Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

prosto katz

@katz1blan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001903530160
TypeChannel
Username@katz1blan
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/katz1blan

Growth

3913 Aug 2026, 11:06 — 39 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 15:08 — 39 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 11:0613 Aug 2026, 15:08
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:0839no change
13 Aug 2026, 11:0639first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

213 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 63299791379308231209645.1%
custom 63277919301303026055123.9%
custom 54584253647012564585023.5%
🌭167.51%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2024 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Feb 2026, 14:05 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

૮₍ ˃ ⤙ ˂ ₎ა ./づᡕᠵ᠊ᡃ່࡚ࠢ࠘ ⸝່ࠡࠣ᠊߯᠆ࠣ࠘ᡁࠣ࠘᠊᠊ࠢ࠘~~~~♡ https://t.me/katziiicheK

🌭2

16 Aug 2024, 08:38 UTC195 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Получила эстафету от @sen1chkaa Суть в том, чтобы вы написали своë мнение о художнике ( обо мне ) и его творчестве под спойлер Передаю эстафету @swydssss По желанию

🌭6custom 63299791379308231205custom 63277919301303026053

14 Aug 2024, 20:43 UTC175 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Как говориться...первый блин комом ? Решила заняться рендерингом волос и глаз , пока плоховато, ххвхв 😀. В пинтерсте нашла какой-то тутор которые мне ± нравится , но я ещë поработаю над этим и сделаю что-то своë. Короче, работаю над этим 💪 Новый перс , друг для Сэку. Хватит быть волком одиночкой, пусть заводит друга на которого можно положиться! P.S. прикрепила версию без этой фигни на волосах , что бы было понятно

custom 632997913793082312012custom 63277919301303026053

12 Aug 2024, 15:24 UTC152 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Зайка

custom 632997913793082312010custom 63277919301303026056🌭1custom 54584253647012564581

11 Aug 2024, 16:45 UTC140 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Я эти ваши аватарки....😇

custom 63299791379308231206custom 63277919301303026055

10 Aug 2024, 08:21 UTC154 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Бублгумба

custom 632997913793082312010custom 63277919301303026055custom 54584253647012564582

9 Aug 2024, 13:14 UTC130 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Он короче подарил жизнь Лэвису , спас его и он теперь в долгу у рыжего. Но Лэвис тупо не помнит его ни лица , ни чего, тем более имени не знает. Единственное, что помнит - это цвет алых глаз , что светились во мраке

custom 63299791379308231205custom 63277919301303026052

9 Aug 2024, 13:10 UTC134 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Мой новый ос , надеюсь навсегда... Я ещë сделаю ему несколько версий одежды , т.к эта мне не нравится , но пусть останется. Его кст звать Итан , да

custom 54584253647012564589custom 63299791379308231205custom 63277919301303026053

7 Aug 2024, 21:06 UTC130 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Тогда покажу подарочек для Киноми на дрешку , которые не могла не нарисовать Первый опыт в пышненьких формах

custom 632997913793082312011custom 63277919301303026055🌭2custom 54584253647012564582

7 Aug 2024, 21:01 UTC145 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ну всë , беру себя снова в руки и постараюсь найти для себя идеальный темп , что бы такого больше не случалось

custom 63299791379308231205custom 63277919301303026052

29 Jul 2024, 00:19 UTC193 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Скиньте в комм жёсткий трек под который он будет крутиться

custom 632997913793082312010custom 63277919301303026054custom 54584253647012564583

25 Jul 2024, 20:10 UTC216 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Я не знаю чо рисовать, поэтому просто посмотрите на херню из телефона и на щелкуна-гандона

custom 545842536470125645812custom 63299791379308231202custom 63277919301303026051

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @katz1blan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,339,664 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“prosto katz” (@katz1blan), 39 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katz1blan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.