تنهاتر از یک برگ: تأملاتی در فلسفه و علم pinned a photo

Channel
تنهاتر از یک برگ: تأملاتی در فلسفه و علم
@tanhaatarazyekbarg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,450subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001382371869 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tanhaatarazyekbarg |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tanhaatarazyekbarg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 3,450 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 3,451 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 3,453 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 3,452 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 3,455 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 3,455 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.8%
- avg views ÷ 3,450 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 374
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.15%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,858 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 29 | 39.7% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 28.8% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 11.0% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 9.59% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 8.22% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔻اطلاعات بیشتر درباره این دوره: https://t.me/tanhaatarazyekbarg/1511
تنهاتر از یک برگ: تأملاتی در فلسفه و علم pinned a photo
🔻 مطالعه متن در اینستاگرام از طریق لینک زیر: https://www.instagram.com/p/DbgVXyVF8pd/?igsh=MWxmazBuejRocDgwNQ==
👎1
برچسبها در پایان این مسیر وارد میشوند. «حکومتی»، «معاند»، «پروژه»، «خائن»، «کاسب» و «وطنفروش» معمولاً توضیح نمیدهند فرد دقیقاً چه کرده است. کار اصلی آنها تعیین جای او در نقشه سیاسی است. پس از نصب برچسب، رفتارهای متفاوت در یکدیگر حل میشوند. کارمند عادی یک نهاد، مروج آگاه تبلیغات، بهرهمند از رانت و کسی که در سرکوب مشارکت کرده، ممکن است همگی با یک نام خوانده شوند. این فشردگی زبانی داوری را آسان میکند، اما بهایش …
👍2👎1
🛎️یادداشت امروز 🔻وقتی یک رفتار به آزمون هویت تبدیل میشود! تآملی درباره فضای دوقطبی موجود میشود! ✍️ محمدرضا واعظ، محقق فلسفه در دانشگاه بن آلمان در بُرههای از زمان در فضای فارسی زبان رسانههای اجتماعی زندگی میکنیم که بعضا عمر یک داوری از خود واقعه بیشتر است. برای مثال٬ مراسم تمام شده، کنسرت حتی برگزار نشده، مصاحبه به پایان رسیده یا عکسی چندثانیهای از صفحهها کنار رفته است، اما حکمی که از آن ساختهایم همچنان می…
👍2
در مورد عادل فردوسیپور، آرشیو گذشتهی او وارد میدان شد. پس از انتقاد او از امیر قلعهنویی، رسانههای نزدیک به حکومت او را متهم به دوقطبیسازی کردند. همزمان، گروهی از مخالفان جمهوری اسلامی، سابقه طولانی کار او در صداوسیما، سخنانش درباره محسن حججی، و سکوتهای گذشتهاش را کنار هم گذاشتند تا ثابت کنند اساساً یکی از چهرههای همان حکومت بوده است. مراجعه به گذشته او کاملاً مربوط و موجه است. کسی که سالها تریبون عمومی داشت…
👍2👎1
🔻سکوت، همیشه یک معنا ندارد! از بیرون، همه سکوتها شبیه یکدیگرند، اما در درون آدمها یکسان نیستند. کسی ممکن است از ترس، ناامنی، نگرانی برای خانواده یا بیم از دست دادن شغل و موقعیتش خاموش بماند. دیگری شاید اساساً با آنچه رخ داده مخالفتی نداشته باشد و یا به عبارتی موافق وضع موجود باشد. ما معمولاً به این بخش پنهان زندگی افراد دسترسی نداریم و نمیتوانیم تنها از سکوتشان، درباره نیت یا منش آنها حکم قطعی صادر کنیم. با این …
👍5❤2👎2
🔻سکوت، همیشه یک معنا ندارد! ✅ مطالعه کپشن: https://t.me/tanhaatarazyekbarg/1514
👍1
https://t.me/tanhaatarazyekbarg/1511
📣 آغاز ثبتنام دورهٔ آموزشی آنلاین «بحثهایی در فلسفهٔ هوش مصنوعی (اعتماد، مسئولیت و توضیحپذیری)» 👤 استاد: دکتر محمدرضا واعظ شهرستانی 🗓 ساعت ۱۸ تا ۱۹:۳۰ (مجموعاً هشت جلسه) 🟢 معرفی دوره: وقتی از یک سامانهٔ هوش مصنوعی پاسخ یا پیشنهادی میگیریم، ممکن است به نتیجهٔ آن اعتماد کنیم، بیآنکه بدانیم واقعاً شایستهٔ اعتماد است یا نه. این پرسش زمانی جدی تر میشود که خروجی آن بر حقوق، فرصتها، منافع یا حتی رفاه ما اثرگذ…
این دوره آموزشی با هزینه ثبتنام بسیار مناسب توسط نطقیات ارائه شده است.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tanhaatarazyekbarg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 100,660 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Sedanet · 22,0087 postsآکادمی فلسفه و هنر مارزوک
@marzockacademy · 16,0545 postsسایهروشنِ زندگی | امید کشمیری
@Omidkeshmiri · 6862 postsموسسه فرهنگی مطالعاتی پیدایش
@rooyeshedigar · 7492 postsدرباره یارا
@yara_propsal · 612 posts🦋پرورشِ حس🦋
@sense_edu · 7641 postیارا: مرکز پیشبرد فلسفه برای کودکان و جوانان(ICAPCY)
@yarabookhouse · 4901 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تنهاتر از یک برگ: تأملاتی در فلسفه و علم” (@tanhaatarazyekbarg), 3,450 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanhaatarazyekbarg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.