Channel
@lsjddwo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14,894subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001887654167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lsjddwo |
| Description | 上榜联系： @CN3456 私聊不了联系双向机器人： @CN4567BOT 更多其他资源 https://t.me/LM8969 深圳学生会交流群 https://t.me/SZXSH8 一键快速进深圳所有群 https://t.me/addlist/jxLTSzufnjIwNDE1 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lsjddwo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 14,894 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 14,901 | +21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 14,880 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 14,883 | +10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 14,873 | -59 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 14,932 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 14,945 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (24 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,288 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🧩榜单番号 0809-3457 宝安小亦半裸抓龙筋 项目一 ： 499/60分钟 项目二： 699/80分钟 项目三： 799/100分钟 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 👉抓龙筋 ✅已验证，放心出击 私信 @xiaoyi952766 频道 https://t.me/xiaoyi9293 双向机器人 @xiaoyi9293bot 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 0302-31884 龙岗瑶瑶抓龙筋 项目一：599元60分钟 项目二：699元70分钟 项目二：799元80分钟 上🚪899起 个人工作室 干净卫生 停车方便 私聊 @yaoyao138 频道 https://t.me/+6VU9s9hBZr8xYmRl 双向机器人：@bobazlj_bot QQ：3517844344 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 0806-4453 宝安 晓晓 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 👉69 👉毒龙 👉舌吻🐍 👉巨乳D🐻 👉口爆 👉双飞 ✅个人私约已验证，放心出击 92/400 95/500 95双飞/888 私聊： @xiao168999 频道: https://t.me/xiao93888 机器人: @xiaoxiaolove1314_bot 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 601-1144 宝安 彤彤 课费 400✈️ 500口爆♻️ 丝袜JK,制服诱惑 私聊 @TT68881 双向机器人 @batt656bot 频道 https://t.me/TT68885 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 西乡 固戍 👉69 👉巨乳D🐻 👉毒龙 👉口爆 ✅个人私约已验证，放心出击 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 403-5664 福田 念念 SPA抓龙筋🐉🐉🐉 #深圳按摩 #福田按摩 #深圳丝足诱惑👠 #深圳SPA抓龙筋 #深圳前列腺保养 电话：135-5689-0245 威信: niannian0225me QQ: 3827806930 频道: https://t.me/zhualongjin0225 TG: @niannian02251 私聊不了请联系双向机器人: @niannian02251bot 更多: 🔥深圳修车资源榜 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利
🧩榜单番号 403-4575 龙岗吉祥雨轩工作室（吉祥万科广场） 身高 165CM 体重 52KG 罩杯40E 抓龙筋项目表 套餐A 499 /70分钟 调情探索男性快感+抓龙筋脱敏术🐲 +性感甜蜜柔式调情+三重三落+延迟边控+JJ增长训练+前列腺高潮+释放 套餐B 699/90分钟 高端情趣半裸+酥麻销魂指尖鼻吸调情+抓龙筋脱敏术🐲+0距离女友舌尖漫游+臀臀欲动+延迟边控+前列腺高潮+龟责丝足多重激情释放+N个情趣套装 本人是普拉提健身教练，私人工作室，本人比照片好看，如有假图双倍报销车费 禁皮肤病，禁低素质，禁嘴炮，禁喝酒 营业时间8：00———23：00 以上🈚️95，98 于你 yuxuan88 qq 3908431140 私信 @yqiyaqi 频道 https://t.me/lgmoon 双向机器人 @szyxzljbot 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @lsjddwo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 239,172 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lsjddwo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深莞私约资源榜” (@lsjddwo), 14,894 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lsjddwo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.