Савелия Коростелева и Дарью Непряеву, выступающих от Татарстана, допустили к международным соревнованиям под эгидой FIS. Они стали первыми россиянами с 2022 года, которые появятся на чемпионатах. Но под нейтральным статусом.
🕷️В сентябре в Татарстане ожидается вторая волна активности клещей По словам врачей, осенью активизируются нимфы — молодые особи, которые почти незаметны на коже. Их укус не чувствуется, поэтому люди часто не замечают опасности.
🪙 Wildberries, Ozon и «Яндекс Маркет» запустили оплату цифровыми рублями — опция доступна при оформлении заказов.
❤1
❗️ «Это чушь собачья», — Путин про слухи о новой волне мобилизации в России после выборов.
❤️🩹 В Казани мужчина спас перепуганного котенка на дороге и забрал его к себе — сейчас питомец подрос и живет свою лучшую жизнь в любящей семье. Видео: albin_ka25
🔥2
😳 Пакеты с воздухом из Москвы продает житель Казани Продавец предлагает «вдохнуть воздух самой Москвы, не выходя из дома». По его словам, у него остался последний пакет, поэтому он снизил цену до 200 рублей.
😁1
Posted without readable text
🇦🇪 Татарстан организует лагерь для детей в ОАЭ — на это выделят 12,3 млн рублей Больше всего потратят на перелеты — более 5,6 млн рублей. Смена пройдет в Абу-Даби с 27 октября по 4 ноября: из республики поедут почти 70 детей, а общая делегация составит около 80 человек.
🍼 «Даем демографический рекорд в Казани!» — Ильсур Метшин На линейке в лицее №170 мэр Казани призвал родителей «не останавливаться» — для этого в городе будут строить новые детские сады и школы.
Showing the 12 most recent of 300 posts we hold for @kazan_chp116. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@novosti_tatarstana116 · 24,057
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
@info_tatar · 38,422
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
@city16kazan · 25,481
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@zakatki_nazimu · 21,708
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
@SHOCKkzn · 82,623
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@tatarstan_republic · 55,901
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@kzn_xz · 22,658
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
@tatartoday · 22,862
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
@podslukzn · 30,921
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Казань ЧП” (@kazan_chp116), 12,031 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kazan_chp116.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.