Channel
@swydssss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002032904750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @swydssss |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/swydssss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 33 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 33 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (7 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 450 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
135 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5213324242682145042 | 46 | 34.1% | |
| custom 5260464614017094403 | 23 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5379837015191746617 | 21 | 15.6% | |
| custom 5251389601523727908 | 16 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5307729509338863913 | 16 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5451934599670163071 | 13 | 9.63% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🫥🫥🫥 Небольшая штучка-редрав картинки, которую я вродеее не показывала. Она делалась для тренда, но мы по итогу других персов взяли, поэтому просто лишняя картинка осталась. В коммы скину старую версию 👁
custom 52133242426821450424custom 53077295093388639132
⭐⭐⭐⭐🤩🤩🤩 Аааа женщина Снова новый персонажик, да-да. Снова в Кипарис, да-да....
custom 53798370151917466179custom 52604646140170944033custom 53077295093388639131
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🎀🎀🎀 Я же говорила, что сегодня 👁 Ловите легенд 🌟 Видео в тт
custom 52604646140170944037custom 53077295093388639132
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟 Внезапная рандомная картинка абсолютно рандомного Рингмастера 💥💥 а вообще у Хоны (надеюсь правильно ник склоняю...) увидела и тоже захотелось почиркать этого чудика, но я немного увлеклась Сначала он мне не нравился, однако с недавних пор, в принципе... Есть вайб. Мне нравятся персонажи связанные с тематикой цирка и в целом выступлений, но зачастую стараюсь обходить их стороной, тк они в большинстве случае…
custom 52513896015237279085custom 53798370151917466172
Только сейчас заметила, что всё это время ссылка на щп не работала 🤦♀️ заменила на точно такую же и она заработала... Что за бред.
custom 54519345996701630713
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🫥🫥🫥 Ловите Айшансов!!! Одно из любимых дуо, несмотря на весь ангст в их лоре 🤫 я такое люблю Эммм, наверное не пейринг??? Хотя, думайте как хотите, мне без разницы, мне нравится и так, и так Но кнш задумывалось скорее как бротп, и даже небольшой сюжетик к арту вырисовывался, что это Шанс жалуется Айту на Эллиота, который не отвечает, о боже, целых 5 минут!!! Сердце казинобоя разбито, как так можно
custom 52133242426821450426custom 52604646140170944034
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟 Наверное, это последние работы на аф (надеюсь, что вы рады КХАХАХ). Не знаю, атаковать поди больше не буду. Если надо будет отрисовать защиту, тогда постараюсь, конечно. Только если не под конец самого аф зальют... А выложу их сразу вместе, потому что могу 💅
custom 52133242426821450427custom 52604646140170944033custom 53077295093388639131
⭐⭐⭐⭐🤩🤩🤩 Чибиииик, которого я чуть не забыла выложить. Целую в руки тех челов на аф, которые в ближайшие дни отрисовывают ответные защиты, они лучшие 🙏
custom 52513896015237279087custom 52133242426821450422
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Мне кажется, что после этого забега мы больше не увидим какие-либо арты от меня ПФХАХ Это всё тоже атаки на аф!
custom 52133242426821450429custom 53798370151917466171
💠🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟💠 ✨Условия ✨ 1. Быть подписанным на этот тгк 2. Репост в лс другу/тгк/активную группу ( пруфы под пост ниже ) 3. Нажать кнопку « участвую » 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 1 — халф арт 2 — скетч любого формата 3 — халф скетч 4 — халф скетч Дд у призов ~ 4 дня. Итоги : 26 июля.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🦷🦷🦷 Какая-то неудачная попытка ультануть резко, к0ехах Очередная защита на аф 😇 Я уже хз что там делать, челы вообще мало атакуют... Грустно
custom 52133242426821450428custom 52604646140170944032custom 53077295093388639131
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🌸🌸🌸 Меня чуть не съели за то, что сразу не выложила 😭 Защита с аф для Кеви
custom 53077295093388639139custom 52604646140170944032custom 53798370151917466172
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @swydssss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 503,459 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“swydssss” (@swydssss), 33 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swydssss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.