Channel
@banhche
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,274subscribers
-131 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001871190860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @banhche |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/banhche |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 10,274 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 10,286 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 10,293 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 10,298 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 10,310 | -83 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 10,393 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 10,405 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 914 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😇 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧩榜单番号 0812-3366 【深圳 惠州 东莞 佛山 广州】95-96均有分店 海选模式 莞式服务 至尊享受 深圳九四丝足水会频道 https://t.me/SzSwK1295/7505 私密莞式 更有多位 学生妹 持续出勤 尊重每位客户，提供个性化服务 顶尖颜值 专业服务 根据需求可定制专属的个性服务，更多姿势服务待哥哥发掘 时间不到服务不停 可加钟可双飞 主打颜值 服务 环境 安全为一体的高端私密男士会所 合作会所每天都有补充颜值高、活好的年轻技师 机器人：@dsfsdsabot QQ在线客服：3809275809 在线客服：@qgsnkyd5_6 深圳区#95-#96频道地址 https://t.me/szgz949596/82 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 0811-5645 深圳｜🔥TOP级私享抓龙筋体验 前列腺高潮体验过没？非常爽！！！ 半裸调情+深度脱敏不限次嗨放SPA，体验不一样的爽感，爽到灵魂出窍，长达5-10分钟 沉浸式放松 · 全程深度释放节奏掌控张弛有度，感官逐步放大，让你在极致舒适中不断突破临界点，一次体验，多重感受重新定义你的放松方式。 玩法十足满足你所有的幻想。不追短期热度，只求长期价值 QQ：2960749896 预约☎️：@szliaoyuSPA 频道：https://t.me/szlhrispa 机器人 : @szliaoyubot 初探: 699/80分钟 沉浸: 998/100分钟 位置：#深圳南山 #福田 #罗湖 #宝安 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 0809-3457 宝安小亦半裸抓龙筋 项目一 ： 499/60分钟 项目二： 699/80分钟 项目三： 799/100分钟 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 👉抓龙筋 ✅已验证，放心出击 私信 @xiaoyi952766 频道 https://t.me/xiaoyi9293 双向机器人 @xiaoyi9293bot 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 112-3199994 #95口爆(海选 会所)😂😀😀😀 📱📱📱📱口爆SPA会所覆盖全深圳区（无套口出）📱📱📱📱 🐨#罗湖 🐨#福田 🐨#宝安 🐨#龙岗 🐨#南山🐨 #龙华 数30+位妹妹上班，御姐，巨乳，萝莉，小骚货各种类型都有，配合度高，主动开放热情，到点海选不满意可换到满意为止听话乖巧 😛套餐:预约价538-598（全裸口一次）60分钟 😝套餐:预约价568-658（全裸口一手一）70分钟 😜套餐:预约价800-888（全裸魔棒口2次）80分钟 🤪套餐:预约价 1000-1180（双飞或加钟全裸口出2次） 😀😀😀😀组团优惠更多（ 30-150 ） 😀😀😀😀 📱📱#94丝足（主打00后嫩妹）📱📱 😀😀丝足会所覆盖全深圳区域 😀😀 😀😀😀😀服务内容😀😀😀😀 🐻🐻前段【20分钟】：特色变装躺采，头疗放松，十指弹琴，舌尖漫游，蛇绕全身，耳语调情 🐻🐻中段【30分钟…
🧩榜单番号 0807-3366 深圳全区94-95-96-98会所SAP #龙华 #罗湖 #宝安 #福田 #南山 #龙岗 #光明 #盐田 #坪山 #南山 #95-96口爆《金牌🥇会所》 95价格:568-598各区价格不同 96价格:788-850各区价格不同 #94全区精品店 60分钟 帝王视角任君摆弄姿势 妹妹听话懂配合 价格399-499各地区价格不同 预约QQ:2754796170（QQ不聊项目，只发位置，报预约号） 双向: @szjfnj0bot 私聊: @wwff9495 频道: https://t.me/fvjbvv7 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
😇1
🧩榜单番号 509-1155 琪琪 宝安 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 👉巨乳D🐻 👉69 👉环保口爆♻️ 👉舌吻🐍 👉毒龙🐲 👉双飞👯♀️ 399/499 环保♻️998 私聊 @w2010111 双向机器人 @w2010111bot 频道: https://t.me/wql2010111 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 601-1144 宝安 彤彤 课费 400✈️ 500口爆♻️ 丝袜JK,制服诱惑 私聊 @TT68881 双向机器人 @batt656bot 频道 https://t.me/TT68885 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 西乡 固戍 👉69 👉巨乳D🐻 👉毒龙 👉口爆 ✅个人私约已验证，放心出击 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
🧩榜单番号 0804-1144 晨晨 宝安 92课费 399元 95课费499元 95双飞998元 标签（点蓝字查看更多）： 👉宝安 👉69 👉巨乳D🐻 👉毒龙 👉舌吻🐍 👉双飞 私聊: @hcy2020 双向机器人: @hcy2020bot 频道: https://t.me/hcy20201 ✅个人私约已验证，放心出击 更多: 🌎深圳修车资源导航 资源群：🍀深圳学生会 一键快速进深圳所有群 🔍更多资源福利 👉点我永不失联
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @banhche. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 264,166 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@banhche named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“宝安&长安&光明❤️修车资源” (@banhche), 10,274 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/banhche.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.