Channel
@syluetNotes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
272subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002538663481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @syluetNotes |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/syluetNotes |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 272 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 275 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 274 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 274 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
169 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 63 | 37.3% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 26.0% | |
| 💯 | 25 | 14.8% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 8.88% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 6.51% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.592% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.592% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.592% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вообще, хоть кейс приятный вышел, но я получил аллоки примерно в 4 раза меньше, чем хотел. В кракенах проходка низкая, а легион чисто по-приколу мейн побрил хотя 80%+ заявок зафилили. Ну и очевидно ожиданий здесь на 3х даже близко не было, так что здесь скорее QUID тима легенды. Чисто напоминалка вам, что хоть летнее время и впадло чем-либо заниматься. Но левым глазом всё же на рынок лучше поглядывать. Сейчас почти…
💯5
Есть выжившие? Там сквид дал немного веру в криптовалюты. Надеюсь кто-то тоже депнул, а то до поста у меня руки не дошли. P.S. Сейл на легионе 3 икса дал, Бинанс альфа + Апбит дао кормят @syluetNotes
❤5🔥2
Jurassic мини-апдейт по лудке В целом всё вышло в границах ожиданий, как и писал в посте. Чистыми +2% к стеку за 5 дней холда 💰 Клейм и забрать стейблы здесь: https://www.futard.io/launch/F5A6BchpqGbbBABtgRycJZGkqy2i5AgVJP1VKW5AGotG Слить можно на JUP: https://jup.ag/swap?sell=4K1m7gAMDKzrxQn68yuZAd767w57Fw7Ykw69dG3umeta Свои токены пока оставил мунбегом. Но в любом случае, учитывая рынок и относильно небольшие р…
❤8
Наебал я вас, братья Но видимо природа настолько очистилась, что за фарос уже 200 поинтов дают проходку. Эти типы кстати 700кк FDV @syluetNotes
Но вообще, чет посерчил 200 баллов = либо нищий дроп по 20 баксов, либо проект миллиардник. По ласт стате скорее второе, ибо под нищие дропы бинанс обычно боксы делает Может быть ещё MegaETH: - редкий спот листинг бинанса без альфы - вышли 14 дней назад - сейчас лои, возможно под них и укатывались Так что по биллионсу 90%, что отмена. Но если и правда будет так, и они каким-то образом выкупят $15кк у альфа боярей …
Будет угарно, если это BILLIONS второй дроп И чисто бинанс их выебет на схематоз пампе и дальше down-only Но я в душе не ебу, какой другой проект может быть с проходкой 200 поинтов, при авераге 230-240 @syluetNotes
🤔2
Кстати у кого AZTEC остался, сегодня анонсировали листинги корейских бирж и дали немного старых памп-вайбов. Торгуемся в +15% к клиринговой цене эфира. К стейблам зависит от ТВХ вашей, но БУ/плюс для многих тоже. Слить здесь можно: https://app.uniswap.org/explore/tokens/ethereum/0xa27ec0006e59f245217ff08cd52a7e8b169e62d2 Я часть на ТГЕ по 0.23 закрыл, часть лью вот лесенкой по текущим по мере роста. Назвать адеква…
❤6😁2
63% челов, вы чё на приколе? Типо альтсезона не будет?... 37% гениев, к вам вопросов нет ☺️ @syluetNotes
🤣11😁6
Канал Рафа конечно отдельный вид депресняка 💧 Адепты альтсезона, держитесь... @syluetNotes
😱15❤4🥱1🥴1😴1
Наш гемчик в трендовом нарративе приуныл Но вообще, кто не в контексте, механика CCA предполагает что по клиринг прайсу открывается юнисвап пул. Сборы сейла были в ETH, как собственно и пул. так что цена открытия торгов упала на 40% за счёт падения эфира. Открытие торгов завтра https://tge.aztec.network/ Пул юнисвап https://app.uniswap.org/explore/tokens/ethereum/0xA27EC0006e59f245217Ff08CD52A7E8b169E62D2 So tir…
❤5
Mr President.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNiiGruLJ7M @syluetNotes
😁4😢2
Есть у кого-то номер этих типсонов? Нужно срочно обсудить судьбу рынка, а то это уже ни в какие рамки не лезет @syluetNotes
😁12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @syluetNotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Syluet Notes” (@syluetNotes), 272 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syluetNotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.