Channel
@szgkbang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,161subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001574976061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szgkbang |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szgkbang |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 8,161 | +15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 8,146 | -81 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 8,227 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 8,236 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (4 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,061 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧩榜单番号 0302-1144 南山 月月 抓龙筋 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉南山 👉抓龙筋 👉毒龙 👉口爆 👉SM ✅已验证，放心出击 QQ：3666506050 与你：20416691k4cp72 私聊： @linken2012 双向机器人: @linken2012bot 频道： https://t.me/mmjayou 频道: https://t.me/lmzzml777 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 112-3199994 #95口爆(海选 会所)😂😀😀😀 📱📱📱📱口爆SPA会所覆盖全深圳区（无套口出）📱📱📱📱 🐨#罗湖 🐨#福田 🐨#宝安 🐨#龙岗 🐨#南山🐨 #龙华 数30+位妹妹上班，御姐，巨乳，萝莉，小骚货各种类型都有，配合度高，主动开放热情，到点海选不满意可换到满意为止听话乖巧 😛套餐:预约价538-598（全裸口一次）60分钟 😝套餐:预约价568-658（全裸口一手一）70分钟 😜套餐:预约价800-888（全裸魔棒口2次）80分钟 🤪套餐:预约价 1000-1180（双飞或加钟全裸口出2次） 😀😀😀😀组团优惠更多（ 30-150 ） 😀😀😀😀 📱📱#94丝足（主打00后嫩妹）📱📱 😀😀丝足会所覆盖全深圳区域 😀😀 😀😀😀😀服务内容😀😀😀😀 🐻🐻前段【20分钟】：特色变装躺采，头疗放松，十指弹琴，舌尖漫游，蛇绕全身，耳语调情 🐻🐻中段【30分钟…
🧩榜单番号 509-1155 琪琪 宝安 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 👉巨乳D🐻 👉69 👉环保口爆♻️ 👉舌吻🐍 👉毒龙🐲 👉双飞👯♀️ 399/499 环保♻️998 私聊 @w2010111 双向机器人 @w2010111bot 频道: https://t.me/wql2010111 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
❤1
🧩榜单番号 0806-4453 宝安 晓晓 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 👉69 👉毒龙 👉舌吻🐍 👉巨乳D🐻 👉口爆 👉双飞 ✅个人私约已验证，放心出击 92/400 95/500 95双飞/888 私聊： @xiao168999 频道: https://t.me/xiao93888 机器人: @xiaoxiaolove1314_bot 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 601-1144 宝安 彤彤 课费 400✈️ 500口爆♻️ 丝袜JK,制服诱惑 私聊 @TT68881 双向机器人 @batt656bot 频道 https://t.me/TT68885 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 西乡 固戍 👉69 👉巨乳D🐻 👉毒龙 👉口爆 ✅个人私约已验证，放心出击 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
深圳全区 95口爆《金牌🥇会所》 全裸～全裸～全裸～可魔棒～可操盘 全区#95价格：568（👄1👋1）🔥 👯双飞👯价格：1100（👄2）🔥 全区#96 价格：800 （👄2） 全区#94价格：398~468（可臀出或🐻出） 客服： @LH666888C（可预约） 双向： @LH666888CBOT 群聊: https://t.me/TH6668888A 频道: https://t.me/TH666888C 微信：Xx1114315 QQ： 3675548640 9️⃣4️⃣会所👉 https://t.me/HY888666V 9️⃣4️⃣会所👉 https://t.me/HJ888666V ⚠️没报预约号一律按正规按摩处理⚠️ 🧍♀️挑选佳丽🧍♀️：到店里去选，不满意可以换，选到满意为止🤝🤝
🧩榜单番号 0302-1153 南山林林抓龙筋（大冲新城花园） A套餐 60分钟/468 B套餐 90分钟/698 C套餐 120分钟/888 D套餐 90分钟/999 E套餐 120分钟/1299 SM女王调教 90分钟/899 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉南山 👉抓龙筋 👉口爆 👉SM ✅已验证，放心出击 qq: 3505331286 私信 @linzi062004 双向机器人 @linzi062004bot 安卓频道 https://t.me/linzi0620004 苹果频道 https://t.me/dfgas4 点击下面链接查看手法视频(永不失联） https://t.me/gohome?start=L-Cjfo1q 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @szgkbang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 266,485 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@szgkbang named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深莞可口爆资源” (@szgkbang), 8,161 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szgkbang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.